Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Hamer and Sullivan vs. The Steward

2

Comments

  • Stone
    Stone Posts: 3,026
    edited May 2012
    It will become like a wedding invite soon. Family members invited from all parts of the country and getting 'their' moment of glory.
    It's becoming like a free-for-all.

    Let the players get the reception THEY deserve and keep families for the after event.

    I bet half of them haven't even been to a game this season before yesterday.
  • Woodsywood
    Woodsywood Posts: 991
    Maybe KHA , but their families have had to put up with a lot , i didn't mind really , you can always find something to moan about ( not you personally).
    Must be a hard life being related to a footballer.
  • bingaddick
    bingaddick Posts: 8,184
    Well I thought it was great to let the families celebrate with the players. Its all part of the togetherness which has been restored at our club.

    For those who wanted a pitch invasion, how much better was that celebration than the scrum that occurred at Hillsborough?
  • Huskaris
    Huskaris Posts: 9,896
    If he lets the wrong person on, he is sacked.
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,053
    Odds are that the steward wanted to let the guys in question on, and was fully aware that it was the logical common sense decision BUT it was not his call to make. The rules are no-one from that stand are allowed on the pitch, the rules he did not make but has to follow if he wants to keep the job. Not a jobsworth, not a wanker just a bloke in a tricky spot.
  • kings hill addick
    kings hill addick Posts: 5,781
    edited May 2012
    Maybe KHA , but their families have had to put up with a lot , i didn't mind really , you can always find something to moan about ( not you personally).
    Of course, it's lovely for them, to be involved, but just, maybe, after the lap of honour? Also I think the argument that it's nice to reward those that have to put up with the life doesn't need to extend to friends, nieces and nephews.

    As I said I didn't want to moan, but I would have liked to have had a lap of honour with a full stadium with just the players. From the East stand all we saw of the players celebrations was their backs. If they'd done the dance for the cameras and then brought the cup to the stands together (rather like what happens at all major Cup Finals, and the playoff final in 1998) it would have been better, in my view.

    When the whole stadium is full of home fans you can't do the celebration in front of all of them at once, I completely understand that, which is why I thought they were going to do a lap of honor with the trophy - but they didn't do one in the end.

    As I said I don't want to be moaning, I really don't enjoy it, but I would have been lying if I'd said I thought the best idea was to bin the lap of honour in favour of watching the families have their photo taken with the cup - which they have, presumably, a whole year to organise.
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    Odds are that the steward wanted to let the guys in question on, and was fully aware that it was the logical common sense decision BUT it was not his call to make. The rules are no-one from that stand are allowed on the pitch, the rules he did not make but has to follow if he wants to keep the job. Not a jobsworth, not a wanker just a bloke in a tricky spot.
    Spot On
  • CAFCdamo
    CAFCdamo Posts: 1,692
    That's a good point about the positioning of the podium. Why was it there facing that way?
    Why not put the back to the away fans so that the Charlton fans could all see?
    Also it meant that the camera was behind it , and it looked terrible on the FLS.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,206
    Facing the directors box
  • CAFCdamo
    CAFCdamo Posts: 1,692
    Is that some type of rule set by the football league that has to be upheld ?

  • Sponsored links:



  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,206
    I would imagine its because our sponsors wanted it that way
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,291
    I like the families on the pitch. You never know, some of those kids might just grow up to be Charlton fans, but if you freeze them out when their dad's are celebrating a glorious season like that, they might just think what a miserable club we are.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,291
    That's a good point about the positioning of the podium. Why was it there facing that way?
    Why not put the back to the away fans so that the Charlton fans could all see?
    Also it meant that the camera was behind it , and it looked terrible on the FLS.
    Perhaps so that it's facing into the light and the quality of the tv and press pictures will be better. Except that the bloody BBC couldn't be arsed to move themselves, so on telly we saw it all from behind.
  • WhenIwasLittleBoy
    WhenIwasLittleBoy Posts: 5,430
    edited May 2012
    There are a few things here. Firstly we can thank Dennis Wise for all this kids,on the pitch after the game which i don't really have a problem. However it went to a different level yesterday where players were brings on members of their family and friends regardless of there ages. The steward was getting instructions from his superiors in his ear piece not to let other people on the pitch. It was difficult to see players on the pitch at the end let alone the trophy, in my opinion it would have made more sense for the players to parade the trophy and get there well earned applause, and then let there kids on after.
  • BigRedEvil
    BigRedEvil Posts: 11,125
    Dennis Wise?

    I agree it was all a bit chaotic with the amount of people on there.
  • BrentfordAddick
    BrentfordAddick Posts: 1,474
    He was the first to do it at Wembley and since then it has become fairly common. I thought it looked a bit tatty yesterday, really, lots of people with no obvious connection. No big deal but anyway.
  • Danny Addick
    Danny Addick Posts: 3,948
    Facing the directors box
    Surely it was there so the screen with CHAMPIONS was behind??
  • Kap10
    Kap10 Posts: 15,636
    We won the league, we got 100 plus points, we got promoted after that I really don't care, let the players have their moment of glory for some they may never have those scenes again. If they want to bring on their boyfriends, girlfriends, mothers to their children, sisters, aunts, 4 th cousins six times removed ... I don't care ... We paid to watch a football match after that all is a bonus.
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 575
    Lucky the jobs worth was not stewarding at Tottenham when Fabrice Muamba needed treatment from Dr Andrew Deaner the cardiologist who was a home supporter in the crowd.
    Common sense could have prevailed.

  • Sponsored links:



  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    Lucky the jobs worth was not stewarding at Tottenham when Fabrice Muamba needed treatment from Dr Andrew Deaner the cardiologist who was a home supporter in the crowd.
    Common sense could have prevailed.
    How on Earth Can you compare this incident to the Fabrice Muamba incident. ?
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 575
    Would he have let the Doctor on the pitch?
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 575
    edited May 2012
    It's not about the severity of the incident with Muamba but the arrogance of the steward.
  • AdTheAddicK
    AdTheAddicK Posts: 3,435
    Why is everyone making out this steward to be the next Fred West.... ?
    He is doing and has done HIS JOB FFS !
  • I'm, personally, not sure of the logistics of the players families (and not just partners and children - there was many teenagers running around the pitch) coming on and taking it in turns having their photo taken with the cup while half of the fans left before the cup was paraded around the ground.

    Surely they could have had their photo's taken aft the fans had left?

    I know I'll get slated for this, but in the end the cup wasn't brout 'round by the team it was carried 'round by three players after the rest had gone. It also meant that the ground was mostly empty by the time Powell made his speech, which I missed as I thought it was all over.

    I guess it doesn't really matter, but I would have thought a lap of honour by the players and the cup before the families came on the pitch would have been better.

    Moan over.
    Good post But (and I know I'll get slated for this) , I feel some sympathy for the 'jobsworths'. My youngest son currently works as a steward at various clubs in diffferent professional sports (football/cricket/horse racing) - and basically they do as they're told. So when Charlton stewards get it wrong, I'd look to whoever briefed and instructed them rather than decent individuals who aren't wearing a high-vis jacket because they like the power and authority , but simply because they can't get a better job and in order to survive are forced to take shit gigs like stewarding which pay no more than nat. minimum wage.

  • incorruptible addick
    incorruptible addick Posts: 2,125
    edited May 2012

    .
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 575
    Why didn't you and your mate in your profile picture come to the rescue of Hamer and Sullivan?
  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,797
    Personally, I agree with what KHA says. Don't mind them bringing their kids on but thought it got a bit silly and would have loved to see just the team do a lap of honour with the pot before bringing others onto the pitch. All got a bit shambolic I thought. Luckily I hung around to hear CP's speech (apologies to Blackheathaddict waiting to drive home).



    "You're getting sacked in the morning".........................
  • CAFCdamo
    CAFCdamo Posts: 1,692
    edited May 2012
    So where were all the stewards when it was kicking off in J-block ?
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 575
    Shepherding the Wags in the NWQ.