Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Welling preview on the o/s
Clem_Snide
Posts: 11,759
Why did they bother? 90% of it is a rehash of the AFC Wimbledon report.
With a couple of lines saying Jackson, Doc and the triallists might be involved.
Pointless.
With a couple of lines saying Jackson, Doc and the triallists might be involved.
Pointless.
0
Comments
-
I understand playing triallists but is a bloke released by Hayes & Yeading really going to be good enough ? Or a keeper from Basingstoke ?0
-
Its all about the hit count, they're looking for new sponsors and advertisers for the website remember !0
-
Probably not, same goes for Sawyer who Barnet released. Guess it's just about having a look at a possibility, they fill the gaps until we make more signings. Otherwise we'd be playing another 3/4 u18 players. Occasionally they might impress.[cite]Posted By: LargeAddick[/cite]I understand playing triallists but is a bloke released by Hayes & Yeading really going to be good enough ? Or a keeper from Basingstoke ?
Although in some cases could they be on trial from their clubs. Chris Dickson and Dorian Smith originally played for the reserves while on trial before we signed them.0 -
does it really matter in the bigger scheme of things,.
People are never happy unless they have something to moan about0 -
Henry will point out that people will moan if there's no preview!0
-
[cite]Posted By: LargeAddick[/cite]I understand playing triallists but is a bloke released by Hayes & Yeading really going to be good enough ? Or a keeper from Basingstoke ?
Actually the Hayes guy, Gulley, was our best player in the 2nd half vs Wimbledon and he wasn't released but was playing without a contract. Google him and several match reports have him as their best player (although they have him as a midfielder) one suggests he is their only player who could make it in the league. He is only 21 and obviously feels he can better himself. I'd rather a good young up and coming player than a has-been on his way down.0 -
Who knows, we get another Arthur Turner...0
-
[cite]Posted By: Clem_Snide[/cite]Why did they bother? 90% of it is a rehash of the AFC Wimbledon report.
With a couple of lines saying Jackson, Doc and the triallists might be involved.
Pointless.
You're right - probably best if they don't bother updating the site at all until we get taken over or win the champions league eh!
I mean every league game is similar to the last so no need to report on them.[cite]Posted By: leftbehind[/cite]does it really matter in the bigger scheme of things,.
People are never happy unless they have something to moan about
THIS!0 -
Swisdom.......
Or they could update it with a preview of the forthcoming game and not a report of the last match.0 -
thought we might have got some squad news by now. If Doherty, Jackson, McCormack arn't playing it's hardly worth going. Hope that at least to see Bauza play.0





