Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

2026 Pre-Season Thread - fixture list (1st post) - Reading MATCH THREAD Sat 2:15pm (p56)

1383941434481

Comments

  • TheHerminator
    TheHerminator Posts: 1,330
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 6,570
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
    Honestly not wanting to start a pile on regarding Miles but in all seriousness if he doesn’t show a massive improvement this season how many more do we wait in the hope that it happens ?
  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 2,288
    edited July 26
    AndyG said:
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
    Honestly not wanting to start a pile on regarding Miles but in all seriousness if he doesn’t show a massive improvement this season how many more do we wait in the hope that it happens ?
    They need to decide what type of striker they want him to be, as in do they want him to be more of a box player or someone linking the play and accepting not scoring as many?  I think he is caught between the two and doing neither good enough.
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 28,442
    Sword65pf said:
    AndyG said:
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
    Honestly not wanting to start a pile on regarding Miles but in all seriousness if he doesn’t show a massive improvement this season how many more do we wait in the hope that it happens ?
    They need to decide what type of striker they want him to be, as in fo they want him to be more of a box player or someone linking the play and accepting not scoring as many?  I think he is caught between the two and doing neither good enough.
    He’s not a hold up player or number nine, despite his build. He needs to be running onto balls or getting crosses infront of him. 
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 5,425
    All pre season games should be behind close doors…. Cause today fans are must win at all costs and in a world of failure or success they are not use to the old Testimonial type games and that how these were played  and the lack of importance they just don’t get ..

  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 2,288
    edited July 26
    All pre season games should be behind close doors…. Cause today fans are must win at all costs and in a world of failure or success they are not use to the old Testimonial type games and that how these were played  and the lack of importance they just don’t get ..

    So everyone can play shit, show no ambition to prove you should be in the team and still expect to be picked? Nobody on here has mentioned the result it was the type of performance which looked like the majority couldn’t give a fuck, leading to proving what most of us think we need and in turn discussing it. 
  • AndyG
    AndyG Posts: 6,570
    Sword65pf said:
    All pre season games should be behind close doors…. Cause today fans are must win at all costs and in a world of failure or success they are not use to the old Testimonial type games and that how these were played  and the lack of importance they just don’t get ..

    So everyone can play shit, show no ambition to prove you should be in the team and still expect to be picked? Nobody on here has mentioned the result it was the type of performance which looked like the majority couldn’t give a fuck, leading to proving what most of us think we need and in turn discussing it. 
    Obviously psf should be about getting some fitness and trying new styles / players and I suppose our have met that purpose but has anyone noticed Wrexham played Man Utd last week and Leeds this week I suggest a slightly different approach lol
  • DOUCHER
    DOUCHER Posts: 8,952
    Never one to be too bothered by pre season but we are clearly mincing around as a club and have a swuad that has relegation written all over it .
    all well and good trying to progress budget wise on a minge of a budget but unless you spend the bucks the chickens  will come home to roost eventually and we dodged the bullet last year but we may not be as lucky this season .
    why bother owner a club if you’re just happy to guff around bottom of championship at best 
    Totally agree - the window has been extremely disappointing and a lot needs to happen in the next 2/3 weeks - fleming talking about grant and macnamara missing half a pre season and the consequences - doesn't strike me as good planning / ideal window - sick of having half arsed owners - apparently we should be grateful they aren't as bad as the last lot etc. I get that but doesn't mean i'm happy when other clubs have owners who invest significantly more. Weren't impressed last year when it was said they get more excited about the women's team. THey need gto startr getting excited about the mens team and start opening their wallets. We've brought in the punts and the cover, lets now have some much needed and much talked about quality - all down to the owners stumping up now. 
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 17,448
    I really enjoy watching the academy teams when often it isn’t all about winning. But they have a style of play and attempt to pass to each other / work to be a team. Is that too much to hope for in a PSF? 
  • redbuttle
    redbuttle Posts: 2,153
    Sword65pf said:
    AndyG said:
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
    Honestly not wanting to start a pile on regarding Miles but in all seriousness if he doesn’t show a massive improvement this season how many more do we wait in the hope that it happens ?
    They need to decide what type of striker they want him to be, as in fo they want him to be more of a box player or someone linking the play and accepting not scoring as many?  I think he is caught between the two and doing neither good enough.
    He’s not a hold up player or number nine, despite his build. He needs to be running onto balls or getting crosses infront of him. 
    After that performance I don't think he understands the word running. He was wandering about looking totally disinterested. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • thickandthin63
    thickandthin63 Posts: 3,181
    Sword65pf said:
    AndyG said:
    If Wimbledon had been the Championship side and us the League one, you would have said it was a comfortable win against lower league opposition. Only Leaburn did himself justice.

    Leaburn was atrocious yesterday? 
    Honestly not wanting to start a pile on regarding Miles but in all seriousness if he doesn’t show a massive improvement this season how many more do we wait in the hope that it happens ?
    They need to decide what type of striker they want him to be, as in do they want him to be more of a box player or someone linking the play and accepting not scoring as many?  I think he is caught between the two and doing neither good enough


    Carl had the same situation,Lennie brought him in at a very young age,he was basically a foil for whoever played alongside him,but never a prolific goal scorer.Miles does tend to drift out to the right,but surely we need him in the middle to either win the ball for his mates or even score,we dont need 6ft 5in wingers.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 48,434
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 72,847
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 36,413
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 
  • mart77
    mart77 Posts: 5,968
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 
    They may but I’d say it won’t be for too long if they do. DM and Grant haven’t had a full pre-season according to Saturday’s interview. Don’t know about Alli. 
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 21,119
    mart77 said:
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 
    They may but I’d say it won’t be for too long if they do. DM and Grant haven’t had a full pre-season according to Saturday’s interview. Don’t know about Alli. 
    Alli has been training but no game time (I think). That kind of works though as we might start to see some players playing 75 minutes, leaving 15 for the new signings.

    I also wouldn't be surprised if we have a behind closed doors match lined up at some point around the Cheltenham game
  • AS1987
    AS1987 Posts: 178
    Has anybody received their Reading ticket yet? Reading and Cheltenham Town were supposed to be physical tickets, but I haven't received either.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,249
    AS1987 said:
    Has anybody received their Reading ticket yet? Reading and Cheltenham Town were supposed to be physical tickets, but I haven't received either.
    I’ve received Cheltenham (not going to reading) 
  • FishCostaFortune
    FishCostaFortune Posts: 11,337
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 36,413
    edited July 27
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Gisappointed
    Gisappointed Posts: 1,362
    By all accounts the squad would have had a high intensity morning training session.  Perhaps the least impressive vs AFCW were the hardest triers. 
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 53,100
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 36,413
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
    Yeah, like Ben Reeves did. I will never forget that saga and his (non) performances that season showed.

    My negotiations to a player would be.....

    Sign by the date pre-season starts = £x pa
    Sign by the time players get back from training camp = £×-10% pa
    Sign 2 weeks after this = £x-20%pa


  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 36,413
    By all accounts the squad would have had a high intensity morning training session.  Perhaps the least impressive vs AFCW were the hardest triers. 
    Would like this confirmed as I feel this was mooted by someone on here & then someone else picked it up & ran with it. 
  • JohnnyH2
    JohnnyH2 Posts: 5,541
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
    Yeah, like Ben Reeves did. I will never forget that saga and his (non) performances that season showed.

    My negotiations to a player would be.....

    Sign by the date pre-season starts = £x pa
    Sign by the time players get back from training camp = £×-10% pa
    Sign 2 weeks after this = £x-20%pa


    So by telling  the player and the agent what your next moves will be if they dont sign they go off and use those figurres to get a better deal at another club
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,751
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
    Yeah, like Ben Reeves did. I will never forget that saga and his (non) performances that season showed.

    My negotiations to a player would be.....

    Sign by the date pre-season starts = £x pa
    Sign by the time players get back from training camp = £×-10% pa
    Sign 2 weeks after this = £x-20%pa


    And the negotiation from the player/agent would be to laugh and hang up the phone.
  • FinlandMatt
    FinlandMatt Posts: 51
    edited July 28
    First live pre season game for me this season. 
    Heading up by train.

    Looking forward to it.
  • Redrobo
    Redrobo Posts: 11,469
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
    Yeah, like Ben Reeves did. I will never forget that saga and his (non) performances that season showed.

    My negotiations to a player would be.....

    Sign by the date pre-season starts = £x pa
    Sign by the time players get back from training camp = £×-10% pa
    Sign 2 weeks after this = £x-20%pa


    Maybe a better idea is to have a second “ pre season” during the September International break for all the late joiners who did not have one and the returning from injury group that missed out. Add in some youngsters to make up the numbers.
    Surely it would help players avoid injuries by being fitter and improve performance.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,249
    It doesn't bother me that we lost. It was offensively we were toothless and players just wanted to make simple passes. You want a few clues that we might be able to score goals. Jones was not happy apprently, so fans are entitled not to be either.
    A shame we didn't hear NJ after the game, as that would have been interesting, as NJ isn't someone who can hide is feelings.

    Colchester tomorrow, it'll be interesting who plays, as you'd imagine the probable "starting 11" will play more minutes at Reading on Saturday.
    I would like to think all 3 of the most recent signings get some game time tomorrow evening. If not then what's the point. We already have 4 or 5 injured players who don't look like starting the season......but we keep on signing players that arent fit.

    I say every season (and get laughed at). Got to get players in for pre-season & certainly here for the intensive week away. 

    You get laughed at because you make it sound as though you're the only one who's thought of it, and that it should be a given that it happens. 

    It's obvious that getting all players in before the pre-season camp is the ideal scenario.

    The reality, though, is that the transfer market rarely works like that. Every club would love to have their business done early, but negotiations, player decisions, and selling clubs' demands often make it impossible. 
    Grant and McNamara were free agents......and probably were from about the 2nd week of May.  If we wanted them I'm sure they could have been had much earlier than last week. Which convinces me that both weren't on our "wishlist". 
    The trouble is you live in football fantasy land, where you think Charlton ring a player up and he pops down and signs for us with little delay.  
    Many fans (though not enough) understand the complexities, the negotiations, the personal and family issues and the fact that many players will wait towards the end of the window before making up their mind.
    Yeah, like Ben Reeves did. I will never forget that saga and his (non) performances that season showed.

    My negotiations to a player would be.....

    Sign by the date pre-season starts = £x pa
    Sign by the time players get back from training camp = £×-10% pa
    Sign 2 weeks after this = £x-20%pa


    Unless you are overpaying them with the first offer you wouldn’t sign anyone 

    If the club wanted to do all their business before pre-season starts they’d either need to overpay for every player or sign players that aren’t good enough so jump at the chance to play for us. 

    If you want to sign good players, and not overpay for them, you have to be patient 
  • Fumbluff
    Fumbluff Posts: 10,533
    Was gonna go to this one as it’s now nearby for me but all the bed wetting has convinced me I can’t be arsed instead