Call of Duty: World at War

Valley11

For those who have got it - as good as Call of Duty: Modern Warfare?

Dazzler21

No, but runs close.

Harry Monk

its better, wicked single player and multiplayer actually,

I have it on the PC need a bit of a beast to run it though.

Medders

I'd say it's very much the same. Game play is very similar, just obviously the setting is WW2 rather than modern...

Still a great game though

cafcpolo

DEFINATELY not as good. Single player no where near the same standard, the sniping level sucks balls compared to modern warfare.

Only played three games online so far but quite enjoyed that. Three quality maps...Not as good but well worth getting if your a fan.

Medders

[cite]Posted By: cafcpolo[/cite]DEFINATELY not as good. Single player no where near the same standard, the sniping level sucks balls compared to modern warfare.

Only played three games online so far but quite enjoyed that. Three quality maps...Not as good but well worth getting if your a fan.

Hardly suprising... didnt have a Barrett .50 during WW2 did they!

Stu_of_Kunming

Can't buy this atm, as I feel C&C 3 is stealing far to much of my time as it is.

cafcpolo

Ha-ha...It just wasn't 'snipey' enough, too much rushing around, being seen, etc. I enjoyed creeping up behind some geezer in the last one & stabbing him in the neck.

Medders

[quote][cite]Posted By: cafcpolo[/cite]Ha-ha...It just wasn't 'snipey' enough, too much rushing around, being seen, etc. I enjoyed creeping up behind some geezer in the last one & stabbing him in the neck.[/quote]

Can do that later... especially against the Japanese...