Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The hill I would die on.

2

Comments

  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,868
    That scoring goals is more important than keeping a clean sheet.

    (And neither toffee or salted - just sweet)
    You've died on that one plenty of times  ;)
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 18,403
    edited May 18
    M&S ketchup is better than Heinz.

    The more someone posts idyllic pictures of their life on social media, the more likely it is that they're not actually happy.
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,348
    Can someone please explain the thread title..!  Makes no sense to me!
  • Mr. Happy
    Mr. Happy Posts: 661
    I like how this started with a popcorn preference yet still had two suggestions of mass murder before we even got to page 2.
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,938
    Mr. Happy said:
    I like how this started with a popcorn preference yet still had two suggestions of mass murder before we even got to page 2.

    Did that make you Mr Sad, Mr Happy 🤔
  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,938
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 19,196
    Fanny 

    You rang ? 
  • CaptainRobbo
    CaptainRobbo Posts: 2,127
    Fanny 

    You rang ? 

  • Fanny Fanackapan
    Fanny Fanackapan Posts: 19,196
    MrOneLung said:
    Compulsory euthanasia at 80. 

    Barely anything of benefit to society is provided by over 80’s 

    the NHS gets freed up. 

    The housing market is stimulated 

    you know exactly how long your pension needs to last, so no scrimping in case you live to 95

    zero downside 
    Mr F is tracking you down as we speak....


    ....astride his motability scooter, hearing aids in place , pacemaker on board but still wearing his Mods' parka .... B)
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,868
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    People paying for their own children - what a disgrace.
    Totally unfair concept.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Bod
    Bod Posts: 286
    Salted popcorn is a crime. Like adding salt to caramel, ghastly.
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,826
    If with 3 games to go we can still go down yet have the chance to stop the scum going up by losing , I will always roll the dice to stop them cnuts from any form of success 
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,903
    Chunes said:
    M&S ketchup is better than Heinz.

    The more someone posts idyllic pictures of their life on social media, the more likely it is that they're not actually happy.
    M&S Jaffa cakes are better than McVities
  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,245
    Liv Hill
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,598
    buckshee said:
    Chunes said:
    M&S ketchup is better than Heinz.

    The more someone posts idyllic pictures of their life on social media, the more likely it is that they're not actually happy.
    M&S Jaffa cakes are better than McVities
    And Morrisons own are better than both, and I haven't even got to Aldi cherry bakewell ones. M&S ones are very good 
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,549
    buckshee said:
    Chunes said:
    M&S ketchup is better than Heinz.

    The more someone posts idyllic pictures of their life on social media, the more likely it is that they're not actually happy.
    M&S Jaffa cakes are better than McVities
    Same with M&S Jammy Dodgers vs whoever normally makes them. 
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 9,145
    Nearly come unstuck coming down Speed Hill in Greenwich Park at about 30mph in my Bauers once
  • charltonkeston
    charltonkeston Posts: 7,475
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    Yet another boomer generation advantage we deny our children's generation, it used to be unquestioned now it has limits, variations of how much and who gets it or not. As man born in 1963 the list of stuff I've had that my son or his children, (if he ever can afford them), will have to cough up for gets added to.
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 26,607
    edited May 19
    Lets hear it for...Pan Yan pickle...


  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,773
    buckshee said:
    Chunes said:
    M&S ketchup is better than Heinz.

    The more someone posts idyllic pictures of their life on social media, the more likely it is that they're not actually happy.
    M&S Jaffa cakes are better than McVities
    You don't have to go to M&S levels to be better than McVities. Lidl's Jaffa Cakes are better than McVities. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Briston_Addick
    Briston_Addick Posts: 13,544
    edited May 19
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    Ooh, aren't you the Prince Charming?


  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,903
    Michael Jackson died in that Pepsi incident. The guy we saw later on was a replacement who looked and acted nothing like the original Michael, they then got rid of that guy when the new music was no longer making money and knew that the money was more from his death. 
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 8,048
    buckshee said:
    Michael Jackson died in that Pepsi incident. The guy we saw later on was a replacement who looked and acted nothing like the original Michael, they then got rid of that guy when the new music was no longer making money and knew that the money was more from his death. 

  • Radostanradical
    Radostanradical Posts: 1,281
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    Tbf the whole thing is bizarre and unfair from the start.

    I no longer live in the UK but when we has our first child, I was in the UK and earning below the threshold to receive child allowance. After around 9 months, I came to the same conclusion as you re financial costs and luckily I was working in a relatively niche field in technology for the public sector, whuch enabled me to move quite quickly to a higher paying jobin provate sector and was in a weird position where I was entitped to some but not all the allowance. Then the next year got a pay rise that took me completely above the allowance limit. The whole time my partner had informed them of our finances and they kept paying us.

    Fortunately we knew we shouldnt really be getting it so it just went in to an account and wasnt touched. Whilst we waited for the day they came back for there money. Lo and behold said day came after 3 years. No problem I thought incorrectly as assumed they know how much they paid me and hiw much I am paid they will just tell me figure and id pay them. Nope I had to retrospectively do three self assessments for them to tell me how much I owed. Eventually got it sorted but it was a huge  buoecracy, they then tried to make me pay late fees for my SA's (which i wasnt aware I had to do) they eventually accepted it would be unfiar and waived them.

    However the system for this is hugely unfair as it and for free child care hours too. Essentially people like myself and others (who pay more tax than others) are disqualified from perks we literally paid more towards (and in the case of childcare hours it literally negatively impacts the economy), also a couple where both earn 99k will get full free childcare hours even though household income 198k, where as a family where one parent works but earns 101k get zero hours. In the rest of Europe its just accepted you pay tax you get these benefits.

    The only reason they dont give everyone these perks is the UK always wants to appear to be punishing people for success, IMO. They feel there is always an undercurrent of unfairness if someone has done well.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 22,128
    When his life flashed before him as he died, did MJ think ‘who’s that little black kid singing my songs’ 

    Credit to Sean Locke 
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,773
    edited May 25
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    Tbf the whole thing is bizarre and unfair from the start.

    I no longer live in the UK but when we has our first child, I was in the UK and earning below the threshold to receive child allowance. After around 9 months, I came to the same conclusion as you re financial costs and luckily I was working in a relatively niche field in technology for the public sector, whuch enabled me to move quite quickly to a higher paying jobin provate sector and was in a weird position where I was entitped to some but not all the allowance. Then the next year got a pay rise that took me completely above the allowance limit. The whole time my partner had informed them of our finances and they kept paying us.

    Fortunately we knew we shouldnt really be getting it so it just went in to an account and wasnt touched. Whilst we waited for the day they came back for there money. Lo and behold said day came after 3 years. No problem I thought incorrectly as assumed they know how much they paid me and hiw much I am paid they will just tell me figure and id pay them. Nope I had to retrospectively do three self assessments for them to tell me how much I owed. Eventually got it sorted but it was a huge  buoecracy, they then tried to make me pay late fees for my SA's (which i wasnt aware I had to do) they eventually accepted it would be unfiar and waived them.

    However the system for this is hugely unfair as it and for free child care hours too. Essentially people like myself and others (who pay more tax than others) are disqualified from perks we literally paid more towards (and in the case of childcare hours it literally negatively impacts the economy), also a couple where both earn 99k will get full free childcare hours even though household income 198k, where as a family where one parent works but earns 101k get zero hours. In the rest of Europe its just accepted you pay tax you get these benefits.

    The only reason they dont give everyone these perks is the UK always wants to appear to be punishing people for success, IMO. They feel there is always an undercurrent of unfairness if someone has done well.
    Such a shame, you were doing really well in describing some of the inequities of the welfare system and then you reached your conclusion and started sounding like a tin-hatted nutter. 
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,277
    Denial of a goalscoring opportunity shouldn't be a red card if it's outside the penalty area - it should be a penalty. 
  • Greenhithe
    Greenhithe Posts: 958
    Temple.  

    Dartford born and bred 
  • Big William
    Big William Posts: 3,926
    Short corners are shit
  • Radostanradical
    Radostanradical Posts: 1,281
    Stig said:
    The Hill I would die on: 
    If you can have more than two children, you pay for them and don't expect the state to pay for your 3rd, 4th, or 5th in Child allowance; Just one of the many U-turns we have seen in the last 2 years.
    You think some people have never heard of birth control or the morning after pill. 

    The allowance should goes up for the first two Children as we need folk to have children to pass the baton of life on to before we are culled at 80 !!!

    My wife knew my soapbox views and after 2 healthy kids she suddenly wanted more but I was Adam Ant that the financial costs would make me work even longer hours than I was already working.
    I retired early and can live in luxury for the rest of my life as long as I die before the August bank holiday this year 🙄
    Tbf the whole thing is bizarre and unfair from the start.

    I no longer live in the UK but when we has our first child, I was in the UK and earning below the threshold to receive child allowance. After around 9 months, I came to the same conclusion as you re financial costs and luckily I was working in a relatively niche field in technology for the public sector, whuch enabled me to move quite quickly to a higher paying jobin provate sector and was in a weird position where I was entitped to some but not all the allowance. Then the next year got a pay rise that took me completely above the allowance limit. The whole time my partner had informed them of our finances and they kept paying us.

    Fortunately we knew we shouldnt really be getting it so it just went in to an account and wasnt touched. Whilst we waited for the day they came back for there money. Lo and behold said day came after 3 years. No problem I thought incorrectly as assumed they know how much they paid me and hiw much I am paid they will just tell me figure and id pay them. Nope I had to retrospectively do three self assessments for them to tell me how much I owed. Eventually got it sorted but it was a huge  buoecracy, they then tried to make me pay late fees for my SA's (which i wasnt aware I had to do) they eventually accepted it would be unfiar and waived them.

    However the system for this is hugely unfair as it and for free child care hours too. Essentially people like myself and others (who pay more tax than others) are disqualified from perks we literally paid more towards (and in the case of childcare hours it literally negatively impacts the economy), also a couple where both earn 99k will get full free childcare hours even though household income 198k, where as a family where one parent works but earns 101k get zero hours. In the rest of Europe its just accepted you pay tax you get these benefits.

    The only reason they dont give everyone these perks is the UK always wants to appear to be punishing people for success, IMO. They feel there is always an undercurrent of unfairness if someone has done well.
    Such a shame, you were doing really well in describing some of the inequities of the welfare system and then you reached your conclusion and started sounding like a tin-hatted nutter. 
    Well please explain why they would pick to exclude people earning over a certain amount when doing so is clearly detrimental to the economy for anyone who can use an iota of grey matter.

    To clarify I dont think ots a secret cabal of rich people that want to keep peeople down, I believe politicians are worried how it would look if they allowed people whom most would consider rich (I disagree with that tag personally) to have access to benefits.