Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Savings and Investments thread
Comments
-

Maybe worth a read before y'all sell up to join hard working entrepreneurs like Matt and Jade Southall in Dubai.😉 Full article in PDF upload1 -
I watched a very good TLDR News video saying something similar and I largely agreed with it. I would add though that things like the terrible handling of the budget is one of the main reasons the economy shrank in latest figures. Consumers and businesses have a real lack of faith, but thankfully the bond markets are holding strong.PragueAddick said:
Maybe worth a read before y'all sell up to join hard working entrepreneurs like Matt and Jade Southall in Dubai.😉 Full article in PDF upload
Having said that, I don't think the entrepreneurs/millionaires are leaving (they're actually not, but if they are good we hate them anyway etc) because of the state of the economy, they are leaving because the taxation laws for foreign millionaires make no sense (taxed on global income means double taxation, inheritance tax on global assets rather than just UK assets etc). A few have also said because of safety. Not because London is a crime ridden hellhole like some bot accounts shilling from Africa would have you believe, but because places like Dubai are incredibly safe.
I'd rather shit in my hands and clap than move to Dubai to be fair, but I could see myself moving to Milan. Places without crime tend to come with the flip side of being soulless oppressive hellholes.
1 -
But buying GooglePragueAddick said:
It's about sleeping well at night, at a senior age. I progressively de-risked my SIPP and to a lesser extent my non-SIPP funds and shares account, by removing excessive holdings of the Big Seven tech stocks, often lurking in funds that have ostensibly a much wider re-mit. I dumped the proceeds in the money market funds. It means that my SIPP is now slowly chugging along regardless of what happens in la-la land. However if things get even more insane, even those funds could take a beating. Actually I have just been offered to renew a one-year bond with Investec at 4.51%, which is pretty much what the MM funds are delivering - and I have to remember the platform fee charge to H-L as well as the (minimal) fund fees. My priority is to hang on to what I have (because I wish to spend some of it while I can enjoy doing that). If you are 20 years younger than me your priorities and risk evaluation will be different. The MM funds will probably be the last funds to tank, but if everything tanks then government guaranteed bank accounts delivering 4.3-4.5% will be a safe harbour I'll be grateful for.valleynick66 said:
So one way of looking at the maths on this is you can move an extra £35k into the safety net of FSCS but lose 0.5% of gain.PragueAddick said:A while ago @bobmunro made a quick comment that even money market/cash funds are not risk-fee. Which I noted, but filed under "inconvenient truths". Today in the FT the deliberately controversial punter-commentator Stuart Kirk has expanded on that, prompting some very interesting BTL comments.
So it's good to note that (and I didn't see anyone make much of this here) the bank deposit guarantee level has been quietly raised from 85k to 120k. (It will be interesting to see if Europe follows suit, so far I have seen not a whisper on it)
The question is, if you use these funds long term, as I am now doing, maybe it's worth de-risking further and switching some of those funds into banks like Charter Savings. You lose maybe 0.5% in returns by doing so, but your wedge will be protected by the government.
If you can't read the article, Stuart Kirk sold all his £650k holdings in equity funds (!) and stuck it in one money market fund, Fidelity Cash, and only after he did it, decided to see what Fidelity Cash really holds. Answer: it ain't cash, not as we know it.That’s about £175 than prior to December when the limit changed.I’m not sure I see why that sum would be the deciding factor?
Isn’t this really that the money market funds are not as close to cash as you might have thought and really the change in the FSCS limit is just an aside - the overall risk is greater than the 0.5% benefit is really the concern?
Incidentally my de-risking involved selling chunks of my tech funds progressively as the market rose (another 5%, another chunk sold). Currently the two funds remain a shade below the last time I sold, on 29 October. I still have more to sell if they kick on another 5%, but so far they are unable to even get higher than the last time I sold. Something, or nothing? Stuart Kirk thinks its something, and so apparently does Warren Buffet, who has been busy selling his Apple holdings.0 -
Alphabet? Do you have a link for that? (not disputing that it's true, just interested). WB has apparently been selling a lot of holdings, not just in Apple.Southbank said:
But buying GooglePragueAddick said:
It's about sleeping well at night, at a senior age. I progressively de-risked my SIPP and to a lesser extent my non-SIPP funds and shares account, by removing excessive holdings of the Big Seven tech stocks, often lurking in funds that have ostensibly a much wider re-mit. I dumped the proceeds in the money market funds. It means that my SIPP is now slowly chugging along regardless of what happens in la-la land. However if things get even more insane, even those funds could take a beating. Actually I have just been offered to renew a one-year bond with Investec at 4.51%, which is pretty much what the MM funds are delivering - and I have to remember the platform fee charge to H-L as well as the (minimal) fund fees. My priority is to hang on to what I have (because I wish to spend some of it while I can enjoy doing that). If you are 20 years younger than me your priorities and risk evaluation will be different. The MM funds will probably be the last funds to tank, but if everything tanks then government guaranteed bank accounts delivering 4.3-4.5% will be a safe harbour I'll be grateful for.valleynick66 said:
So one way of looking at the maths on this is you can move an extra £35k into the safety net of FSCS but lose 0.5% of gain.PragueAddick said:A while ago @bobmunro made a quick comment that even money market/cash funds are not risk-fee. Which I noted, but filed under "inconvenient truths". Today in the FT the deliberately controversial punter-commentator Stuart Kirk has expanded on that, prompting some very interesting BTL comments.
So it's good to note that (and I didn't see anyone make much of this here) the bank deposit guarantee level has been quietly raised from 85k to 120k. (It will be interesting to see if Europe follows suit, so far I have seen not a whisper on it)
The question is, if you use these funds long term, as I am now doing, maybe it's worth de-risking further and switching some of those funds into banks like Charter Savings. You lose maybe 0.5% in returns by doing so, but your wedge will be protected by the government.
If you can't read the article, Stuart Kirk sold all his £650k holdings in equity funds (!) and stuck it in one money market fund, Fidelity Cash, and only after he did it, decided to see what Fidelity Cash really holds. Answer: it ain't cash, not as we know it.That’s about £175 than prior to December when the limit changed.I’m not sure I see why that sum would be the deciding factor?
Isn’t this really that the money market funds are not as close to cash as you might have thought and really the change in the FSCS limit is just an aside - the overall risk is greater than the 0.5% benefit is really the concern?
Incidentally my de-risking involved selling chunks of my tech funds progressively as the market rose (another 5%, another chunk sold). Currently the two funds remain a shade below the last time I sold, on 29 October. I still have more to sell if they kick on another 5%, but so far they are unable to even get higher than the last time I sold. Something, or nothing? Stuart Kirk thinks its something, and so apparently does Warren Buffet, who has been busy selling his Apple holdings.0 -
I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers0
-
Base rate cut to 3.75%.0
-
Obviously I don’t know any of your personal circumstances, but why not just give as much away as you can now?allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers1 -
I have to say that I don't generally deal with business owners or High Net Worth individuals, but on a basic level a Business Relief scheme (used to be called Business Property Relief) could be a good shout for some of your money. Held in your name and not in a Trust (so you still have control over the money) you can invest up to £1m (soon to be £500k for AIM shares) and which is outside your Estate after 2 years.allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers0 -
Sounds like he (or she) already has with regard to PET's mentioned.Rob7Lee said:
Obviously I don’t know any of your personal circumstances, but why not just give as much away as you can now?allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers0 -
golfaddick said:
Sounds like he (or she) already has with regard to PET's mentioned.Rob7Lee said:
Obviously I don’t know any of your personal circumstances, but why not just give as much away as you can now?allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
Yes. Can't do that with a close company's share structure though (I know you know that) so an FIC is probably the way to go.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Thanks. I have looked at this as one of my advisors recommendations, monies dropping out of your estate in 2 years is great, however tying up a large sum of money until death (currently 58) to qualify for relief doesn't appeal. There is also the chance that the relief can be contested and/or future legislation changes the rules of the game.golfaddick said:
I have to say that I don't generally deal with business owners or High Net Worth individuals, but on a basic level a Business Relief scheme (used to be called Business Property Relief) could be a good shout for some of your money. Held in your name and not in a Trust (so you still have control over the money) you can invest up to £1m (soon to be £500k for AIM shares) and which is outside your Estate after 2 years.allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers0 -
For clarity.......allworknoplay said:
Thanks. I have looked at this as one of my advisors recommendations, monies dropping out of your estate in 2 years is great, however tying up a large sum of money until death (currently 58) to qualify for relief doesn't appeal. There is also the chance that the relief can be contested and/or future legislation changes the rules of the game.golfaddick said:
I have to say that I don't generally deal with business owners or High Net Worth individuals, but on a basic level a Business Relief scheme (used to be called Business Property Relief) could be a good shout for some of your money. Held in your name and not in a Trust (so you still have control over the money) you can invest up to £1m (soon to be £500k for AIM shares) and which is outside your Estate after 2 years.allworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
You can put in as much or as little as you like (min usually £5k, max £1m) and it will be outside of your Estate after 2 years. The money is still yours & you can use it whenever you like, so its not tied up at all.
Yes, HMRC could challenge the scheme you are in, but I've not heard of one falling foul of the rules, esp if you use one of the big players.1 -
Agreed, but you need to be invested at point of death to qualify, so essentially it is a life long investment.0
-
True.allworknoplay said:Agreed, but you need to be invested at point of death to qualify, so essentially it is a life long investment.
But at least you are taking steps to mitigate a known IHT problem. Do nothing - big tax bill. Do something - a lesser tax bill. If you do something & then happen to need some of those assets during your lifetime then you haven't wasted anything. If you dont do anything & find out you eventually dont need the money then you've wasted a opportunity & left a greater tax bill.1 -
FTSE100 ending the week on a high.
At 16.20 it just breached 9900 and just 30 points off it's all time high. Will it breach 10,000 for the very first time before the end of the year ??2 -
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers6 -
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
2 -
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/buffett-bought-alphabet-named-top-153433927.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANANd0DJJZMwnf1ECkQG0wvQFHJYL8R37SCE6JAM45nrLpj_75nohur-DgLwztYCS6nU_Tp1dsLzyafr2FllaLwtXIlKv9QUg-7I-hwC0c_AMBIKj2-P1H9ShArgPWRxlcvobM2cDdX1X-yk2vfTfYZyhdDBjXZyu2SrchzWyWyNPragueAddick said:
Alphabet? Do you have a link for that? (not disputing that it's true, just interested). WB has apparently been selling a lot of holdings, not just in Apple.Southbank said:
But buying GooglePragueAddick said:
It's about sleeping well at night, at a senior age. I progressively de-risked my SIPP and to a lesser extent my non-SIPP funds and shares account, by removing excessive holdings of the Big Seven tech stocks, often lurking in funds that have ostensibly a much wider re-mit. I dumped the proceeds in the money market funds. It means that my SIPP is now slowly chugging along regardless of what happens in la-la land. However if things get even more insane, even those funds could take a beating. Actually I have just been offered to renew a one-year bond with Investec at 4.51%, which is pretty much what the MM funds are delivering - and I have to remember the platform fee charge to H-L as well as the (minimal) fund fees. My priority is to hang on to what I have (because I wish to spend some of it while I can enjoy doing that). If you are 20 years younger than me your priorities and risk evaluation will be different. The MM funds will probably be the last funds to tank, but if everything tanks then government guaranteed bank accounts delivering 4.3-4.5% will be a safe harbour I'll be grateful for.valleynick66 said:
So one way of looking at the maths on this is you can move an extra £35k into the safety net of FSCS but lose 0.5% of gain.PragueAddick said:A while ago @bobmunro made a quick comment that even money market/cash funds are not risk-fee. Which I noted, but filed under "inconvenient truths". Today in the FT the deliberately controversial punter-commentator Stuart Kirk has expanded on that, prompting some very interesting BTL comments.
So it's good to note that (and I didn't see anyone make much of this here) the bank deposit guarantee level has been quietly raised from 85k to 120k. (It will be interesting to see if Europe follows suit, so far I have seen not a whisper on it)
The question is, if you use these funds long term, as I am now doing, maybe it's worth de-risking further and switching some of those funds into banks like Charter Savings. You lose maybe 0.5% in returns by doing so, but your wedge will be protected by the government.
If you can't read the article, Stuart Kirk sold all his £650k holdings in equity funds (!) and stuck it in one money market fund, Fidelity Cash, and only after he did it, decided to see what Fidelity Cash really holds. Answer: it ain't cash, not as we know it.That’s about £175 than prior to December when the limit changed.I’m not sure I see why that sum would be the deciding factor?
Isn’t this really that the money market funds are not as close to cash as you might have thought and really the change in the FSCS limit is just an aside - the overall risk is greater than the 0.5% benefit is really the concern?
Incidentally my de-risking involved selling chunks of my tech funds progressively as the market rose (another 5%, another chunk sold). Currently the two funds remain a shade below the last time I sold, on 29 October. I still have more to sell if they kick on another 5%, but so far they are unable to even get higher than the last time I sold. Something, or nothing? Stuart Kirk thinks its something, and so apparently does Warren Buffet, who has been busy selling his Apple holdings.0 -
With just a handful more trading days to go, it's looking like we all undershot! With the FTSE at 9897, @ThreadKiller has it all his/her own way with a 200 point buffer
Name Level Variance % Variance Thread Killer 9761 136.42 1.38% Jints 9750 147.42 1.49% Friend or Defoe 9657 240.42 2.43% Arsenetatters 9525 372.42 3.76% @TelMc32 9450 447.42 4.52% IdleHans 9434 463.42 4.68% Addick Addict 9424 473.42 4.78% Diebythesword 9400 497.42 5.03% cafcpolo 9395 502.42 5.08% StrikerFirmani 9365 532.42 5.38% WHAddick 9335 562.42 5.68% meldrew66 9301 596.42 6.03% Hornchurch 9275 622.42 6.29% Housty 9254 643.42 6.50% blackpool72 9245 652.42 6.59% TheGhostofTomHovi 9236 661.42 6.68% CharltonKerry 9234 663.42 6.70% Covered End 9220 677.42 6.84% Carter 9212 685.42 6.93% Jamescafc 9200 697.42 7.05% Addickinedi 9176 721.42 7.29% RalphMilne 9168 729.42 7.37% valleynick66 9165 732.42 7.40% guinnessaddick 9152 745.42 7.53% thecat 9136 761.42 7.69% fat man on a moped 9116 781.42 7.90% wwaddick 9104 793.42 8.02% golfaddick 9101 796.42 8.05% WishIdStayedInThe Pub 9101 796.42 8.05% Jon_CAFC_ 9088 809.42 8.18% BalladMan 9058 839.42 8.48% Huskaris 9025 872.42 8.81% Solidgone 9021 876.42 8.86% Rob7Lee 9000 897.42 9.07% Bangkokaddick 8998 899.42 9.09% Pedro45 8925 972.42 9.82% LargeAddick 8884 1013.42 10.24% Redman 8876 1021.42 10.32% holyjo 8810 1087.42 10.99% PragueAddick 8725 1172.42 11.85% CAFCWest 8621 1276.42 12.90% Fortune 82nd Minute 8571 1326.42 13.40% HardyAddick 8548 1349.42 13.63% bobmunro 8452 1445.42 14.60% Lenglover 8301 1596.42 16.13% Siv_In_Norfolk 7400 2497.42 25.23% Er_Be_Ab_Pl_Wo_Wo_Ch 6500 3397.42 34.33% 0 -
Up to 2024, most of us mug punters were getting our predictions to within 2-3% of the final closing number. This time I am out by 11%.Now here is a little quiz/‘research. Please only answer off the top of your head. If you just cannot resist looking it up first please just stay schtum and see how the others do.
Who knows what the company Fresnillo does, where is it located, and why should it be of interest to (not just) us mug punters? I’ll go first. I had no clue until I read about it today, but it looks like I am a shareholder!0 -
Sponsored links:
-
🤷🏻♂️0
-
I do, its in one of my pies and I have a relatively modest stake.
Given the price of what it produces going one way I'd say they are 100% worth a punt. Decent divident yield, good growth. Prices might be a bit toppy now and I can't claim any foresight as I got in unknowingly and did so at a good time when prices were 400% lower1 -
When I first read that I thought “that @Carter is a dark horse”, but if I understand a “pie” it is a bundle of shares pre-selected by your platform. Still, good on yer. Hopefully you dont have a pie with Novo Nordisk in it😉Carter said:I do, its in one of my pies and I have a relatively modest stake.
Given the price of what it produces going one way I'd say they are 100% worth a punt. Decent divident yield, good growth. Prices might be a bit toppy now and I can't claim any foresight as I got in unknowingly and did so at a good time when prices were 400% lower
1 -
Yes we are mate but even so it is not easy trying to reach the correct outcome for 1. the business. 2. The kids and 3. Me.allworknoplay said:
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
My point was that like you it seems unfair that we should be put into this situation where we are having to try and protect what has been built over decades before it becomes a poisen chalice3 -
That is correct, I still have a C*nt pie and a nice pie replacing my indivually picked listsPragueAddick said:
When I first read that I thought “that @Carter is a dark horse”, but if I understand a “pie” it is a bundle of shares pre-selected by your platform. Still, good on yer. Hopefully you dont have a pie with Novo Nordisk in it😉Carter said:I do, its in one of my pies and I have a relatively modest stake.
Given the price of what it produces going one way I'd say they are 100% worth a punt. Decent divident yield, good growth. Prices might be a bit toppy now and I can't claim any foresight as I got in unknowingly and did so at a good time when prices were 400% lower
Fresnillo are part of a precious metals pie I copied then modified myself. I'd love to say i picked this individual one myself but I have a feeling the pies original creator takes credit for that
You can copy other people's pies if you think they know what they are doing and the pie aligns with your own goals (recommended) or make your own. I've done a bit of both with a focus on income and regular dividends0 -
AndyG said:
Yes we are mate but even so it is not easy trying to reach the correct outcome for 1. the business. 2. The kids and 3. Me.allworknoplay said:
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
My point was that like you it seems unfair that we should be put into this situation where we are having to try and protect what has been built over decades before it becomes a poisen chalice
IHT applies to business owners and non business owners alike.1 -
Gold mining ??PragueAddick said:Up to 2024, most of us mug punters were getting our predictions to within 2-3% of the final closing number. This time I am out by 11%.Now here is a little quiz/‘research. Please only answer off the top of your head. If you just cannot resist looking it up first please just stay schtum and see how the others do.
Who knows what the company Fresnillo does, where is it located, and why should it be of interest to (not just) us mug punters? I’ll go first. I had no clue until I read about it today, but it looks like I am a shareholder!
I would say South Africa but its not a SA sounding name. Sounds more US based.0 -
Absolutely, but if you throw a successful business into the mix the stakes are likely to be higher, and the need for IHT planning all the more important.bobmunro said:AndyG said:
Yes we are mate but even so it is not easy trying to reach the correct outcome for 1. the business. 2. The kids and 3. Me.allworknoplay said:
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
My point was that like you it seems unfair that we should be put into this situation where we are having to try and protect what has been built over decades before it becomes a poisen chalice
IHT applies to business owners and non business owners alike.0 -
Yes of course Bob and I have no problem with that at all, I have never shirked at paying tax, however now that business value comes into the mix it leaves a lot of people like me that have a business which would be valued at far higher than my kids could hope to pay the tax on. The value of a business does not = cash available for inheritance tax in many casesbobmunro said:AndyG said:
Yes we are mate but even so it is not easy trying to reach the correct outcome for 1. the business. 2. The kids and 3. Me.allworknoplay said:
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
My point was that like you it seems unfair that we should be put into this situation where we are having to try and protect what has been built over decades before it becomes a poisen chalice
IHT applies to business owners and non business owners alike.3 -
I assume it's no longer possible to just transfer the company to your children now?AndyG said:
Yes of course Bob and I have no problem with that at all, I have never shirked at paying tax, however now that business value comes into the mix it leaves a lot of people like me that have a business which would be valued at far higher than my kids could hope to pay the tax on. The value of a business does not = cash available for inheritance tax in many casesbobmunro said:AndyG said:
Yes we are mate but even so it is not easy trying to reach the correct outcome for 1. the business. 2. The kids and 3. Me.allworknoplay said:
Are you getting professional advice? Personally I find it really worrying. Trying to make the right decisions which are best for the family. When I started my business in the late eighties it was all about working hard and doing well, but now I feel that things are stacked against business owners. The big one for me was the decision to include pensions into your estate for IHT.AndyG said:
Hi mate. I’m in the same position and currently looking at the same options as you. Like you I can’t decide what way to go. The budget bringing company share values into play has really buggered things up hasn’t it. Spent my life building a business which will eventually potentially either bankrupt my kids or force the closure of a business that provides employment for a not insignificant number of people. The people making these decisions honestly have no brainallworknoplay said:I have worked hard to build up a reasonably successful company during my working life and as a result have also built up a significant future IHT bill as my reward. I have been working with a small wealth management company for a good few years and have been warm hand gifting (PETs) to my kids and grandkids. I am now thinking of converting my current limited company into a FIC, taking out some fairly substantial Whole of Life insurance and various trust structures to try to reduce the IHT liability and go someway to protecting what will be a fairly large inheritance for the benefit of the family. It has all got really complicated with lots of potential fees involved for everyone and if I am honest, I am not sure I am doing the right thing. I absolutely trust my advisors, but I can't help feeling I need someone to review the proposals and sense check it, so I don't blindly walk into something which I don't entirely understand. Any thoughts and advice on how to proceed would be very welcome. Cheers
My point was that like you it seems unfair that we should be put into this situation where we are having to try and protect what has been built over decades before it becomes a poisen chalice
IHT applies to business owners and non business owners alike.0





