Honestly don't get what the issue is with RSK on the shirts, owned by a Charlton supporter, simple, not a gambling firm, ticks all the boxes
I seriously doubt anyone actually minds where the sponsor is based and who they are. I think everyone would agree that it's a positive that it is a Charlton fan sponsoring and not a dodgy sponsor.
The sponsor logo just doesn't look good, it is a bad looking logo. It would even look better with something as simple as a black outline/trim around the RSK and reduce the size. It would pop more and not be an eye sore on the shirt.
Very simple, has a collar and the crest & manufacturer are embroided on.
I've always liked the Norwich canary yellow, bright green and the 'pretty' badge .. however, what is the point of a collar on a garment that is essentially a T shirt ?
It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.
like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.
like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
True, but if the fans actively hate it and end up all buying blank tops, it could be argued you're losing as much as you gain from the contrast. Also, as a sponsor you want the fans of the team you're sponsoring to use your services, so making them instantly dislike your brand isn't a smart move
It's the blue and white clash with the yellow/red/black of the kit that makes it even worse. Doesn't look terrible if done in suitable colours.
like the Preston shirt with the sponsors name/logo in a bright contrasting colour. This really brings attention to the sponsor's name, more bang for yer buck so ter speak
True, but if the fans actively hate it and end up all buying blank tops, it could be argued you're losing as much as you gain from the contrast. Also, as a sponsor you want the fans of the team you're sponsoring to use your services, so making them instantly dislike your brand isn't a smart move
agreed, after all there are great marketing depts, good ones, bad ones and terrible ones
Genuinely one of the worst kit sponsors I've ever seen, luckily for Watford fans, their club agree:
Even though i agree with them it's a strange post from the club though. They've basically said 'we agree our sponsors logo looks shit, we wanted it to be black, we know you hate it so please buy a shirt without it'.
Comments
The sponsor logo just doesn't look good, it is a bad looking logo. It would even look better with something as simple as a black outline/trim around the RSK and reduce the size. It would pop more and not be an eye sore on the shirt.
Don't know if the Championship is going to be covered by the ban on gambling sponsors from next season??
Watford and Southampton's above are both awful.
Edit...haha...I just watched the launch video. Very well played Norwich.
The sponsor reading that must be pretty angry.
https://www.bwfc.co.uk/news/our-story-your-colours-wanderers-launch-202526-mens-womens-macron-home-kits
https://whitesbeaconsfield.co.uk/