Watching the Arsenal Liverpool match and neither team have a proper striker on the bench. In fact Liverpool only have 2 senior strikers in the entire squad, and teams like Chelsea and Spurs seem pretty short in that area too, so have teams watched Spain at Euro 2012 and decided you can play 4 attacking midfielders instead of proper strikers and wingers? Will this filter down the leagues anytime soon, or is it just a fad?
0
Comments
West Ham have loaned an out & out striker in Carrol, Sunderland have spent a fortune on Fletcher, Dzeko and Tevez at the champs are pretty much out & out strikers. Only the very best sides will get away with a 'no striker policy'.
For my part, the long ball for a nod on is part and parcel of the game. All the tippy tappy stuff is OK, but it's a little bit insipid.
In liverpools case it was Rodgers attempt of doing a AVB and clearing out players with no real plan of who or how to replace them
Clint dempsey was his main target then there is something wrong with the man
As Mickey Quinn said this morning AVB means another vacancy beckons well Liverpool are a team that is in disarray and that little quip by Quinn could be describing his own team
Very ordinary easy to defend against no real quality on display bar sterling
Suarez looks busy but no real product
Gerrard is very predictable and does not seem to have the drive at the moment that he does posess
Defensively weak
Rodgers won't be there long
Arsenal on the other hand do have striking options
They may not be a typical number 9 but seem to hold a real threat going forward from wide positions
And there has been a huge fire alarm at anfield
They have all left
I personally think its a fad, teams will be so hell bent on tippy tappy shit and it will be easy to defend ala chelsea vs barcelona last season, and teams who have the players that can mix it and change it up will come to the fore.
If I was him I'd go for all three and hope I got one
Trouble is they are exceptional with world class players.
At the lower end of the ability scale, as a theory it all sounds and can look wonderful when it works, but it does tend to throw out the last 50 years of football theory that you can lob the ball up, have a holding player and lay it off.
In the end you win, or lose as a team, but you have to have somebody to put the ball in the back of the net, and when they get injured some on else to step in.
I love passing free flowing football, but I like winning more