Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Premier League 20 Year Table

bingaddickbingaddick
edited May 2012 in General Charlton
Just see thiswww1.skysports.com/football/news/11096/7773572/The-20-year-table

We are 21st out of 45

Comments

  • Options
    Exiled_AddickExiled_Addick
    Yeah, but we have 468 games in hand, on our current form we'll be top by Christmas.
  • Options
    bingaddickbingaddick
    Yeah, but we have 468 games in hand, on our current form we'll be top by Christmas.
    Lol!

    Still well ahead of that stripy massive from Croydon. No sign at all of the Spanners....:-)
  • Options
    kafkakafka
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
  • Options
    CafcCrazyCafcCrazy
    surprised to see west sham are not anywhere to be seen... belong in the premiership ? Media know nothing.
  • Options
    bingaddickbingaddick
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    West London
  • Options
    MikeMike
    surprised to see west sham are not anywhere to be seen... belong in the premiership ? Media know nothing.
    they are 11th?
  • Options
    golfaddickgolfaddick
    interesting to see that half the football league have been in the top division over the last 20 yrs and in that time only 7 clubs have been there all the time..............not such an "exclusive" league after all !!!
  • Options
    killerandflashkillerandflash
    45 is an amazing number, and only 5 of those teams were one season wonders!

    I'm surprised we're above Leicester and Birmingham, and it's interesting that the Hammers are 10th in terms of appearances in the PL, suggesting that their boasts about belonging in the PL aren't entirely false...
  • Options
    Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    I don't get the West Ham comment at all.

    Bolton have played more games than Leeds!
  • Options
    MiserableoldgitMiserableoldgit
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    I think that That Wimbledon is in Milton Keynes now ?
    Or is it AFCWimbledon ?
    I get confused very easily......

  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    tangoflashtangoflash
    This league table was commisioned by Liverpool, as it's the only one that puts them in the top 4............................
  • Options
    JohnBoyUKJohnBoyUK
    Blimey, didnt really expect to see Tottenham as high as that. Would be interesting to see it sorted on a points per game basis.
  • Options
    colthe3rdcolthe3rd
    @JohnBoyUK
    http://www.statbunker.com/football/ktg/index.php?PL=ktgalltime&Code=EPL&statType=EPL_ALL
  • Options
    CAFCdamoCAFCdamo
    @JohnBoyUK
    http://www.statbunker.com/football/ktg/index.php?PL=ktgalltime&Code=EPL&statType=EPL_ALL
    Interestingly on that table it says "MK Dons" instead of "Wimbledon".
  • Options
    Chrispy51Chrispy51
    45 is an amazing number, and only 5 of those teams were one season wonders!

    I'm surprised we're above Leicester and Birmingham, and it's interesting that the Hammers are 10th in terms of appearances in the PL, suggesting that their boasts about belonging in the PL aren't entirely false...

    4 - Swansea are one of the 5 and they will be there next year
  • Options
    RizzoRizzo
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
  • Options
    cafcfan1990cafcfan1990
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
    22nd according to the above link
  • Options
    RizzoRizzo
    I worked out points per game and...we're still 21st.
    22nd according to the above link
    Oops, my bad. 22 it is.

  • Options
    MrOneLungMrOneLung
    Blimey, didnt really expect to see Tottenham as high as that. Would be interesting to see it sorted on a points per game basis.
    As one of the only ever presents I thought you would definitely be in the top 7.

  • Options
    DA9DA9
    edited May 2012
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    DA9DA9
    How did Leicester manage to play 4 more prem games than us, when did they lose 2 teams from the original 1992 teams/table?
  • Options
    C_A_F_CC_A_F_C
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.
    In my book West Ham is Essex. Arsenal, Chelsea, Fulham & Tottenham are Middlesex

    Number 1 in London....
  • Options
    UboatUboat
    Number 1 in Kent - and that is a fact.
  • Options
    Friend Or DefoeFriend Or Defoe
    How did Leicester manage to play 4 more prem games than us, when did they lose 2 teams from the original 1992 teams/table?
    The league was reduced from 22 teams in 20 teams in '95, some team called crystal palace were the extra team to go down with only two teams going up from Div 1.

  • Options
    MiserableoldgitMiserableoldgit
    beaten by Wimbledon; not No 1 in South London.
    Technically speaking they were in Merton, which is Surrey in my book, so still No1 in South London.
    I think that That Wimbledon is in Milton Keynes now ?
    Or is it AFCWimbledon ?
    I get confused very easily......
  • Options
    AddicktedAddickted
    Palace's goal difference is better than ours.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!