Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jason Euell - Signs a 1yr deal

245

Comments

  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,362
    Great signing both as a striker/midfielder in reserve and as an experienced player to have in the changing room and on the training ground
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    I'm pleased to see him back - generally, we have a young squad, so a bit of experience is what we need, especially since we let Dailly go.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,001
    I personally hope we keep Benno. I really think he can do a job for us this season, if given the chance to.
    Agree but still think he'll be moved on.  Same with Francis.
    Really Henry? Sounded like Powell was pleased to keep him when the Notts County deal fell through.
  • Good signing - versatile, hard worker, loads of experience.

    Am surprised he's only 34 - when Euell first played for us seems like another age!

  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,785
    Very clever of the club. He made it clear a while back that he was interested in returning. The club allowed him to continue training and waited until his fitness was there before signing him, thus saving a months wages. :-)
  • stilladdicted
    stilladdicted Posts: 4,307

    Agree with this, plus it's good to welcome back a fans favourite. 

    I'm pleased to see him back - generally, we have a young squad, so a bit of experience is what we need, especially since we let Dailly go.

  • falconwood_1
    falconwood_1 Posts: 7,368
    Pleased about this.
    Guess that's us done with strikers then?
    Still think one more will come in.
    I hope so, can see him linking with BWP, but not the other two.
  • on the o/s it says 'remains the clubs second most expensive signing'

     

    who was more?!

  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    Very clever of the club. He made it clear a while back that he was interested in returning. The club allowed him to continue training and waited until his fitness was there before signing him, thus saving a months wages. :-)
    Whilst ensuring that the fitness would indeed come back!
  • on the o/s it says 'remains the clubs second most expensive signing'

     

    who was more?!

    Wasn't it Soul Man Diawara?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Darren Bent cost us the most.
  • adamtheaddick
    adamtheaddick Posts: 8,664
    image
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,386
    Not sure where Euell fits in but not complaining, we have plenty of options in midfield now (apart from perhaps no natural LM if Jackson is unavailable) and another option up front.
    obviusly not the pacy striker Michael Sater was talking about after the Millwall game..........hopefully still another one to come in - probably a loanee,


    Slater said we wanted both pace and a targetman.

    Now we have Euell I can't see room for two more strikers, even if Benson leaves.

    I think there will be times when we need the options of a pacey striker and a strong targetman.
  • Leroy Ambrose
    Leroy Ambrose Posts: 14,437
    Pleased with this. Don't expect him to play regularly, but his experience will be invaluable in replacing Dailly's, and when he does play, he'll chip in with goals as well. Excellent move by the club.
  • JJ21
    JJ21 Posts: 144

    Do you think we completed this deal as the Shlupp move wont go ahead now?

     

  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957

    on the o/s it says 'remains the clubs second most expensive signing'

     

    who was more?!

    Claus Jensen

























  • Hope it works out for him.......
    Him and BWP/Hayes, look a good combination. 
    Wonder if he will play behind BWP.
    Be surprissed if Benson stays, now we seem to have quite a large squad, so can see a couple going.....

















  • Floyd Montana
    Floyd Montana Posts: 3,730
    Perfect.
    CP really has got the ingredients in place for a tasty League 1 meal.
    Loving the blend of the best of the old staples and the best available new spices.
    Youth and experience together, with a trainee master chef.

    Bon appetit Charlton!
  • Folev the red
    Folev the red Posts: 2,087
    Not only does this website say euell cost us over 6million, but apparently darren bent went for 22milion

    http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/charlton-athletic/transferrekorde/verein_358.html

    Some people....
  • barstool
    barstool Posts: 1,352

    Looked good a Bromley, had a big smile on his face and when the boys were warming down he looked the part. Great addition although his goals have dried up a bit in the higher leagues recently hope this will change with a club that really will support him


  • Sponsored links:



  • Do you think we completed this deal as the Shlupp move wont go ahead now?

     


    That crossed my mind too.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    My memory is that Euell cost us £4.75 million

    Claus Jensen £5 million
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    edited August 2011
    Bent cost us 2.5 million. Not sure who the most expensive signing was though. I thought it was Euell at 4.75 million. Jensen was 4 million. Please someone correct  me if i'm wrong.
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    got my facts from wiki!
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,785
    got my facts from wiki!
    And there's your weakness..........;-)
  • Darren Bents add on clauses made the fee up to around 5 million i think
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,535
    The handbook shows Darren Bent at over £5M - I guess it includes the share that Ipswich got when we sold him on to Spurs?

    Delighted Euell is back - really looking forward to seeing him in our red and white again!!
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,038
    Darren Bent   £5,175,000
    Jason Euell £4,750,000
    Claus Jensen £4,000,000
  • dabos
    dabos Posts: 2,715
    Bent's deal was in instalments, and I believe had a clause for England debut. Definitely > £5m in total.

    Jensen cost us £4m.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,957
    edited August 2011
    The handbook shows Darren Bent at over £5M - I guess it includes the share that Ipswich got when we sold him on to Spurs?

    Must have done, Weegie ...... because he signed for £2.5 million from Ipswich,with their getting a 20% cut of any transfer fee over that figure when he was sold on.