Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Jimmy Seed

AshC
AshC Posts: 156
edited April 2012 in General Charlton
Doing a bit of research for a project I am working on and was wondering if anyone had anything on Jimmy Seed's time at Mid-Rhondda United, post-Sunderland and pre-Spurs? Do his books cover much of this period? Any help much appreciated.
«13

Comments

  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,661
    Chapters 10 and 11 (more so) of The Jimmy Seed Story.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,027
    Here's an extract from his book Soccer From The Inside:

    image
  • AshC
    AshC Posts: 156
    Thanks alot both :-)
  • clive
    clive Posts: 19,470
    A short piece about Seed featuring former lifer @JamesSeed on tonights BBC London News,from about 16.30min.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqlwgk/london-news-evening-news-05112018
  • JoshrewCAFC
    JoshrewCAFC Posts: 916
    clive said:

    A short piece about Seed featuring former lifer @JamesSeed on tonights BBC London News,from about 16.30min.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqlwgk/london-news-evening-news-05112018

    When and why was James banned?
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,860
    He self removed himself after comments on takeover thread.
  • gilbertfilbert
    gilbertfilbert Posts: 2,282
    JoshrewCAFC said:

    clive said:

    A short piece about Seed featuring former lifer @JamesSeed on tonights BBC London News,from about 16.30min.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqlwgk/london-news-evening-news-05112018

    When and why was James banned?
    He wasn’t. He just got fed up with some of the reaction to his comments on here.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,481
    gilbertfilbert said:

    JoshrewCAFC said:

    clive said:

    A short piece about Seed featuring former lifer @JamesSeed on tonights BBC London News,from about 16.30min.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b0bqlwgk/london-news-evening-news-05112018

    When and why was James banned?
    He wasn’t. He just got fed up with some of the reaction to his comments on here.
    Correct.
  • i_b_b_o_r_g
    i_b_b_o_r_g Posts: 18,948
    That's not correct
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    He wasn't, he left as CL was consuming too much of his life and family members were complaining.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    Fair enough.
  • ForeverAddickted
    ForeverAddickted Posts: 94,324
    edited November 2018
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/the_last_pass

    Article worth reading as mainly focuses around Jimmy Seed
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,481
    i_b_b_o_r_g said:

    That's not correct

    Errrrr.....what?
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,827
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,038
    AFKABartram said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
    Do you take into account allegations of previous allegiance to Millwall when decididing who to ban?
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,827
    Very seriously
  • CatAddick
    CatAddick Posts: 2,387
    AFKABartram said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
    Wow! CL's very own Star Chamber. Best watch myself
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,235
    Is that Acworth?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    Dazzler21, I believe.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    AFKABartram said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
    But none of that applied to Jimmy - which as I said earlier - Fair enough. He seemed like a could bloke to me and I am grateful to him for sharing what he knew, even if it didn't amount to anything. Not his fault.

    Was it a group decision to sink the thread about condemning the disgusting Grenfall Tower burning bonfire night party? As this happened in South London, surely, it is a good thing members of all political persuasions could condemn this vile act as they were doing.
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    AFKABartram said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
    But none of that applied to Jimmy - which as I said earlier - Fair enough. He seemed like a could bloke to me and I am grateful to him for sharing what he knew, even if it didn't amount to anything. Not his fault.

    Was it a group decision to sink the thread about condemning the disgusting Grenfall Tower burning bonfire night party? As this happened in South London, surely, it is a good thing members of all political persuasions could condemn this vile act as they were doing.
    If you can't see PMs sent to other members, how do you know what could apply to anyone?
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    AFKA said it didn't apply to him didn't he?
  • Stu_of_Kunming
    Stu_of_Kunming Posts: 17,118
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    AFKA said it didn't apply to him didn't he?

    He said he wasn't banned.

    He certainly did send various people abusive PMs, as well as being on the receiving end of some awful stuff.
  • bertpalmer
    bertpalmer Posts: 1,774
    AFKABartram said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Well if he was banned, he shouldn't have been.

    For the record, he wasn’t.

    But had he been there is a good chance you would not have been aware of the reason that he (or anyone else for that matter) had been excluded for.

    You only see what you see and don’t always know the full story behind why some people are excluded, or take a break from the forum. There may be posts that you have missed, deleted posts, inbox abuse, email or other abuse / reasons that determine we no longer what them contributing to our forum.

    Unless it is clearly visible in what people post then our forum moderators carry out user moderation in private, after consideration as a team, and not make a public drama of it. It’s not something that happens very often but you just have to put trust in our moderating team that they undertake this in a balanced way.

    Hope that helps
    So a team of moderators deleted my Survey,sack em all!!!
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,481
    edited November 2018
    Stu_of_Kunming said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    AFKA said it didn't apply to him didn't he?

    He said he wasn't banned.

    He certainly did send various people abusive PMs, as well as being on the receiving end of some awful stuff.
    Stu_of_Kunming said:

    MuttleyCAFC said:

    AFKA said it didn't apply to him didn't he?

    He said he wasn't banned.

    He certainly did send various people abusive PMs, as well as being on the receiving end of some awful stuff.
    Particularly from a well known poster on another very small and little used Charlton forum.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    Best leave it there. Can the Disgusting thread be unsunk though? It doesn't look right sinking it.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,038
    MuttleyCAFC said:

    Best leave it there. Can the Disgusting thread be unsunk though? It doesn't look right sinking it.

    I’m guessing there is a good reason for sinking it. The admins on this site generally get those calls right so, if something is sunk, I would imagine it’s for the best.,
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,730
    Ok, but I am suggesting respectfully that they might not have got that one right.
This discussion has been closed.

Categories

“Marketplace”