Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Conor Gallagher - Going to Athletico (p81)

1…787980818284»

Comments

  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,120
    I know Spurs have looked at him last two transfer windows.
    Wouldn't be surprised if we go in for him today.
    Not sure he's what we need right now.

    We desperately need a left winger and a centre forward over yet another CM.
  • wolfgang
    wolfgang Posts: 465
    edited December 16
    Bod said:
    Don't do it Conor!!!! Spanish football is great- stay put.
    Do we get any money if he moves?
  • Karim_myBagheri
    Karim_myBagheri Posts: 13,164
    JiMMy 85 said:
    Bedsaddick said:
    Lincsaddick said:
    Gossip on the BBC that he is wanted by Man Utd this January
    He’s exactly what they need . I can see Palace coming in for him 
    He's not mad keen on the latter, but does want to get back to England, or at least first team football, to stand a chance of getting in the WC squad. I think that desire might force his hand. Fucking hope not. 
    Well if he fancies it I'm sure we could offer him first team football. 
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,195
    wolfgang said:
    Bod said:
    Don't do it Conor!!!! Spanish football is great- stay put.
    Do we get any money if he moves?
    For a player that was on loan to us for five months six years ago? 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 12,995
    se9addick said:
    wolfgang said:
    Bod said:
    Don't do it Conor!!!! Spanish football is great- stay put.
    Do we get any money if he moves?
    For a player that was on loan to us for five months six years ago? 
    We would get a tiny amount though because it would be a cross border transfer and we get a FIFA development fee for those 5 months, wouldn't be much though
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,162
    fenaddick said:
    se9addick said:
    wolfgang said:
    Bod said:
    Don't do it Conor!!!! Spanish football is great- stay put.
    Do we get any money if he moves?
    For a player that was on loan to us for five months six years ago? 
    We would get a tiny amount though because it would be a cross border transfer and we get a FIFA development fee for those 5 months, wouldn't be much though
    Yep, it’s minimal. Those 5 months equate to about 0.21% of any transfer fee. So that’s about £10,500 per £5m.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,195
    TelMc32 said:
    fenaddick said:
    se9addick said:
    wolfgang said:
    Bod said:
    Don't do it Conor!!!! Spanish football is great- stay put.
    Do we get any money if he moves?
    For a player that was on loan to us for five months six years ago? 
    We would get a tiny amount though because it would be a cross border transfer and we get a FIFA development fee for those 5 months, wouldn't be much though
    Yep, it’s minimal. Those 5 months equate to about 0.21% of any transfer fee. So that’s about £10,500 per £5m.
    Pretty mad that we get anything, but we’ll take it!
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,356
    I can't grip my head around us getting anything for him but its actually logical. He made an astronomical launchpad to his career 

    Can't help but think if Chelsea weren't Chelsea with Chelsea finances they would be spewing about that 
  • TelMc32
    TelMc32 Posts: 9,162
    Carter said:
    I can't grip my head around us getting anything for him but its actually logical. He made an astronomical launchpad to his career 

    Can't help but think if Chelsea weren't Chelsea with Chelsea finances they would be spewing about that 
    Chelsea would get very short shrift if they did try spewing about it. The rules have tightened a little now, but it wasn’t long ago that they had 42 players out on loan.  They can hardly claim to be nurturing these players when they probably don’t even know who half of them are.  
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,219
    TelMc32 said:
    Carter said:
    I can't grip my head around us getting anything for him but its actually logical. He made an astronomical launchpad to his career 

    Can't help but think if Chelsea weren't Chelsea with Chelsea finances they would be spewing about that 
    Chelsea would get very short shrift if they did try spewing about it. The rules have tightened a little now, but it wasn’t long ago that they had 42 players out on loan.  They can hardly claim to be nurturing these players when they probably don’t even know who half of them are.  
    Three years ago I was at Cobham filming their loan squad in action for pre-season. Like a reserve team, but made up of players who were specifically designated as players to go out on loan for the year. It was a team worth over £100m! 

  • Sponsored links:



  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,195
    JiMMy 85 said:
    TelMc32 said:
    Carter said:
    I can't grip my head around us getting anything for him but its actually logical. He made an astronomical launchpad to his career 

    Can't help but think if Chelsea weren't Chelsea with Chelsea finances they would be spewing about that 
    Chelsea would get very short shrift if they did try spewing about it. The rules have tightened a little now, but it wasn’t long ago that they had 42 players out on loan.  They can hardly claim to be nurturing these players when they probably don’t even know who half of them are.  
    Three years ago I was at Cobham filming their loan squad in action for pre-season. Like a reserve team, but made up of players who were specifically designated as players to go out on loan for the year. It was a team worth over £100m! 
    “Loan squad” is one of those modern football terms I wish I’d never heard!

    Is it still as egregious now or have they calmed down a bit on how many players they have out on loan?

Categories

“Marketplace”