Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Woolwich Ferry Roundabout
Comments
-
OhMyGodden said:iainment said:TelMc32 said:iainment said:I’m a resident of the borough and I’m very happy that cycling is being taken seriously by the council.
Win win I think.
*(This was in response to an alarmist article in the Telegraph where a reporter claimed to have witnessed 170ish(?) red light breaches by cyclists in central London during 'field research'. Contrary to popular interpretations against cyclists the 'research' could be used to support the view that cyclists should be given a priority for safe moving off when lights are red, e.g. left turn when no traffic).1 -
Most of the wazzock cyclists in Charlton and Greenwich don't use the existing cycle lane and choose to cycle down the road anyway, so it's all a bit of a waste of time0
-
iainment said:TelMc32 said:iainment said:I’m a resident of the borough and I’m very happy that cycling is being taken seriously by the council.
Win win I think.1 -
Isn’t this going to give a segregated cycle lane from Woolwich to Tower Hill? If so happy days.
1 -
Crusty54 said:arthur said:cafckev said:We already struggle to make progress in our Ambulance when on blue lights between Charlton and the Woolwich flyover because of the single lane in each direction because the buses stopping on the road.
I bet the 20 or so bikes that will use those cycle lanes will be very happy though, so that’s ok.
I may have to try to get a Road tax rebate at this rate because we are losing Road space at pace. Maybe it’s time to make cyclists pay to use the roads seen as though they are getting more and more tarmac now days.
It may be in jest, but, suggesting cyclist pay "road" tax is a daft argument. Apart from road tax doesn't actually exist.... It's unenforceable even if it was introduced and would cost more to run the system than it would raise. Traffic problems in London are down too many cars. As for your point on road space... LOL!0