Can anyone explain in very simple terms for a very simple man what the hell is going on here please? I must have known it at the time but I had clearly forgoten but apparently ownership of the pitch and the stands does not lie with the club hence they are trying to buy the shares back from the supporters 'club' thingy in order to potentially move to another location but the club are not saying where to or when. Is that right?
Is Ken Bates still involved somehow then? I would imagine if he is he'll be more than helpful. Not.
Comments
To prevent the ground being developed the pitch was divided up in to 100s of pieces (not literally) and sold to fans.
The idea was that no one person owned the land so it would be almost impossible to buy them all and then build.
Now Chelsea want to move to Battersea but to fund that need to sell Stamford Bridge, presumably for more expensive houses and hotels.
There argument is "your fans, you didn't buy to make a profit" which may well be true but is a bit rich coming from a Club that is quite happy to spend fortunes on players and charge the earth for tickets
"Walks off gingerly to collect coat"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/oct/04/chelsea-fans-freehold-stamford-bridge?newsfeed=true
Chelsea fans are going mad at the proposals to knock down Stamford bridge and relocate to a bigger stadium, one fan was quoted as saying......
"You can't just bulldoze seven years of history"
Chelsea fans are going mad at the proposals to knock down Stamford bridge and relocate to a bigger stadium, one fan was quoted as saying......
"You can't just bulldoze seven years of history"
The grass is always greener...