Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Palace fans embarrassing themselves again
Comments
-
Just read that not only were Palace dumped into the Conference league and therefore have to face a play off round, but Forest who got bumped up to the Europa do not have to face a play off.
The play off games for Palace are in between PL games 1 and 2, and then 2 and 3. Which again benefits Forest who after a week of rest will play Palace in week 2.15 -
In summary…….fuck ‘em.4
-
When Millwall played in Hungary all them years back, apparently on one of the ferries back afterwards it kicked off between the spanners fans and a load of Belgian paratroopers. Can you imagine the Nigel's in the middle of that dust up? ⛴️ 👊 🧑🦽ForeverAddickted said:
Palace Ultra's will probably send a message via. their Mum's WhatsApp Group, advising no one to wear black, because when the Police start getting involved, they wont want their fans to get confused for the nasty Eastern European Ultras.CafcSCP said:Let’s hope they don’t get any Eastern European teams. They have proper ultras as opposed to a group of blokes that wear black and have a megaphone.0 -
I've read that a couple of times now...absolute classic lolMarcusH26 said:0 -
They got their arses kicked by the South Norwood Teddybear Play Group! Let alone a proper Eastern European firm0
-
soapy_jones said:They got their arses kicked by the South Norwood Teddybear Play Group! Let alone a proper Eastern European firmSo would we!
0 -
18 -
You’ve gotta laugh - the summer they should have been basking in the fa cup win they’ve been fretting and protesting about this - I haven’t followed it so don’t know how unjust it is or not but rules are rules so they should have appealed, sucked it up and treated any reversal as an unexpected bonus - and concentrated on winning the thing they are now in - they’ve compounded their mistake and took the shine off their cup win - badly handled0
-
Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!
25 -
Bring back flags ffs1
- Sponsored links:
-
Who wears gold with a stainless steel watch2
-
Didn't know Mr T had vitiligo...Friend Or Defoe said:Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!2 -
"Hi tattooist from South London. Can I have a tattoo of a charity shield on my stomach"
......
"Hi Nigel, take a seat...someone will be with you shortly".
Calls mental health
"It's me again, that nutter nigel now wants a charity shield tattoo. Can you come and get him sectioned"4 -
You live there!Croydon said:Who wears gold with a stainless steel watch3 -
Plenty of space on that belly for a few more trophy wins 🏆Friend Or Defoe said:Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!0 -
I don’t see one tattoo mentioning the Glaciers…disgraceful to just erase their history. Must be a plastic fan with serious mental problems.Friend Or Defoe said:Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!0 -
Scraped a 1-0 win in the home leg of their playoff game, so work to do in the second leg.0
-
Even he won't put 1861 on there.Friend Or Defoe said:Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!0 -
Good. Have to keep putting their first team out for all games to scrape through until being beaten by some European non entity.killerandflash said:Scraped a 1-0 win in the home leg of their playoff game, so work to do in the second leg.0 -
Sums up this artificial club in pot belly shaped nutshell.North Lower Neil said:
Even he won't put 1861 on there.Friend Or Defoe said:Behold, the first ever Charity Shield tattoo!
Utter utter cnuts. I work (unfortunately) with a Prolapse fan and he sums up your average Nigel to a t.
One of the weirdest people I've ever met.4 - Sponsored links:
-
FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o
Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about to get their club in trouble. Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.2 -
Club deserves to get in trouble. They are the ones who authorised a banner that size to be allowed in the ground.cfgs said:FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o
Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about their club in trouble. Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.12 -
C***y
Runty
Young
Shithead
Tosspot
Asshole
Lovers
Pissing off
All
Legitamate
Anaorak
Celebraters
Everywhere0 -
Thought the first list was a new adult version of the seven dwarfs for a secondKinsella87 said:C***y
Runty
Young
Shithead
Tosspot
Asshole
Lovers
Pissing off
All
Legitamate
Anaorak
Celebraters
Everywhere8 -
Do they want to be the new Millwall or something?0
-
I'd fine Parish for insighting the crowd and deduct ten points because.....cfgs said:FA to investigate Marinakis banner at Palace match - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c5y0zg3n4x8o
Not only embarrassing themselves, but now they may be about to get their club in trouble. Which will lead to them being unable to do their arts and crafts workshop as much.
Looking forward to their club statement
1 -
My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un.1
-
But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un.6 -
Personally I wouldn’t allow political banners e.g. ‘Gooners for Starmer’ or ‘Nigels for Nigel’, but plenty of clubs have banners against an owner, manager or Chief Executive, although it’s usually against their own. Is it defamatory? Its intention potentially is. Still found it funnycfgs said:
But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un.0 -
Not sure what's funny about depicting an owner putting a gun to head of a player, but everyone's sense of humour is different I guess.JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:
Personally I wouldn’t allow political banners e.g. ‘Gooners for Starmer’ or ‘Nigels for Nigel’, but plenty of clubs have banners against an owner, manager or Chief Executive, although it’s usually against their own. Is it defamatory? Its intention potentially is. Still found it funnycfgs said:
But if you allow that it will encourage other banners, which you might not agree with.JohnnyJoeyDeeDee said:My initial knee jerk reaction to all things Palarse is to dislike them, but having seen that banner -come on it’s funny and the Forest owner is a total wrong ‘un.7
