Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Would you accept a change to the naming of the ground……

I.E.   The Red Bull Valley if it meant a huge investment injection?
«1

Comments

  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,766
    Depends on how huge is huge and how that money would be used.
    To me it would always be The Valley.
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 4,890
    Guardy said:
    I.E.   The Red Bull Valley if it meant a huge investment injection?
    But it likely wouldn’t be an injection rather a means to offset running costs for the owners. 

    Unless we get a fresh wave of enthusiasm from the ‘consortium’ to persuade them to throw cash at us it wouldn’t likely change much on the pitch I’d imagine. 
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,127
    No
  • Yes. I would call it The Valley anyway.  Even if it went towards offsetting losses.  But would need to be a meaningful sum.
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,978
    The Toughsheet Valley.
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,467
    I mean no but like...I'm bracing myself for it happening anyway. 
  • No 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,227
    Already been considered by the club and discussed at length here

    https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/99462/sponsors-wanted-for-25-26-season/p1

    It hasn't happened.
  • No .

    its The Valley,   Nothing else.

    Thought our owners were rich?
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,359
    Yes. 

    Everyone would still call it the Valley anyway, and it would be better to be a competitive club than slide back down to league 1 eventually, which happens to all clubs who don't receive cash injections or receive serious investment
  • Sponsored links:



  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,857
    Yes. 

    Everyone will call it The Valley apart from media and the club 
  • 2121
    2121 Posts: 1,189
    Yes. 

    Everyone would still call it the Valley anyway, and it would be better to be a competitive club than slide back down to league 1 eventually, which happens to all clubs who don't receive cash injections or receive serious investment
    +1
  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,766
    My argument would always be a case of how gutted would we be if they then moved on to the scumbags in Bermondsey and turned them into a decent Premier League outfit while we're languishing below?
  • Yes
  • It'll always be the Valley to me... I pretty much still call, or think of all stadiums by their original name, which for Bolton > the Reebok Stadium for example is quite ironic given that was a sponsored one too. 

    Same with Arsenal, that'll always be the Emirates 
  • We don't even own the place
  • Where has all this come from ffs, It's THE VALLEY and always will be...end of
  • jose
    jose Posts: 622
    Our Food - Yeo Valley Organic
  • fattmatt
    fattmatt Posts: 581
    What is in a name? A rose by any other would smell so sweet. 

    Tbh I wouldn't like it, but I'd get over it. 
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,859
    edited September 24
    No, no and no. Never.
  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,562
    Guardy said:
    I.E.   The Red Bull Valley if it meant a huge investment injection?
    Define ‘huge’.
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,355
    I have always dreamt of The Valley being renamed to The LNER 4468 Mallard Valley.


  • wolfgang
    wolfgang Posts: 388
    I would be in favour if I got a slice of the money.
  • gringo
    gringo Posts: 582
    edited September 24
    "The McCains 12 chip stadium"

    Take the money, spend it, and carry on calling it the Valley anyway.
  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,657
    No, absolutely not. I also realise this happens at many clubs and will more than likely happen to us at some point and we won't be able to do sod all about it.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,145
    Stadium naming rights are the not the nailed on money-spinner many of you assume it is.

    For evidence of that just look across the river, to the London Stadium.

    What's more "the Valley" is more closely associated with the club than most stadiium names thanks to recent history which is still regularly referred to on TV commentaries. Any potential sponsor would be mindful of that.

    So I don't think the question should arise until we are an established FAPL club again. Then I could live with "Red Bull welcomes you to The Valley".
  • YTS1978
    YTS1978 Posts: 1,703
    Yes. 

    Everyone would still call it the Valley anyway, and it would be better to be a competitive club than slide back down to league 1 eventually, which happens to all clubs who don't receive cash injections or receive serious investment
    This
  • bertpalmer
    bertpalmer Posts: 1,774
    I knew it was RedBull
  • mascot88
    mascot88 Posts: 9,616
    No - 

    Unless it was big time and we needed to balance PSR - We would need to be in a division higher for that to become relevant
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,741
    Depends how big the investment was and as long as The Valley is still in the name .