Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: CHARLTON 1-0 OXFORD

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,713
edited December 26 in General Charlton

thanks to the 87 Lifers for their marks

Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.38.27.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 18.46.58.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.39.04.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.39.15.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.39.29.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.39.43.png Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 16.39.53.png

Comments

  • bolloxbolder
    bolloxbolder Posts: 8,051
    @lancashire lad we played Oxford yesterday. 

    Great stars as ever.  Thanks 
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 3,109
    i hope Lancashire lad has seen into the future.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,713
    Amendment made - thanks
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,049
    Good win but nine shots at home against the 2nd bottom team is poor. 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,522
    Good win but nine shots at home against the 2nd bottom team is poor. 
    It was our most dominant performance in maybe 3 months? Game isn't played on paper ffs
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,699
    Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul? 
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,319
    It is often a misleading stat. We often get sides to shot from long rage which are rarely a problem. 
    Having said that there is a slight inconsistency  here. Player shots do show 9 but the team stats show 13. I suspect LL gets them from different sources, 
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,713
    I get my stats by carefully going through the minute by minute "commentary" issued by the Press Association and used by such media outlets as BBC. I have noticed that the shots tally rarely matches but have given up worrying about it, whether I'm right or wrong I have no idea, there might be more accurate stat providers but I don't know of them and really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't :)
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,713
    edited December 21
    Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul? 
    correct, amendment made with thanks
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,224
    Cheers as always LL. Great to see how tight at the top of the player stats it was yesterday!

  • Sponsored links:



  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,699
    Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul? 
    correct, amendment made with thanks
    Welcome! Thanks as ever for your incredible work on this. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,495
    Incredibly tight top 4!
  • cafcsinger
    cafcsinger Posts: 5,610
     Can you imagine if Leaburn played like Tanto on Saturday, getting a mark of 6.14? Seems like if the team wins everyone who didn't play well gets bumped up a little bit, which i have never understood. 
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,319
     Can you imagine if Leaburn played like Tanto on Saturday, getting a mark of 6.14? Seems like if the team wins everyone who didn't play well gets bumped up a little bit, which i have never understood. 
    Because the team rarely plays well unless everybody does to some extent. It is a team game where the team play together, not as 11 individuals. Particularly true of the way Nathan sets us up. 
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,994
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/live/cgkenr25dgmt

    On the topic of ratings, the Birmingham game ones were mind blowing, for a well competed match where overall they were the better team, yet scroll down on that link and compare our player ratings to theirs! 
  • wolfgang
    wolfgang Posts: 485
    ... really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't :)
    Well I suggest you start. What the hell do we pay you for?
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 23,800
    edited December 23
    wolfgang said:
    ... really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't :)
    Well I suggest you start. What the hell do we pay you for?
    Staying power I reckon...🤦‍♂️