Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
STATBANK: CHARLTON 1-0 OXFORD
lancashire lad
Posts: 15,713
thanks to the 87 Lifers for their marks
7
Comments
-
0
-
i hope Lancashire lad has seen into the future.3
-
Amendment made - thanks1
-
Good win but nine shots at home against the 2nd bottom team is poor.5
-
It was our most dominant performance in maybe 3 months? Game isn't played on paper ffsGisappointed said:Good win but nine shots at home against the 2nd bottom team is poor.5 -
Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul?0
-
It is often a misleading stat. We often get sides to shot from long rage which are rarely a problem.
Having said that there is a slight inconsistency here. Player shots do show 9 but the team stats show 13. I suspect LL gets them from different sources,0 -
I get my stats by carefully going through the minute by minute "commentary" issued by the Press Association and used by such media outlets as BBC. I have noticed that the shots tally rarely matches but have given up worrying about it, whether I'm right or wrong I have no idea, there might be more accurate stat providers but I don't know of them and really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't
4 -
correct, amendment made with thanksWeegie Addick said:Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul?2 -
Cheers as always LL. Great to see how tight at the top of the player stats it was yesterday!0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Welcome! Thanks as ever for your incredible work on this.lancashire lad said:
correct, amendment made with thanksWeegie Addick said:Very close at the top! Thought LJ got booked and surely he gave away at least 1 foul?3 -
Incredibly tight top 4!0
-
Can you imagine if Leaburn played like Tanto on Saturday, getting a mark of 6.14? Seems like if the team wins everyone who didn't play well gets bumped up a little bit, which i have never understood.0
-
Because the team rarely plays well unless everybody does to some extent. It is a team game where the team play together, not as 11 individuals. Particularly true of the way Nathan sets us up.cafcsinger said:Can you imagine if Leaburn played like Tanto on Saturday, getting a mark of 6.14? Seems like if the team wins everyone who didn't play well gets bumped up a little bit, which i have never understood.3 -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/live/cgkenr25dgmtOn the topic of ratings, the Birmingham game ones were mind blowing, for a well competed match where overall they were the better team, yet scroll down on that link and compare our player ratings to theirs!0
-
Well I suggest you start. What the hell do we pay you for?lancashire lad said:... really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't
5 -
Staying power I reckon...🤦♂️wolfgang said:
Well I suggest you start. What the hell do we pay you for?lancashire lad said:... really there is no way of proving which outlet is correct and unless you watch every second with your pencil and notebook at the ready - I don't
0












