I was pretty impressed by Forest. Thought they looked very, very good going forward in the first half especially, and were always a threat in the second.
I agree they looked quite good going forward but I wouldn't describe them, as you do, as being 'very very' good....that's stretching it somewhat.... to say the least!
Now, Wolves 'were' very very good!
Fair enough, we'll just have to have a different opinion on that one. From my view they were pretty impressive up front, though shaky at the back. Earnshaw coming off was a bit of a bonus as he was dangerous, as was Tyson.
As you say, we'll just have to have a difference of opinion....I thought they looked better at the back than up front...big strong fast mobile defenders who covered the ground well for the most part and most of what they did going forward stemmed from the back four.Their mid-field and defence seemed to merge into one more often than not, making it somewhat indistinguishable.
I don't think the report lived up to the Headline. I actually think the report itself was pretty accurate but didn't give the impression of any great fluency by Forest other than maybe the first 15 minutes.
Yeah, the SLP is a Millwall paper in general terms but saying that, we do give Charlton the same amount of coverage on the inside pages as Millwall (2 pages on a Friday, 1 on a Tuesday), but we tend to always lead with Millwall unless something dramatic happens at Charlton or Palace.
If we get decent Charlton stories I try and stick them on the web cos I can usually do them bigger, rather than cram them into a small space in the paper.
[cite]Posted By: rk_1990[/cite]Yeah, the SLP is a Millwall paper in general terms but saying that, we do give Charlton the same amount of coverage on the inside pages as Millwall (2 pages on a Friday, 1 on a Tuesday), but we tend to always lead with Millwall unless something dramatic happens at Charlton or Palace.
- Must be quite boring then, nothing about football, maybe a few lines nicked from the Court Circular, copied from Britains most wanted, or borrowed from Insolvancy Weekly?
Comments
Was I at the same game?
Now, Wolves 'were' very very good!
this is the Millwall London Press BRE - What do you expect. :-)
sorry mate but you are a millwall paper
If we get decent Charlton stories I try and stick them on the web cos I can usually do them bigger, rather than cram them into a small space in the paper.
;-)
Lol.
- Must be quite boring then, nothing about football, maybe a few lines nicked from the Court Circular, copied from Britains most wanted, or borrowed from Insolvancy Weekly?