Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: Leyton Orient 1-0 Charlton

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,649
edited January 2012 in General Charlton
Many thanks to the 46 Lifers who gave marks.
There have been a number of remarks about which players are eligible for marks and that Hamer's average won't decrease as he wasn't marked. - The system we use is that a player has to take part in the match for at least 30 minutes, including additional time. With regard to a player's average mark - one match won't make much difference. I do not want to change the system as part of the stats are comparisons with previous matches/seasons and if we change our criteria then the comparisons are no longer valid. However the Statbank is owned by all Lifers who contribute to it and if there is a groundswell of opinion that changes need to be made then I suggest we look at it at the season's end.

The Orient stats are a bit shorter than usual as with another game today I have not included the cumulative stats.

Comments

  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    Good stuff again LL.....we still look good for prmotion based on last two seasons.
  • Addickted4life
    Addickted4life Posts: 7,467
    edited January 2012
    Great stuff LL.

    Pritchard was our third best player but he only played for 30 mins. Shows how much we were lacking in the middle and what an impact he made.  
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,778
    A difficult game to analyse due to the circumstances.

Categories

“Marketplace”