Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

the charlton centre back factor...you decide.

2

Comments

  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,568
    Dailly - for his calmness and concentration. Would like to get Forch too, but not at the expense of Christian.
  • Se12Addick
    Se12Addick Posts: 272
    Its got to be Fortune, i like Dailly but he cant have long left in him now and we need to be thinking about building a stable team to compete in this league over the course of a few seasons like Leeds had to. It would be a disaster if we failed to get promoted this year again, and then had to do a complete re-build all over again.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,034
    edited July 2010
    [cite]Posted By: Scoham[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: ValleyGary[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: mart77[/cite]I would add that I wouldn't mind seeing Fortune, Dailly and Doherty with Jackson and Solly/RB bombing up the wings.

    I would certainly look into this if i was PP. With very little winger & full back options 3-5-2 (or 5-3-2) might be the way to go.
    I'm sure we'll sign a winger or two. Parky has always played with a back four and I can't see that changing. It's a lot of work for the wide players, probably one of the main reasons not many sides play 3-5-2 or similar any more.

    Whilst i agree we may sign a couple of wide players, are they going to be better than what we have in centre midfield. What i mean is we have Jackson, Semedo, Racon, Mac, Stav. Thats some decent talent at this level. Playing three of those in midfield would strengthen the side imo. I know PP likes playing 4 at the back but i wouldnt mind him becoming more versatile to suit our better players. Even if he gives it 20-25 minutes in a friendly.
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    Don't make me choose!!! Would like to see both at the club, if possible.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Fortune looked very assured last night but Doherty reads the game very well too so they could work well together.

    Dailly - well we all know what he is capable of.

    Sodje - IMO the weakest of the lot defensively BUT the best offensively.

    If we had all 3 along with Llera we'd have a very solid bunch of centre backs as Basey and Semedo can fill in if required too

    If I could only have one i'd say Fortune if he proves fitness, then Dailly, then Sodje
  • mart77
    mart77 Posts: 5,658
    [cite]Posted By: Swisdom[/cite]

    Sodje - IMO the weakest of the lot defensively BUT the best offensively.

    I think Doherty could be better than Sodje when it comes to getting goals.
  • hudson-son-son
    hudson-son-son Posts: 2,648
    As amazing as Dailly was, Fortune - Doherty would probably be a better partnership than Doc - Dailly. Would have both ideally but I can't see it.
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,697
    Fortune for me (and Dailly if Llera goes). I think we can run with three centre-halves plus a utility man. What happened to Matt Fry ? Can cover centre half and full back and can't see him getting a look in at West Ham.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,968
    IMO we'd be foolish not to sign Dailly.

    His leadership on the field (even when Bailey was captain), organisational skills, and calm distribution was vital last season. Lack of pace if exposed when opponents are counter attacking is his weak point, but that should invariably be compensated by team mates.

    Don't underestimate what Dailly brings to the dressing room - last season he was very much looked up to and hugely influential, a factor definitely appreciated by the management team.


    Fortune is a very good 2nd ball CB, calm and composed most of the time, and brings pace and quick feet to the back 4.
    Apart from a handful of games as a very young player on loan at Mansfield, he's played only in the top 2 divisions, mostly in the Prem - he's now vastly experienced. A quality defender at this level, but not a leader in the way that Dailly has proven himself to be.


    If the budget is there, IMO it would be a great move to sign them both.
  • Fortune, just because its Fortune.

    He has come home with his tail between his legs. We should be opening our arms like a parent accepting her grown son back after his new girlfriend has kicked him out.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Stebo
    Stebo Posts: 790
    we need four centre backs really. would be happy with Doc, Fortune, Dailly and Lleara
  • adamtheaddick
    adamtheaddick Posts: 8,664
    Doc and fortune would if injury free be one of the best cb partnerships in league one, both have played premiere league football and would compliment each other, with dailly as back up if we have the funds.
  • StrikerFirmani
    StrikerFirmani Posts: 2,746
    Fortune for me.

    We should have 4 CB for the season really so why not both Dailly Fortune.
  • bibble
    bibble Posts: 1,052
    Fortune - He sent the Nigels down!!
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,968
    [cite]Posted By: Stebo[/cite]we need four centre backs really. would be happy with Doc, Fortune, Dailly and Lleara

    There's 4 x CB's, aged 30 and over! ....... but a huge amount of experience, let alone 2 internationals and 3 with substantial Prem experience! But Fortune appears to be the only one with quick feet.

    We also know that Dailly has a quick brain and the organisational skills. Llera has bravery, a silky1st touch and can hit a killer long pass occasionally - but lacks pace, and liable to mentally lose the plot once in a while!

    The Doc also will put his head in where it hurts and has a determined way of playing, leading by example.


    We can also sub-divide into the Doc and Llera being 1st ball CB's, while Fortune and Dailly are 2nd ball CB's.
    So we also need to ensure the right balanced pairing is made.

    You can never tell in the pre-season how injuries and suspensions can affect the team - so agree with Stebo, that we need 4 CB's. Fortune can also cover at RB ....... he's played there several times before.
  • PL54
    PL54 Posts: 10,757
    [cite]Posted By: StrikerFirmani[/cite]Fortune for me.

    We should have 4 CB for the season really so why not both Dailly Fortune.

    ...because they won't work for buttons
  • scruffle
    scruffle Posts: 2,285
    edited July 2010
    dam you fatal lasso error, did write a well thought out comment,

    to skim write, we wont offer fortune a deal, as parky stated we called him to come and train not to trial, what he expects and what we would offer would be a million miles apart, what maybe 20% of his original wage with us even when he wasnt considered a starting CB?!
  • StrikerFirmani
    StrikerFirmani Posts: 2,746
    [quote][cite]Posted By: PL54[/cite][quote][cite]Posted By: StrikerFirmani[/cite]Fortune for me.

    We should have 4 CB for the season really so why not both Dailly Fortune.[/quote]

    ...because they won't work for buttons[/quote]

    I realise that. You are stating the bloody obvious. However Parky has a budget for the whole squads wages so you could have 4 CB and make the allowance for it else where in the squad.
  • PL54
    PL54 Posts: 10,757
    if we need 4 CBs then it a little luxurious to have all 4 seasoned pros - at least one has to be an understudy
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    Dailly without a doubt. He is a better player than Fortune. I would consider signing Fortune to be a real gamble considering his injury record. We need to minimize our risks.

  • Sponsored links:



  • RedArmySE7
    RedArmySE7 Posts: 5,407
    Fortune. I've always thought he was a better defender alongside a big solid partner. I'm pretty sure that Doc will provide that and I'd think with those 2 at the back we'd have the best CB pairing in the league.
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,219
    Dailly for me. I know he's 387 years old but he's still probably one of the fittest players in the division, certainly at CAFC. He's not as quick as Forch but I'd fancy Dailly to be fit and available for more games than Forch.

    Needs to be one of them thoughn as they'll make better foils for Doherty's go head/fight anything in sight style. I love Smodje and think he was great for us last season, but he's too similar to Doherty imo to play alongside him regularly.
  • StrikerFirmani
    StrikerFirmani Posts: 2,746
    [cite]Posted By: PL54[/cite]if we need 4 CBs then it a little luxurious to have all 4 seasoned pros - at least one has to be an understudy

    I take your point but sorry don't agree. CB's are the spine of the team, a couple of suspensions or injuries and you can expose a weakness if the understudy is to raw. I suppose again it depends on the experience of the under study.

    Fortune can also play RB if necessary as cover.
  • hudson-son-son
    hudson-son-son Posts: 2,648
    Do people really think that one of Gary Doherty, Christian Dailly or Jonathan Fortune will be happy to be back-up at this level? Not a chance.

    Think some people are underating Fortune really, he's mobile, good in the air and can read the game, not amazing at one particular bit of his game but with all those together, he'd be one of the top few centre backs in the division, especially as people were so desperate for Mkandawire. Much more of a Championship centre back should we get there as well.

    Dailly was fantastic but Doherty can be the dominant in the air leader with the quicker Fortune covering up for him, has all the makings of one of the best centre back partnerships of the division.

    Doc, Fortune, Llera, Mambo with Basey and Semedo who can play there would do.
  • Arry Addick
    Arry Addick Posts: 1,171
    Fortune for me...shame as Dailly had a very good season...but he's 36 this year I believe...shouldn't be a reason, but it is!! lol
  • johnny73
    johnny73 Posts: 4,567
    Another factor should be whether these experienced pros pass on knowledge to the kids coming through. As the kids are our only long term hope. I would take Dailly as the elder statesman over Fortune.
  • dabos
    dabos Posts: 2,715
    [cite]Posted By: StrikerFirmani[/cite]
    [cite]Posted By: PL54[/cite]if we need 4 CBs then it a little luxurious to have all 4 seasoned pros - at least one has to be an understudy

    I take your point but sorry don't agree. CB's are the spine of the team, a couple of suspensions or injuries and you can expose a weakness if the understudy is to raw. I suppose again it depends on the experience of the under study.

    Fortune can also play RB if necessary as cover.

    But would you rather sign a 4th centre back OR an extra striker/winger, given that we have Semedo, Basey and Youga who can act as 4th choice centre back in an emergency. We wouldn't need 2 centre backs on the bench. I think this is what it boils down to, as Scoham pointed out on the previous page. How many times did we need that 4th choice centre back last year? I think Semedo played there at Brentford away and Swindon at home after Llera was sent off, and we would've needed to use one before Sam Sodje signed. But I don't recall many more times than that.
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    Got to be Dailly . What frame of mine would Fortune be in - would worry
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,682
    edited July 2010
    Very, very tough one this.

    I have always liked Jon Fortune and regularly defended him on here when others have slagged him off. However how well has he recovered from that ruptured achilles tendon? He hasn't had a lot of football since so can he do a whole season?

    Dailly was immense last season on the field and, from what one reads and hears, off it too. However, although a consumate professional, he is 37 so can we expect a full season from him? As far as I am concerned he surpassed expectations last season.

    I think I lean to Dailly but ask me in an hour or so and I'll probably say Fortune!

    EDIT: I've assumed we can only take one. If possible I'd sign both.

    I liked Sam Sodje but with the Doc and Llera, plus the other two, he is the one to miss out for me.
  • JA_66
    JA_66 Posts: 21
    Clearly both may have fitness issues, so we should be looking to make packages dependent upon appearances. If only McLeod was on a similar deal.

    The other possibility is that Fortune and Doherty might be usable as a backup striker, if we want a targetman.