Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Norwich v Charlton (closes tomorrow (Saturday) lunchtime

2»

Comments

  • Blucher
    Blucher Posts: 4,193

    KAMINSKI: 8 - kept us in it

    GOUGH: 6.5 - a very sound debut

    JONES: 6 - up against a very tough opponent but did ok

    GILLESPHEY: 6 - alright

    BREE: 3 - his worst game for us. Is he carrying an injury or is it a catastrophic loss of form ?

    CAREY: 5 - couldn't get in the game

    COVENTRY: 6.5 - one of our few competent players

    ANDERSON: 6 - gets across the ground well but poor in possession

    BELL: 6 - a little rusty but was fine in his comeback. Good to get 60 minutes under his belt

    LEABURN: 4.5 - couldn't get in the game

    OLAOFE: 4.5 - a couple of good moments but is struggling at this level

    Referee: 6 - ok

    Subs: T.C.: 6 - put in one very good cross near the end (our only one of the entire game) and sprinted back over half the pitch to put their forward off when a second goal on the break looked certain towards the end. He has that rare ability - especially for this team - to beat players and take them out of the game

    Docherty: 4 - no impact

    Apter: - 4.5 - I was hoping he'd take a couple of corners but it was not to be

    Kelman: 4 - no service and I don't recall him touching the ball

  • ro_addick
    ro_addick Posts: 304
    Fully agree...in fact, appears a majority are struggling badly at this level. Woe betide us into this New Year. 
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,812

    KAMINSKI: 8 mom  only real performance 

    GOUGH: 6  decent debut 

    JONES: 6  ok but dithered a bit 

    GILLESPHEY: 5 anonymous 

    BREE: 2  fucking awful

    CAREY: 6.5 tried hard

    COVENTRY: 6.5 decent

    ANDERSON: 6  busy

    BELL: 5  bit his usual dominant self 

    LEABURN: 6  battled away  win a few headers 

    OLAOFE: 5 couple of decent lay offs but little else

    Referee: 8

    Subs: T.C.: 6 couple of crosses but some ponderous play too

    Docherty: 5  meh

    Apter: 4 offered nothing 

    Kelman: 5 did he touch the ball?

  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,867

    KAMINSKI: 7

    GOUGH: 6

    JONES: 6.5

    GILLESPHEY: 6

    BREE: 2

    COREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 6.5

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 6

    OLAOFE: 6.5

    Referee: 

    Subs: T.C.: 4.5

    Docherty: 2

    Apter: 4

    Kelman:3.5

  • marks 0.5 to 10.0, if you please:

    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH: 7

    JONES:7

    GILLESPHEY:7

    BREE:5

    COREY:6.5

    COVENTRY:7.5

    ANDERSON:5

    BELL:6

    LEABURN:5

    OLAOFE:4

    Referee:5

    Subs: T.C.:6

    Docherty:6

    Apter:6

    Kelman:6

    Berry: n/a


  • Oakster2
    Oakster2 Posts: 321

    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH: 8

    JONES: 7

    GILLESPHEY: 6

    BREE: 3

    COREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 5

    BELL: 7

    LEABURN: 5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 

    Subs: T.C.: 4

    Docherty: 5

    Apter: 5

    Kelman: 4

    Berry: n/a

  • KAMINSKI: 7.5
    GOUGH: 7.5
    JONES: 7
    GILLESPHEY: 6
    BREE: 3
    CAREY: 6
    COVENTRY: 6.5
    ANDERSON: 6
    BELL: 6.5
    LEABURN: 6
    OLAOFE: 6

    Referee: 5

    Subs: T.C.: 4.5
    Docherty: 5
    Apter: 5
    Kelman: 5
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,368

    marks 0.5 to 10.0, if you please:

    KAMINSKI   7

    GOUGH:   7

    JONES:   6

    GILLESPHEY:  5.5

    BREE:  3

    COREY:  6

    COVENTRY:  6.5

    ANDERSON:  6

    BELL:  6

    LEABURN: 4

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee:

    Subs: T.C.: 6.5

    Docherty:  6

    Apter:   6

    Kelman:  6

    Berry: n/a


  • newyorkaddick
    newyorkaddick Posts: 3,058

    KAMINSKI: 7

    GOUGH: 6

    JONES: 6

    GILLESPHEY: 6

    BREE: 5

    COREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 4

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 4

    OLAOFE: 4

    Referee: 7

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 7

    Apter: 5

    Kelman: 4

  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 896

    KAMINSKI: 8

    GOUGH: 8

    JONES: 6

    GILLESPHEY: 5

    BREE: 3

    CAREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 4

    BELL: 7

    LEABURN: 5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 8

    Subs: T.C.: 5

    Docherty: 5

    Apter: 5

    Kelman: 5

    Berry: n/a 


  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,492

    marks 0.5 to 10.0, if you please:

    KAMINSKI 7

    GOUGH: 7.5

    JONES: 6.5

    GILLESPHEY: 6

    BREE: 4

    COREY: 5.5

    COVENTRY: 6.5

    ANDERSON: 6

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 6

    Subs: T.C.: 5

    Docherty: 5

    Apter: 5.5

    Kelman: 5

    Berry: n/a


  • RugbyAddick
    RugbyAddick Posts: 2,093

    KAMINSKI 8 some decent saves. No chance with the goal

    GOUGH: 8 calm and assured at the back. Very good full debut

    JONES: 7 may have lost his man for the goal 

    GILLESPHEY: 7.5 solid 

    BREE: 2 dreadful. Set pieces were embarrassing and put us under pressure from counter attacks every time  

    CAREY: 6 not his game

    COVENTRY: 7 battled hard

    ANDERSON: 7 battled hard 

    BELL: 7 good to see him back 

    LEABURN: 4.5 poor service throughout. Didn’t seem to try as hard as the Oxford game

    OLAOFE: 4.5 hard to watch 

    Referee: 6 done okay 

    Subs: T.C.: 6 saved a certain goal with the track back 

    Docherty: 5 brought on to change the game. Didn’t do so

    Apter: 5 see Doc

    Kelman: 5 see Doc but also, no service whatsoever 

    Berry: n/a 

  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,818

    At the game

    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH:7.5

    JONES: 7

    GILLESPHEY: 6.5

    BREE: 5

    COREY: 5.5

    COVENTRY: 5.5

    ANDERSON: 5.5

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 6

    OLAOFE: 6

    Referee: 6

    Subs: T.C.: 5.5

    Docherty: 5.5

    Apter: 5.5

    Kelman: 5.5

  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,319

    KAMINSKI 6.5

    GOUGH:6.5

    JONES:6.5

    GILLESPHEY:6.5

    BREE:4

    COREY:5.5

    COVENTRY:6

    ANDERSON:5.5

    BELL:5.5

    LEABURN:5

    OLAOFE:4.5

    Referee:5

    Subs: T.C.:4.5

    Docherty:5.5

    Apter:5.5

    Kelman:5.5

  • jose
    jose Posts: 883

    KAMINSKI 7.5

    GOUGH: 7

    JONES: 6

    GILLESPHEY: 6.5

    BREE: 5

    CAREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 7

    ANDERSON: 7

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 6

    OLAOFE: 6

    Referee: 5

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 4

    Apter: 5

    Kelman: 5

  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,544
    edited December 26

    KAMINSKI 7.5 - He would be in the Prem if his distribution was better. Okay, maybe he'd be high end Championship, but still. Some great reflexes, some poor kicking.

    GOUGH: 7 - Had some ropey moments but he gets an extra .5 for it being his league debut and only having played like 2 league minutes at all up to this point. There's more to come from him, I just hope it isn't until next season.

    JONES: 7 - Solid if unspectacular

    GILLESPHEY: 6.5 - Looked better with Bell next to him. He can actually pass to a teammate. But as the game opened up, so did he. I think the LWB dictates how he plays a lot, and understandably so. I think some are a little over the top with criticism of him. He wasn't great, but he wasn't our worst player, which brings us onto...

    BREE: 3 - He won't be that bad again. 

    CAREY: 5 - Anonymous again. But I do feel for him feed on scraps and flick ons. We need more from our third midfielder. It may be time to give Knibbs a go and let Carey come on against a tiring side. It's not all on him, he struggles to get the ball at his feet but when he does he tries to do too much with it.

    COVENTRY: 7.5 MOTM - Did everything he could. 

    ANDERSON: 7 - Good in the press, less good on the ball

    BELL: 7 - Solid and for 60 minutes we looked like we could get a point without playing particularly well. Unfortunately, he's only 60 minutes fit right now. You can criticize NJ for all the subs bar having to take Bell off (yes he could have brought on Apter although I don't think anyone expected TC to be as poor as he was).

    LEABURN: 5.5 - When he won headers there were three Norwich players up against Tants who just got the ball back. Kaminski's kicking, along with the distribution limitations of the backline and midfield make his job a lot harder.

    OLAOFE: 5 - He is technically limited, and it shows when he starts. He also wants to pull out wide, which leaves Miles isolated. His touch is better suited out wide, as is his pace. We need Kelman 60 minutes fit ASAP.

    Referee: 6 - fine

    Subs: T.C.: 5 - Gets a bit of a let off for having to do a job at LWB, but he was poor. And to be fair, he nearly caused an own goal.

    Docherty: 4.5 - I just don't think he's up to this level as an 8. Isn't quite good enough on the ball, isn't quite mobile enough, isn't quite positionally disciplined enough. He came on, we looked open.

    Apter: 5 - Was there

    Kelman: 5 - Was there

    Berry: n/a

  • SE_7EVEN
    SE_7EVEN Posts: 299

    KAMINSKI: 8
    GOUGH: 7
    JONES: 7
    GILLESPHEY: 6
    BREE: 4
    CAREY: 6
    COVENTRY: 7
    ANDERSON: 5
    BELL: 7
    LEABURN: 5
    OLAOFE: 7

    Referee: 4

    Subs: T.C.: 6
    Docherty: 5
    Apter: 5
    Kelman: 5

  • mattwils
    mattwils Posts: 220

    KAMINSKI 7

    GOUGH: 7.5

    JONES: 7

    GILLESPHEY: 6.5

    BREE: 5

    COREY: 6

    COVENTRY: 7

    ANDERSON: 6.5

    BELL: 6.5

    LEABURN: 6

    OLAOFE: 6

    Referee: 6

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 6

    Apter: 6

    Kelman: 5.5

    Berry: n/a

  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,613

    KAMINSKI: 8 - Man of the Match. 

    GOUGH: 7 - Good showing. 

    JONES: 6.5

    GILLESPHEY: 6

    BREE: 2 - Impressively bad. 

    CAREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 7

    ANDERSON: 6.5

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 4

    OLAOFE: 4

    Referee: 6

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 4 Instantly made us much worse. 

    Apter: 6

    Kelman: 6

  • Stuart_the_Red
    Stuart_the_Red Posts: 1,932

    KAMINSKI: 8

    GOUGH: 8

    JONES: 7

    GILLESPHEY: 7

    BREE: 5

    CAREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 7

    ANDERSON: 6

    BELL: 7

    LEABURN: 5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 5

    Subs: 

    T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 4

    Apter: 6

    Kelman: 5


  • Sponsored links:



  • scruffle
    scruffle Posts: 2,297
    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH: 7

    JONES: 5

    GILLESPHEY: 5

    BREE: 4

    COREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 7

    ANDERSON: 7

    BELL: 5.5

    LEABURN:6

    OLAOFE:6

    Referee:6

    Subs: T.C.:3

    Docherty:3

    Apter:3

    Kelman:3

    Berry: n/a
  • Jdredsox
    Jdredsox Posts: 550
    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH: 6.5

    JONES: 5

    GILLESPHEY: 5

    BREE: 4

    CAREY: 5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 6

    BELL: 7

    LEABURN: 5.5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 7

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 6

    Apter: 6

    Kelman: 6

    Berry: n/a
  • JamesSeed
    JamesSeed Posts: 17,417

    KAMINSKI 8

    GOUGH: 8 MOM

    JONES: 6.5

    GILLESPHEY: 5

    BREE: 3

    COREY: 6

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 5

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 5

    OLAOFE: 6

  • ateamofcorygibbs
    ateamofcorygibbs Posts: 1,226

    KAMINSKI: 8

    GOUGH: 6.5

    JONES: 5.5

    GILLESPHEY: 5.5

    BREE: 4.5

    CAREY: 4.5

    COVENTRY: 6

    ANDERSON: 5

    BELL: 6

    LEABURN: 4.5

    OLAOFE: 5

    Referee: 5

    Subs: T.C.: 6

    Docherty: 6

    Apter: 4

    Kelman: 5