But it's not indiscriminate. If you don't go in there you wont get fined.
Anyway, nice debating with you without the need for petty insults. I suspect we may just have to agree to disagree on this. (Although you are right about the financial aspect, but I think this is a convenient - and not insignificant - consequence, rather than the sole reason for the existence of cameras. I mean, have you tried to get around London lately? Something needs to be done.)
Classic Charlton Life stuff this. Fairly lighthearted thread starts up and by about post seven we've got a row about the nature of the law and use of public money.
I want to know if this happens on everyone else's forum.
Agreed. Interesting debate. I'm just a guy who got to the age of 49/50 as a model citizen, then found himself on the wrong side of the law just for going a few (and I do mean a few) miles over the limit. Fecking cameras 3 points 60 quid fine and increased insurance costs.
Or are you suggesting that it's only the people "unlucky" enough to be there when a bus comes along that gets the ticket?
Yep - but I wouldn't say it's a matter of luck.
There are far worse things going on than tranferring a child from one car to another, especially when due care is being taken not to block other vehicules.
Comments
Classic Charlton Life stuff this. Fairly lighthearted thread starts up and by about post seven we've got a row about the nature of the law and use of public money.
I want to know if this happens on everyone else's forum.
There are far worse things going on than tranferring a child from one car to another, especially when due care is being taken not to block other vehicules.
Surely the reason both cars pulled over was because the 4 year old was about to be sick and you were needed to assist.
Mitigating circumstances, a medical emergency involving an infant.