Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton 1-1 Tranmere

13»

Comments

  • Brunello
    Brunello Posts: 1,950

    Hamer 6

    Solly 5  Needs to improve his distribution

    Morrison 8 (MOM) Outstanding

    Taylor 6

    Wiggins 5.5

    Green 5

    Hollands 7

    Stephens 6

    Jackson 6

    Kermogant 4.5 If games were won on backheaders to nobody we would have walked it

    Wright Phillips 6.5

     

     

  • HarryAMuse
    HarryAMuse Posts: 1,178
    Hamer - 7

    Solly - 7

    Morrison - 7.5

    Taylor - 7.5

    Wiggins - 7

    Green - 6.5

    Holland - 7

    Stephens- 7.5

    Jackson - 7.5

    Kermorgant - 7

    Wright Phillips - 7



    Wagstaff n/a - 7.5
  • DickVanDykesDiscoDog
    DickVanDykesDiscoDog Posts: 1,021
    edited October 2011
    Hamer 6
    Solly 6 Morrison 6 Taylor 6 Wiggins 7
    Green 6 Holland 6 Stephens 5 Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 6 Wright Phillips 6
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,674
    Hamer 5.5 Still makes me nervous, I'm afraid.
    Solly 6 Not his best performance, but kept at it
    Morrison 7 A rock - glad for the orange boots so I could tell him apart from Taylor!
    Taylor 6.5 Assured
    Wiggins 6 Looked v good early on, caught out a bit later, but think he will become a great asset
    Green 5 Tried hard, but little impact.  Throw-ins generally poor - would rather he was receiving them than taking them
    Hollands 6 Quieter game than usual - improved second half
    Stephens 6 As above
    Jackson 7 Quiet game, but extra point for composure re pen and therefore MOM
    Kermorgant 5.5 Not linking up well with BWP - don't think he won all his headers, and those he did were not well-directed.  More to come, hopefully.
    Wright Phillips 6 Very little service. 
  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,131
    Hamer - 6

    Solly - 6.5

    Morrison - 7.5

    Taylor - 7

    Wiggins - 7

    Green - 5

    Hollands - 6.5

    Stephens - 6.5

    Jackson - 7

    Kermorgant - 6.5

    Wright Phillips - 6.5
  • dabos
    dabos Posts: 2,717
    edited October 2011
    Hamer - 6

    Solly - 5.5

    Morrison - 6.5

    Taylor - 6.5

    Wiggins - 6.5

    Green - 4

    Hollands - 6

    Stephens - 6

    Jackson - 6

    Kermorgant - 5

    Wright Phillips - 5

  • Hamer 5
    Solly 6
    Morrison 7 - I'm becoming a big fan of him.
    Taylor 6.5
    Wiggins 6
    Green 5.5
    Holland 6
    Stephens 6.5
    Jackson 6
    Kermorgant 5.5
    Wright Phillips 6

  • kimbo
    kimbo Posts: 3,006

    Hamer 6

    Solly 7

    Morrison 6.5

    Taylor 6.5

    Wiggins 7

    Green 5

    Holland 6.5

    Stephens 5

    Jackson 7

    Kermorgant 5.5

    Wright Phillips 55
  • Paddy7
    Paddy7 Posts: 1,663
    Hamer 7 vg distribution and no real chance with goal
    Solly 7 steady as usual
    Morrison 7 as ususal, didn't wither under early pressure
    Taylor 6.5 as above but I didn't notice him as much!
    Wiggins 7 a couople of errors but our biggest threat in the first half
    Green 5 what a shame. Didn't really happen for him after such a long wait
    Hollands 6 quieter than usual
    Stephens 6 came into it second half after a disappointing first
    Jackson 6 combined well with Wiggins without scaring them - until the pen under pressure
    Kermorgant 6 not the impact we'd hoped for but did set up BWP and won plenty in the air
    Wright Phillips 6 quiet this time but still moments of genuine quality
  • DRF
    DRF Posts: 2,455
    Hamer 6 Dropped too many balls didn't dispplay confidence in front of goal
    Solly 7 better when he was partnered with Waggy as he got forward more.
    Morrison 7
    Taylor 6.5
    Wiggins
    Green 5 No understanding with Solly, didn't cover him or work together, but it must be hard to break into such a well formed partnership
    Holland 6 Not as great as normal
    Stephens 6.5
    Jackson 6 Out of position too often looking for goal rather than covering the wing
    Kermorgant 6.5 No complaints
    Wright Phillips 6.5 Unlucky not to score but can't really hold that against him too much.

    Wagstaff If I could I would give him 7 as I believe he was better than Green.

  • Sponsored links:



  • That's the lot, STATBANK will be up soon - I hope