Well to those surprised by the low marks, first we played a team that was shockingly bad and I would expect most teams in this league to beat them with little trouble. Now why the low scores for cort and Morrison, then look at the stats for shots at goal and on target by Ipswich,for example most headed clearances went to Ipswich or straight up in the air. Wilson indefence struggled to cope with their two large front men, for example over by us he attempted to tackle there number 14 who skipped by like a ballet dancer and this is a big lump. Also he gives a sence of panic when being closed down.
As Msomorton says Ipswich were pretty poor but they still needed to be beaten. The main fault with us was we failed to close down shooting opportunities fast enough but their only goal came by a lucky deflection.
Hamer 7 Wilson 6.5 Not brilliant but has the work ethic. Morrison 7.5 Cort 6.5 Solly 7 Green 7 Was busy and involved. Not everything came off but he worried them. Jackson. 6.5 Stephens 7 Some moments of class but caught on the ball a few times Kerkar. 6.5. Likes to play the game at walking pace but gave us width on the left side. Fuller 9 Easily man of the match, powerful and purposeful. He surprised me with his long accurate passes. Wright Phillips. 6 Not one of his better games but he continued to work hard.
Well to those surprised by the low marks, first we played a team that was shockingly bad and I would expect most teams in this league to beat them with little trouble. Now why the low scores for cort and Morrison, then look at the stats for shots at goal and on target by Ipswich,for example most headed clearances went to Ipswich or straight up in the air. Wilson indefence struggled to cope with their two large front men, for example over by us he attempted to tackle there number 14 who skipped by like a ballet dancer and this is a big lump. Also he gives a sence of panic when being closed down.
so there was no positives whatsoever? i hate when people take exception to other peoples marks but imo you are well off with them to the point of being hilarious.
Well to those surprised by the low marks, first we played a team that was shockingly bad and I would expect most teams in this league to beat them with little trouble. Now why the low scores for cort and Morrison, then look at the stats for shots at goal and on target by Ipswich,for example most headed clearances went to Ipswich or straight up in the air. Wilson indefence struggled to cope with their two large front men, for example over by us he attempted to tackle there number 14 who skipped by like a ballet dancer and this is a big lump. Also he gives a sence of panic when being closed down.
so there was no positives whatsoever? i hate when people take exception to other peoples marks but imo you are well off with them to the point of being hilarious.
Well to those surprised by the low marks, first we played a team that was shockingly bad and I would expect most teams in this league to beat them with little trouble. Now why the low scores for cort and Morrison, then look at the stats for shots at goal and on target by Ipswich,for example most headed clearances went to Ipswich or straight up in the air. Wilson indefence struggled to cope with their two large front men, for example over by us he attempted to tackle there number 14 who skipped by like a ballet dancer and this is a big lump. Also he gives a sence of panic when being closed down.
so there was no positives whatsoever? i hate when people take exception to other peoples marks but imo you are well off with them to the point of being hilarious.
I have taken no exception to other peoples marks. I was asked why I had marked so low and that was my reply. The quality of the opposition must effect the level of mark of aplaer and team.
Stephens deserves greater credit. Take him out and we'd have been no better than Ipswich. Yes, he'll misplace a pass or two over 90 minutes, but he sees opportunities that no-one else does.
So if you have a blinder, score a hat trick against Ipswich away you get a 6..... Do the same against Blacburn at home and it's a 9?
In principal yes, the applicatio of course will vary. Of course if you give 9pts for every hat trick scored by a charlton first teamit would not matter if it was against a top proffesional team or an under 17 club side. But of course the quality of the opposition must play a role in marking.
MickFoley Member said September 23 Stephens deserves greater credit. Take him out and we'd have been no better than Ipswich. Yes, he'll misplace a pass or two over 90 minutes, but he sees opportunities that no-one else does.
Can't believe the low marks some gave him - Well done for your comment, at least you know your football. As quote from TeeC completely agree with you!
Comments
Now why the low scores for cort and Morrison, then look at the stats for shots at goal and on target by Ipswich,for example most headed clearances went to Ipswich or straight up in the air. Wilson indefence struggled to cope with their two large front men, for example over by us he attempted to tackle there number 14 who skipped by like a ballet dancer and this is a big lump. Also he gives a sence of panic when being closed down.
As Msomorton says Ipswich were pretty poor but they still needed to be beaten. The main fault with us was we failed to close down shooting opportunities fast enough but their only goal came by a lucky deflection.
Hamer 7
Wilson 6.5 Not brilliant but has the work ethic.
Morrison 7.5
Cort 6.5
Solly 7
Green 7 Was busy and involved. Not everything came off but he worried them.
Jackson. 6.5
Stephens 7 Some moments of class but caught on the ball a few times
Kerkar. 6.5. Likes to play the game at walking pace but gave us width on the left side.
Fuller 9 Easily man of the match, powerful and purposeful. He surprised me with his long accurate passes.
Wright Phillips. 6 Not one of his better games but he continued to work hard.
Wilson - 6
Cort 7.5
Morrison - 8.5 MOTM
Solly - 7
Green - 7.5
Stephens - 7
Jackson - 7
Kerkar - 7
Bwp - 7
Fuller - 8
so there was no positives whatsoever? i hate when people take exception to other peoples marks but imo you are well off with them to the point of being hilarious.
Hamer 7
Wilson 7
Morrison 8
Cort 7.5
Solly 7
Green 8.5
Jackson 7.5
Stephens 8
Kerkar 7.5
Fuller 8.5
Wright Phillips 7.5
Pritchard N/A
Dervite N/A
Haynes N/A
Wilson - 7
Morrison - 8
Cort - 7
Solly - 7
Green - 8
Jackson - 7.5
Stephens - 7
Kerkar - 6.5
Fuller - 9
Wright Phillips - 6.5
Pritchard N/A
Dervite N/A
Haynes N/A
Wilson 7
Morrison 7
Cort 7
Solly 7.5
Green 7
Jackson 7.5
Stephens 7.5
Kerkar 6.5
Fuller 8.5
Wright Phillips 6.5
September 23
Stephens deserves greater credit. Take him out and we'd have been no better than Ipswich. Yes, he'll misplace a pass or two over 90 minutes, but he sees opportunities that no-one else does.
Can't believe the low marks some gave him - Well done for your comment, at least you know your football.
As quote from TeeC completely agree with you!
Wilson 7
Morrison 7
Cort 7
Solly 7
Green 7.5
Jackson 7
Stephens 8.5
Kerkar 7.5
Fuller 8.5
Wright Phillips 7.5
Wilson - 7
Morrison - 7
Cort - 7.5
Solly - 7
Green - 8
Jackson - 8
Stephens - 7.5
Kerkar - 7.5
Fuller - 8
Wright Phillips - 7