Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Millwall red from Saturday rescinded

PL54
PL54 Posts: 10,757
edited December 2009 in Fun, Jokes & Captions
according to SSN

Comments

  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    good.. as it wasn't a red anyway -- now for michael turner.. how does he now get a 4 game ban.. this fa is a DISGRACE
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2009/Turner221209.aspx
  • Cuff
    Cuff Posts: 308
    They don't think it was " denial of an obvious goalscoring opportunity"??????????????????
    Some one likes em
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 33,616
    I'm starting to get fed up with all these post-match "changes" - red cards rescinded, tackles that went unpunished then having the perportrator banned etc etc

    So. if the FA think that Sam was not denied "a obvious goalscoring opportunity" by being upended 6 yards from an open goal then surely a penalty shouldn't have been awarded - which meant that we would have gone on and lost the game. Therefore we should be docked a point and Mllwall given another 2.........or, on the other hand, if he hadn't have been sent off, we would have played against 11 men, not 10 amd therefore played differently (and better) and gone on and won. Therefore should we have all 3 points and Millwall none ???????
  • Sam lloyd
    Sam lloyd Posts: 1,083
    [cite]Posted By: golfaddick[/cite]I'm starting to get fed up with all these post-match "changes" - red cards rescinded, tackles that went unpunished then having the perportrator banned etc etc

    So. if the FA think that Sam was not denied "a obvious goalscoring opportunity" by being upended 6 yards from an open goal then surely a penalty shouldn't have been awarded - which meant that we would have gone on and lost the game. Therefore we should be docked a point and Mllwall given another 2.........or, on the other hand, if he hadn't have been sent off, we would have played against 11 men, not 10 amd therefore played differently (and better) and gone on and won. Therefore should we have all 3 points and Millwall none ???????

    How's about a replay !!
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,560
    Errr! Sam was not facing the goal and there were defenders ahead of him, def a penalty not a red. The right decision and maybe if they had had all 11 players we might have been less complacent and won, or not!!!
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    Turners ban extended for frivilous appealing now that stinks
  • johnnybev1987
    johnnybev1987 Posts: 11,410
    i honestly couldnt care on this one, im bored with the millwall threads can u tell? :-)
  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    And rightly so.

    as fror turner i'm sorry that was a red for me. I know everyone has been saying he wasn't looking at the man blah blah leqading with the elbow like that is just not on I'm sorry. he could have fractured barry's skull. I think after the chris morgan iain hume incident the FA are always going to crack donw on these deliberate or not.
  • 101
    101 Posts: 2,456
    What was the point in having the game then if they are just going to turn round and change things might as well have not bothered playing saturday any goals you wanna disallow fa then maybe give them the 3 points too. They celebrated like they won the FA cup so might aswel give them reason to do so.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Ledge
    Ledge Posts: 7,179
    it was the Samir Nasri stamp thats annoyed me. Steve Beennet reckons if he'd have seen it he wouldn't have given a red card. What a lying ****
  • itsmyball
    itsmyball Posts: 300
    who cares
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,070
    [cite]Posted By: itsmyball[/cite]who cares
    Exactly
  • 101
    101 Posts: 2,456
    Yea right this is a CAFC forum about CAFC we are a league one club i couldnt care less about anything Arsenal related.

Categories

“Marketplace”