Here's one for you all, something to get you thinking about something less gloomy.
Why is it that single and two digit bus numbers are referred to as a number (e.g. 54 = Fifty-four; 89 = Eighty-nine; 25 = Twenty-five) whereas three digit bus numbers are referred to by individual digits (e.g. 321 = three, two, one; 161 = one, six, one; 521 = Five, two, one)?????
Then, just to prove there's an exception to every rule, why is the 160 that runs from Sidcup to Catford known not as the "one, six, oh" or the "one hundred and sixty", but as the "one-sixty". What's that all about then?
Anyone else got any interesting bus number observations they would like to share with the group?
;o)
0
Comments
please, for the love of god, edit that part of your post!!!
That's all I have to say about buses.
Think you've hit the nail on the head. In every example given people choose the way that has the least number of syllables; I know because I've counted. I'll get me coat, its an anorak.
bus one six one fast kill bus two six two but not one sixty.....
weird. never thought about it before, but thanks to off-it for bringing it to everyone's attention!
(Admittedly, it was a low starting point anyway)
Well I've always found that old people refer to the 108 as the "Hundred and Eight" as opposed to 1-0-8.
They also tend to say 5 and 20 past the hour rather than 25 past etc, and also call New Years Eve "Old Years Night"
Back to buses, I miss the old 21 route. I used to be able to get all the way home from the City on it before the new 321 was introduced.
Back in the day, I used to get one of the very old type 89 buses from Welling Corner to the Fox under the Hill.
Halfway up Shooters Hill the old bus would start wheezing and spluttering - and on a good day we'd come charging triumphantly over the brow at 5mph and then free rolling unstoppable downhill.
Ah yes, the old "Ted Rogers" just isn't the same.
Fug me, how old are these old people? ;-)
Sorry,sorry,sorry.
Just gotta know, How Many ?
Never been a fan of the 75 though.