1 of the rumours in the papers over the last couple of days was the players unhappy at bullyboy training tactics.
i posted at the start of the season, after talking to a palace fan that dowie played people out of position and had an extraordinary amount of muscle injuries especially hamstring strains in his squad.
do you think that harbin, being the performance coach could be part of the problem with both the injuries and the reported players still being unhappy?
0
Comments
wasn't harbin at palace?
definitely stories of hard training, with various muscle injuries from the palace lot though, i'll grant that.
Those are exactly the type of exercises that worried me, because they tend to work one muscle group harder than the other. That imbalance needs to be corrected to avoid an increased risk of injury.
I think the difference is less clear than you might think. there was something recently I read that stated footballers are sprinting at near top speed for a lot more of the game than they used to. There still needs to be a good level of aerobic fitness for the players but the sprinting ability is becoming more important.
The main difference I would see is the upper body strength requirements of football are less than in the case of Rugby. whilst still important there is less of an issue.
and it is not a case really of needing overly powerful hamstrings it is making sure that the quads and hamstrings are developed equally.
I think some of the thoughts on the training methods are attracting unfair criticism, as none of us know the weight that is put on them. If they are mere supplementing tools used to keep training fresh and varied, then no problem at all. If however they were given prominence then that is a problem.
Wearing gloves?