Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

was marcus bent that bad

at the risk of raising some eye brows i dont see why bent has got so many enemys.his goal tally was'nt up to much but then his in good company there.but i thought he held the ball up well.maybe a bit of a big head tho

Comments

  • Options
    ****palace fan alert****
  • Options
    3 goals in 53 games - you do the math.
  • Options
    what has leaburn got to do with him?
  • Options
    Officer Dibb , go look in some other dustbins
  • Options
    Leaburn was a legend

    Bent was a leg-end
  • Options
    similar players in my opinion
  • Options
    yes, he was totally shit
  • Options
    it was trite when you started and now it's tiresome and tedious.

    Give it up now, you were rumbled long ago
  • Options
    so lazy cant remember him running (on the pitch)
  • Options
    edited March 2009
    he never did anything that well, dreadful first touch, poor shot, not much physical presence and rarely won a ball in the air - that enough for ya? Made Matt Svenson look OK..
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    TBF he looked alright in the first few games of last season.

    He would've been our top scorer if we played him all year.
  • Options
    I'd have him in the side ahead of Deon Burton any game of the season.
  • Options
    Oh dear, I fear Chris is right.

    Was Marcus Bent really that bad? No, he was worse than that.

    Is he better than Deon Burton? Immeasurably.

    That's where we are now, though.
  • Options
    Ok,so we launch a hate campaign against Deon Burton and carry it on for a few years after he has left us then?
  • Options
    No, I don't think so, Tommo, because Deon isn't a lazy good-for-nothing lout, like Bent.

    He's just not very good at scoring goals.
  • Options
    edited March 2009
    [quote][cite]Posted By: oohaahmortimer[/cite]****palace fan alert****[/quote]

    Was Ron Noades good for Crystal Palace? Was Perry Suckling unlucky at Anfield in 1989?
    In answer to the question tho- Yes
  • Options
    At £30k a week he was bad. If he was on the same as Dickson or Fleetwood then you'd probably say he was ok. We'd be a better team at present with him in the side but it's all about the money.
  • Options
    if he was on more than 20k a week i'd be surprised
  • Options
    Whatever he was earning...it was too much.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!