Flyod the course reg numbers were D 208 and D206 may well be numbered slighlty differant now but if you look under the sections "diplomas" you will find them. They where there last year as i had a query re ongoing idea i have and looked to se ifthey could count (points wise) to another course etc.
Just for yours and my cyber stalker BFRs gob i will take a copy etc to the Tranmere game and im sure someone who will be there above all this and totaly trustworthy will verify.
I'm not sure whether to be embaressed at the cringey bravado you'd expect to find on a Millwall forum, or be amused by how panto this BFR V GH thing has become
so come on Sussex ? how do you expect me to respond when i try to make light of the insult on line 383 and me comes back with worse a few lines later ?
I have siad that im happy to prove the issues the Flyod said earlier ? not sure what the f**k it has to do with some cyber stalker siting in his yfronts , maybe Burt never responded on the chat line when BFR asked him "what are you wearing tonight ?" and his a tad niffed off.
[cite]Posted By: Goonerhater[/cite]thing is i can prove what i have done and where i have been BFR you on the other hand still gob off behind your key board with nothing at all to back your super IQ other than sit/shit in your yfronts day in day out in front of the WWW you have been nowhere and done f**k all. Strange how when you so clearly ALWAYS loose the arguement that you result in your usual insults re spelling etc etc etc etc . Surely if you have a much better grasp of the language etc you would be able to win an agruement with one such as me a clear numb skull ? i think the reason you result to your petty insults thrown at me is the fact that you realise that not only have i actually lived a life , that i have proved myself by geting quailified (inmy own time), that i have paid for my house before i was 50, that i own my own company, etcetc etc. You on the otherhand just have cyber girl friend who is probably a 16stone guy called burt from Hull.
you a pup with totaly no spine.
Do me a favour lend me your brain, I'm building an idiot.
[cite]Posted By: Goonerhater[/cite]so come on Sussex ? how do you expect me to respond when i try to make light of the insult on line 383 and me comes back with worse a few lines later ?
I have siad that im happy to prove the issues the Flyod said earlier ? not sure what the f**k it has to do with some cyber stalker siting in his yfronts , maybe Burt never responded on the chat line when BFR asked him "what are you wearing tonight ?" and his a tad niffed off.
No idea mate, kiss and make up?
I guess you could just ignore it. If you just see BFR as a keyboard warrior, just ignore it and don't get too riled when he's being a bit of a wind up merchant
BFR and I find ourselves at the opposite end of the specrum quite frequently but I respect the fact that he is an intelligent guy and has thought about his views even if I disagree with them.
That is why it is such a shame he so frequently resorts to the personal stuff and gets AFKA's trigger finger twitching. He has the ability to be bigger than that.
As for Goonerhater he has told us before of his dyslexia and a symptom of dyslexia is that messages can sometimes come out reading strangely. It does NOT mean a lack of intelligence and frankly nitpicking over his spelling etc is a lazy response in my opinion. Address the thrust of his arguments not the finer points of literary style. This isn't the Oxford Union after all!
The scum are those who have kids. You can pretty much fly across the Atlantic eight times a week for the damage having a kid causes. Less bad than having a kid is having a pet. Any eco-warrior who has a cat (they all do) I tell to kill their cat before they can possibly preach to me. They swiftly f*** off. Hippocritical scum of the earth.
[cite]Posted By: floydandharvey[/cite]The scum are those who have kids. You can pretty much fly across the Atlantic eight times a week for the damage having a kid causes. Less bad than having a kid is having a pet. Any eco-warrior who has a cat (they all do) I tell to kill their cat before they can possibly preach to me. They swiftly f*** off. Hippocritical scum of the earth.
Fuck's sake. That's enough - let's leave the hippos out of this alright?
[cite]Posted By: RalphMilnesgut[/cite]No use complaining about name calling and verbal attacks in a thread called 'Climate ChangeScum, Again'.
I agree absolutely, however, as you'll have seen in the preceding page it seems that whenever one side of the argument in particular appears to be losing over a point it does resort very quickly to personal attacks. I know for a fact, because one or two have whispered me, that there must be others out there that are currently reluctant to post in support of some of my own views because they know they'll be next in the firing line. That's not a healthy situation.
I can't be bothered to go back through the numerous posts on here to come up with a list of the things I've been called and ideas I've negatively and wrongly branded with but it would be a very long list.
In return I've tried to respond with respect and good humour (and admittedly a degree of sarcasm on occasion). For instance trying to bring out the degree of hypocrisy and "Nimbyism" that exists around this issue. Result? I get called 'thick' for having a view different to the poster. Again.
That really is it for me on this thread now I think I'll just stick to posting on whether Dickson's the new messiah or just plain crap...
Like the final days on Easter Island, the thread disintegrates, sadly.
In case any of you enjoy looking at amazing photos taken from the Space Shuttle and various satellites, this site may interest you. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=9103. You can use image of the day and its search option, or use the general topics for more detail.
Obviously its from NASA so some will dismiss the commentary, but a great site for anyone with an interest and an open mind.
[cite]Posted By: Floyd Montana[/cite]Like the final days on Easter Island, the thread disintegrates, sadly.
In case any of you enjoy looking at amazing photos taken from the Space Shuttle and various satellites, this site may interest you. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=9103.
You can use image of the day and its search option, or use the general topics for more detail.
Obviously its from NASA so some will dismiss the commentary, but a great site for anyone with an interest and an open mind.
You don't really believe that we've sent people and rockets into outer space and the moon do you. Have you never seen Capricorn One? : - )
[cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]So, can someone give a summary in 100 words or less?
A more or less civil debate as to whether climate change is natural or man made with an off topic (largely civil) foray into religion and evidence of it.
Sadly things then degenerated into a personal spat as has happened all too frequently which is roughly where we are before the (amusing) title change.
Others are welcome to correct or add if they feel my summary is unfair or misrepresentative.
Hmmm tricky one. If they havent done this then the firework show they put on when I was in Florida a few years back was mighty impressive, and their model makers are just brilliant!!
Anyhow Ive got a couple of big heads to finish off - anyone care to help cutting down the last trees on the island to line the route to their resting place?
Kept out of this for a while. That is because I only operate with facts, not seen too many, I have seen lots of personal attacks on the character of certain people on here, which is bizarre. Why is this, why criticise people for their grammar (sic) is it to deflect from the tenuous arguments you put forward? Very strange, it is not the attacks, but the vitriol attached, retard, fuck wit, etc. Why? Why do you need to do this, why attack someones grammer (sic) is that the main point here. Why attack their qualifications yet when they are shown to be correct, not apologise profusely, grovel you twat, see we can all be offensive.
Personal opinion only, but there seem to be a lot of ex communists/socialists who seem to be attaching themselves to this flag as their other opinions have been run out of town, stamped on and kicked in the gutter where they belong, discuss!
[cite]Posted By: Steve Dowman[/cite]Kept out of this for a while. That is because I only operate with facts, not seen too many, I have seen lots of personal attacks on the character of certain people on here, which is bizarre. Why is this, why criticise people for their grammar (sic) is it to deflect from the tenuous arguments you put forward? Very strange, it is not the attacks, but the vitriol attached, retard, fuck wit, etc. Why? Why do you need to do this, why attack someones grammer (sic) is that the main point here. Why attack their qualifications yet when they are shown to be correct, not apologise profusely, grovel you twat, see we can all be offensive.
Personal opinion only, but there seem to be a lot of ex communists/socialists who seem to be attaching themselves to this flag as their other opinions have been run out of town, stamped on and kicked in the gutter where they belong, discuss!
You won't be saying that come the revolution, you retarded fuckwit!!!
As with all the threads that begin with good and fun debate, they normally de-rail when they get personal.
But some people (Steve Dowman, you are a prime example) seem to miss the point. If people are being called names, being made fun of, etc, they will respond. You can't really expect anything else - this is a forum full of strong-minded blokes (on the whole).
For me, the problem is the fact that the name calling etc starts in the first place. And for me, it is generally always the same person (or couple of people) who shart it off, and make the threads overly aggressive and personal. You can't really blame the others for rising to it.
[cite]Posted By: Steve Dowman[/cite]Kept out of this for a while. That is because I only operate with facts, not seen too many, I have seen lots of personal attacks on the character of certain people on here, which is bizarre. Why is this, why criticise people for their grammar (sic) is it to deflect from the tenuous arguments you put forward? Very strange, it is not the attacks, but the vitriol attached, retard, fuck wit, etc. Why? Why do you need to do this, why attack someones grammer (sic) is that the main point here. Why attack their qualifications yet when they are shown to be correct, not apologise profusely, grovel you twat, see we can all be offensive.
Personal opinion only, but there seem to be a lot of ex communists/socialists who seem to be attaching themselves to this flag as their other opinions have been run out of town, stamped on and kicked in the gutter where they belong, discuss!
LOL - you ice-pick wielding, facile climate-change denying fool )
I think you'll find that most of GH's posts on topics like this are ridiculously antagonistic - even the ones where he doesn't type as though the 'o' key on his keyboard is stuck. What generally tends to happen is some wag starts a thread on some mildly controversial subjet du jour or other, some sensible people weigh in with arguments supporting their 'side' of the argument then, when people singularly fail to see the evidence that is planted before them (or, in this case, ignore reams of evidence and highlight inaccuracies in reporting), when they're challenged on it they naturally rail at the apparently implied suggestion that they're thick. The thread then degenerates into otherwise intelligent people chucking insults at each other.
GH probably suffers from the same thing that I do - the intelligent working-class man inferiroity complex - reinforced every time some prick from a privileged background looks down on you because of the way you talk. Unfortunately for him, it's double spiteful because of his dyslexia. At least when I'm keyboard warrioring it up, the fact that I am - to all intents and purposes - Council Estate Scum isn't readily apparent.
Of course, that doesn't in any way account for the lameness of personal attacks on him (or other contibutors) from people who should definitely know better.
Perhaps if he was less antagonistic, preventing so many irrational outbursts from sallying forth there wouldnt be a problem. Isnt it as simple as that? Why try to tart it up with excuses and some kind of 'victim' role play?
What has knowing something about a subject, or having an opinion about it got to do with priviledge? Why do you have to bring priviledge into this? And why associate knowledge or understanding with priviledge and then further associate it with being a prick, as you say? Do we have to post differently because you are crossing your fingers and saying you have an (imaginary) complex? What is spiteful about responding to the abuse GH throws out?
Bewildering post Leroy. Right up there with the best of Gooner.
Comments
Just for yours and my cyber stalker BFRs gob i will take a copy etc to the Tranmere game and im sure someone who will be there above all this and totaly trustworthy will verify.
I have siad that im happy to prove the issues the Flyod said earlier ? not sure what the f**k it has to do with some cyber stalker siting in his yfronts , maybe Burt never responded on the chat line when BFR asked him "what are you wearing tonight ?" and his a tad niffed off.
Do me a favour lend me your brain, I'm building an idiot.
No idea mate, kiss and make up?
I guess you could just ignore it. If you just see BFR as a keyboard warrior, just ignore it and don't get too riled when he's being a bit of a wind up merchant
That is why it is such a shame he so frequently resorts to the personal stuff and gets AFKA's trigger finger twitching. He has the ability to be bigger than that.
As for Goonerhater he has told us before of his dyslexia and a symptom of dyslexia is that messages can sometimes come out reading strangely. It does NOT mean a lack of intelligence and frankly nitpicking over his spelling etc is a lazy response in my opinion. Address the thrust of his arguments not the finer points of literary style. This isn't the Oxford Union after all!
I agree absolutely, however, as you'll have seen in the preceding page it seems that whenever one side of the argument in particular appears to be losing over a point it does resort very quickly to personal attacks. I know for a fact, because one or two have whispered me, that there must be others out there that are currently reluctant to post in support of some of my own views because they know they'll be next in the firing line. That's not a healthy situation.
I can't be bothered to go back through the numerous posts on here to come up with a list of the things I've been called and ideas I've negatively and wrongly branded with but it would be a very long list.
In return I've tried to respond with respect and good humour (and admittedly a degree of sarcasm on occasion). For instance trying to bring out the degree of hypocrisy and "Nimbyism" that exists around this issue. Result? I get called 'thick' for having a view different to the poster. Again.
That really is it for me on this thread now I think I'll just stick to posting on whether Dickson's the new messiah or just plain crap...
:-)
Same here...Wow!
In case any of you enjoy looking at amazing photos taken from the Space Shuttle and various satellites, this site may interest you.
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=9103.
You can use image of the day and its search option, or use the general topics for more detail.
Obviously its from NASA so some will dismiss the commentary, but a great site for anyone with an interest and an open mind.
You don't really believe that we've sent people and rockets into outer space and the moon do you. Have you never seen Capricorn One? : - )
A more or less civil debate as to whether climate change is natural or man made with an off topic (largely civil) foray into religion and evidence of it.
Sadly things then degenerated into a personal spat as has happened all too frequently which is roughly where we are before the (amusing) title change.
Others are welcome to correct or add if they feel my summary is unfair or misrepresentative.
If they havent done this then the firework show they put on when I was in Florida a few years back was mighty impressive, and their model makers are just brilliant!!
Anyhow Ive got a couple of big heads to finish off - anyone care to help cutting down the last trees on the island to line the route to their resting place?
If it is the latter, what can be done about it?
Personal opinion only, but there seem to be a lot of ex communists/socialists who seem to be attaching themselves to this flag as their other opinions have been run out of town, stamped on and kicked in the gutter where they belong, discuss!
You won't be saying that come the revolution, you retarded fuckwit!!!
But some people (Steve Dowman, you are a prime example) seem to miss the point. If people are being called names, being made fun of, etc, they will respond. You can't really expect anything else - this is a forum full of strong-minded blokes (on the whole).
For me, the problem is the fact that the name calling etc starts in the first place. And for me, it is generally always the same person (or couple of people) who shart it off, and make the threads overly aggressive and personal. You can't really blame the others for rising to it.
I think you'll find that most of GH's posts on topics like this are ridiculously antagonistic - even the ones where he doesn't type as though the 'o' key on his keyboard is stuck. What generally tends to happen is some wag starts a thread on some mildly controversial subjet du jour or other, some sensible people weigh in with arguments supporting their 'side' of the argument then, when people singularly fail to see the evidence that is planted before them (or, in this case, ignore reams of evidence and highlight inaccuracies in reporting), when they're challenged on it they naturally rail at the apparently implied suggestion that they're thick. The thread then degenerates into otherwise intelligent people chucking insults at each other.
GH probably suffers from the same thing that I do - the intelligent working-class man inferiroity complex - reinforced every time some prick from a privileged background looks down on you because of the way you talk. Unfortunately for him, it's double spiteful because of his dyslexia. At least when I'm keyboard warrioring it up, the fact that I am - to all intents and purposes - Council Estate Scum isn't readily apparent.
Of course, that doesn't in any way account for the lameness of personal attacks on him (or other contibutors) from people who should definitely know better.
Isnt it as simple as that?
Why try to tart it up with excuses and some kind of 'victim' role play?
What has knowing something about a subject, or having an opinion about it got to do with priviledge? Why do you have to bring priviledge into this? And why associate knowledge or understanding with priviledge and then further associate it with being a prick, as you say?
Do we have to post differently because you are crossing your fingers and saying you have an (imaginary) complex?
What is spiteful about responding to the abuse GH throws out?
Bewildering post Leroy. Right up there with the best of Gooner.