Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Olympics - 'greenest ever'

London 2012 has been the greenest Olympics ever, the commission set up to monitor the environmental impact of the Games has announced.

The independent Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 said recycling and regeneration had been a success.

But it said much more could be done to minimise the impact of future Olympic Games on people and the planet.

Commission chairman Shaun McCarthy said London had set high standards for future Olympic host cities to follow.
Transport success

Previous Olympics have been criticised for the environmental damage they caused through waste, construction and transport.

Sustainability was at the heart of London's bid for the Olympics and the commission said organisers had largely succeeded in achieving it.

For example, the venues were told to be made of at least a quarter recycled materials - that included using disused gas pipes in the Olympic Stadium.

The Olympic Park was praised for regenerating a derelict area and benefiting wildlife, and the commission said it was amazed by the success of public transport.

'Cheerful volunteers'

Mr McCarthy said the use of temporary venues for the Games was "unprecedented".

And he hailed Stratford in east London, the site of the Olympic Park, as one of the best connected places in Europe after long-term investment in public transport infrastructure.

He said London 2012 was the world's first public transport Olympics "despite all the predictions of doom and gridlock".
«1

Comments

  • Thanks Seb :-)
  • I dont suppose the Evening Standard would like to reprint some of their articles from a few years back and eat a large slice of humble pie.
  • Same for all of them - always going for sensationalist (usually bad) news stories.
  • Same for all of them - always going for sensationalist (usually bad) news stories.

    You're correct of course but I picked on the Substandard as they are a London paper.
  • Completely agree CK.
    On another thread, I quoted the sub standard contradicting themselves completely in the same edition.
    Toilet paper.
  • 1.2 million people have watched athletics from the stadium - the best supported athletics meeting ever - wow
  • I am quite certain that the 720 BC games in Olympia had an almost zero carbon footprint.
  • I am quite certain that the 720 BC games in Olympia had an almost zero carbon footprint.

    ...sadly ruined by the farting lions, zebras and bears - apparently.
    Plus it was only open to Greeks, and only a 5 day shindig, so not a fair comparison I guess

  • You'll never beat British support, but expect Brazil will be greener. Never been anywhere that recycles nearly as vigorously.
  • So much wastage though

    We are in the recycling phase but the amount of money spent just to be thrown away and recycled seems insane to me and it may be green but it doesn't sit well with me to have such wastage
  • Sponsored links:


  • Hello boys.

    Greenest ever games ever, eh? Hmmmm. Your starter for ten: Manor House allotments - or what WAS Manor House allotments - given to the people of the area, in perpetuity, by a benefactor. Razed to the ground. Gone. www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/145

    And how about the houseboat community on the river Lea? Off you go, soap dodgers. And the woodland fringe of Leyton Marshes? Bulldozed. ASBOs to those who tried to protect the land.
    And a complete fail by Boris to secure the promised jobs for locals. Especially the young.

    Oh, and apparently the sponsors made a heap of dosh. That's Coca Cola, MuckDonald's, British Airways, etc.

    So, yeah. Deeply verdant all the way.

    ps. Wiggo was jolly good though, wasn't he? (I like a slim chap in lycra)
  • Good job there are plenty of other allotments, houseboats and woodlands in the country then.

    Only one Olympic Park though.
  • The wild flowers at the Olympic park were fab
  • Houseboats?

    Damn you. That wins the argument hands down. We shouldn't have bothered bidding for the Olympics if it meant moving on a few houseboats.
  • Anna_kissed are you in the UK?
  • Made a shit part of London look amazing

    And a stretch of the lea useable not like it was before

    If we lost a few allotments and some house boats sailed off further up stream

    So what



  • Hit and run first poster.

    Probably a troll. Ignore.
  • Sponsers made a tonne of dosh from this? erm... isn't that what the entire idea of sponsorship is?
  • Hello boys.

    Greenest ever games ever, eh? Hmmmm. Your starter for ten: Manor House allotments - or what WAS Manor House allotments - given to the people of the area, in perpetuity, by a benefactor. Razed to the ground. Gone. www.gamesmonitor.org.uk/node/145

    And how about the houseboat community on the river Lea? Off you go, soap dodgers. And the woodland fringe of Leyton Marshes? Bulldozed. ASBOs to those who tried to protect the land.
    And a complete fail by Boris to secure the promised jobs for locals. Especially the young.

    Oh, and apparently the sponsors made a heap of dosh. That's Coca Cola, MuckDonald's, British Airways, etc.

    So, yeah. Deeply verdant all the way.

    ps. Wiggo was jolly good though, wasn't he? (I like a slim chap in lycra)

    The whole place was a crap hole, the surrounding area still is a crap hole.
    The country or at least the capital has been show cased.
    As for jobs 46k people worked building these games.
    It aint a crime for big business to make money.

  • edited August 2012
    Hello new poster.
    Welcome to Charlton.
    Yes it's true as the excellent WWF report on the success of the sustainability of the games notes here
    http://blogs.wwf.org.uk/blog/green-sustainable-living/olympics/my-olympic-park-experience-starting-with-the-positive/
    , the temporary relocation of the manor house allotments were the one bad call amongst the very very many good calls made in the development of the Olympic site.
    But, be honest, even the sternest critics have noted that the %ge of greenery over the redevelopment site is vastly increased, which you must be pleased about?
    100 acres of extra greenery, well thought out planting of trees and the creation of a bogland vital for biodiversity. The brilliant concept of species from 4 continents planted to represent the horticulture of Britain over 500 years by specialists from the University of Sheffield, will be fascinating to see develop as they intertwine with maturity. All grown on recycled green waste compost, by the way.


    And the removal of tens of thousands of tonnes of contaminated soil and Europe's largest fridge mountain must also please you?

    And the dredging, aerating and rubbish removal from the Lea must make your heart sing?

    As the guy from WWF notes, '' it’s hard not to be slightly awestruck.''

    Cheer up fella. It's the largest urban park created in the UK since 1850. Isnt that just lovely?

    Who is your favourite Charlton player, by the way?

  • Sponsored links:


  • Favourite player must be Durruti.

    Anna_kissed = anarchist or have I got that completely wrong!
  • Enjoy the moment -lets not do the over analysis lark.
    Huge success ---so enjoy it

    There will be enough time over the next 4 years to pull it all apart.---------starting with the huge bollox of 46,000 jobs for "locals"
  • edited August 2012
    Oh, and having read the Olympic regeneration site and a blog by a former holder of a plot, following the temporary relocation of the allotments to a perfectly good site in Waltham Forest, they are to be reinstated in the same original location soon after the Paralympics are over, which should hearten all the 70 allotment holders.

    But you knew this, you little rascal, didn't you, as it was the plan way back in 2007, as this BBC article shows.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7009063.stm

    Which makes your dramatic 'razed to the ground, gone' statement look awfully lame.
  • ..and the houseboats are supposed to move every 14 days anyway.
  • I am quite certain that the 720 BC games in Olympia had an almost zero carbon footprint.

    ...sadly ruined by the farting lions, zebras and bears - apparently.
    Plus it was only open to Greeks, and only a 5 day shindig, so not a fair comparison I guess

    You are wrong there, they killed off all the wild life to build the stadia. Also didn't the Romans enter later?
  • I am quite certain that the 720 BC games in Olympia had an almost zero carbon footprint.

    ...sadly ruined by the farting lions, zebras and bears - apparently.
    Plus it was only open to Greeks, and only a 5 day shindig, so not a fair comparison I guess

    You are wrong there, they killed off all the wild life to build the stadia. Also didn't the Romans enter later?
    The wildlife was imported for the evening banquet sessions. Absolutely no Romans allowed (apart from a splinter cell undercover from the PFJ) in 720 BC - didn't you learn nuffink at school? ;-)
  • Same for all of them - always going for sensationalist (usually bad) news stories.

    But then Ken Livingstone was London mayor and the Sub Standard reflexively opposed/hated everything he did including in this was the London Olympics. Curiously their opposition seemed to wane around the time that Boris Johnson became mayor.

  • Cant believe Europe's biggest fridge mountain was right on my doorstep, and I never got to see it! Where's the biggest one now? Must see it before it's too late
  • I wonder how many ants nests have been irrevocably lost in the thoughtless rush to provide the greatest show on earth.
  • Favourite player must be Durruti.

    Anna_kissed = anarchist or have I got that completely wrong!

    I knew anna before she changed her name.
    I preferred her as Mona Kissed
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!