Now see if the SPL start a SPL 2 to get around this.
What a mess.
Yep, the SFA/SPL won't give up the income they derive from Rangers without a fight. It's a ridiculous situation, Rangers fans, Scottish football fans and roughly 40 out of 42 clubs have all said Rangers should start again in Division 3 - if a few men in suits at the SFA and SPL can override that overwhelming statement of desire then it's an absolute disgrace.
Now see if the SPL start a SPL 2 to get around this.
What a mess.
Yep, the SFA/SPL won't give up the income they derive from Rangers without a fight. It's a ridiculous situation, Rangers fans, Scottish football fans and roughly 40 out of 42 clubs have all said Rangers should start again in Division 3 - if a few men in suits at the SFA and SPL can override that overwhelming statement of desire then it's an absolute disgrace.
I wonder what the odds are for Rangers to go a whole season unbeaten in Scottish Division Three?
You wouldn't get much value, the fourth tier of Scottish football is nowhere near the standard of League 2 in England, almost all of the clubs are semi pro. Out of 36 games I'd be surprised if Rangers won less than say 30/31, certainly can't imagine them losing. Just having the fitness levels of a professional should be more than enough, and that's before you consider how much more talented the players will still be able to attract are.
Clyde didn't even want them in Div 3! Personally I am glad they are in div 3, if they put them into an SPL 2 then there is no point in having relegation and promotion, changing the entirety of a countries league structure simply to accommodate a single club should only be reserved for farcical and corrupt places, like Argentina for example
How much money will the Div 2 & 3 clubs actually make out of this? Can't see that their ground capacities can be that big and will they not get anything from the gate receipts at Ibrox anyway?
How much money will the Div 2 & 3 clubs actually make out of this? Can't see that their ground capacities can be that big and will they not get anything from the gate receipts at Ibrox anyway?
How much money will the Div 2 & 3 clubs actually make out of this? Can't see that their ground capacities can be that big and will they not get anything from the gate receipts at Ibrox anyway?
I wonder what the odds are for Rangers to go a whole season unbeaten in Scottish Division Three?
You wouldn't get much value, the fourth tier of Scottish football is nowhere near the standard of League 2 in England, almost all of the clubs are semi pro. Out of 36 games I'd be surprised if Rangers won less than say 30/31, certainly can't imagine them losing. Just having the fitness levels of a professional should be more than enough, and that's before you consider how much more talented the players will still be able to attract are.
I guess that depends on the quality of the Rangers squad.
I would assume that even with the many players leaving there would still be enough quality to win the league easily but who and how many players do they have now? Is it clear if they can buy players or what sort of budget they will have?
How much money will the Div 2 & 3 clubs actually make out of this? Can't see that their ground capacities can be that big and will they not get anything from the gate receipts at Ibrox anyway?
Queen's Park have a large capacity.
Do they actually play at Hampden? I thought they used a separate pitch.
I wonder what the odds are for Rangers to go a whole season unbeaten in Scottish Division Three?
You wouldn't get much value, the fourth tier of Scottish football is nowhere near the standard of League 2 in England, almost all of the clubs are semi pro. Out of 36 games I'd be surprised if Rangers won less than say 30/31, certainly can't imagine them losing. Just having the fitness levels of a professional should be more than enough, and that's before you consider how much more talented the players will still be able to attract are.
I guess that depends on the quality of the Rangers squad.
I would assume that even with the many players leaving there would still be enough quality to win the league easily but who and how many players do they have now? Is it clear if they can buy players or what sort of budget they will have?
They have a few guys left over from last season, the main ones being Neil Alexander (probably the 3rd best 'keeper in Scotland) Dorin Goian (Romania's first choice centre back) and Lee McCulloch (who's offered to play for free) in addition to some promising youngsters. Financially they should actually be better off as they'll still have huge gate receipts from a supporter base that will continue to show up. I'd imagine they'll have the second highest attendances in Scotland with a relatively tiny wage bill and no debt. Plus there may be income from the sale of players depending on how that mess plays out.
For me the important thing is that the excess income is safeguarded to be re-invested when the club return to the SPL so they can be competitive again but I'm not so confident about that.
A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that it is the Scottish National stadium, built for the national team, with Queens Park just managing to blag their way in there.
But it is owned by Queen's Park and it is primarily Queen's Park stadium before anything else, with Scotland national team just using it.
How much money will the Div 2 & 3 clubs actually make out of this? Can't see that their ground capacities can be that big and will they not get anything from the gate receipts at Ibrox anyway?
Queen's Park have a large capacity.
Do they actually play at Hampden? I thought they used a separate pitch.
They played at the lesser Hampden when the ground was being developed and have moved back to their rightful home when it was finished.
Re Queen's Park my understanding is that they have the right to play at both Hampden and little Hampden (next door). They play league fixtures at little Hampden, but big cup fixtures at Hampden. A league tie against Rangers will be at Hampden itself.
Re Queen's Park my understanding is that they have the right to play at both Hampden and little Hampden (next door). They play league fixtures at little Hampden, but big cup fixtures at Hampden. A league tie against Rangers will be at Hampden itself.
Not always, they do play league games in the national stadium (the other stadiums called Lesser Hampden btw) and they need lots and lots of ball boys. I've never been to a game but apparently it's a surreal experience.
Comments
If Rangers do start in D3 apaarently they'll take Stranraer's place and their fixtures will be http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/teams/stranraer/fixtures - incredible !
Queens Park 53,000
Annan 2,000
I would assume that even with the many players leaving there would still be enough quality to win the league easily but who and how many players do they have now? Is it clear if they can buy players or what sort of budget they will have?
For me the important thing is that the excess income is safeguarded to be re-invested when the club return to the SPL so they can be competitive again but I'm not so confident about that.
A lot of people make the mistake of thinking that it is the Scottish National stadium, built for the national team, with Queens Park just managing to blag their way in there.
But it is owned by Queen's Park and it is primarily Queen's Park stadium before anything else, with Scotland national team just using it.
Doncaster should resign immediately, followed by Regan. Even if they don't they will both lose their jobs.
Average attendance in div 3 last season: 475!
Re Queen's Park my understanding is that they have the right to play at both Hampden and little Hampden (next door). They play league fixtures at little Hampden, but big cup fixtures at Hampden. A league tie against Rangers will be at Hampden itself.