Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Slater denies offering Elliott chairman's role (SkySports link page 2)

12357

Comments

  • Would be similar to niall quinn at sunderland.
  • Fully agree with NLA, if he's a friend of both CP and TJ, and the relationships prove to be both sustainable and healthy, then this could be a big positive. But I also share AFKA's reservations. Where's the money going to come from, what is he being paid to do and who is actually going to be running CAFC?
  • A chairmanship role doesn't have to just mean investment but we currently have lost a good CEO if he can lead and cover that that's a good starter for 10
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,120

    A chairmanship role doesn't have to just mean investment


    Well that's what we've had for the last two years isn't it, a chairman with no 'real' financial investment ?

    They've been trying for months apparently for someone to take the Chairman role. If it is a case of just being a figurehead, then Elliott may well be fine. Not sure i buy into the idea that he will be someone else's who is new to the table's front man.

    If he is being brought in to do the job as 'executive chairman', then i'll have a doubt that he may be getting out of his depth.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,979
    I've just emailed Paul to wish him all the best if it is true - hope its still an active account.

    Fingers crossed I get something positive back
  • The big question is....








    ...do we resurrect the old Takeover thread or begin a new one?
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,443
    edited November 2012
    A takeover thread? AAAAAARRRRRGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

  • Would be similar to niall quinn at sunderland.

    I was thinking exactly this and he did a great job during his time there as the front man of their owner (Ellis I think?). Lets hope Elliott can have the same impact.
  • Is that David Milliband?
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,789
    Nothing against Elliott being chairman - Stanley Gliksten's ghost would be better than Slater IMO - but I understand this is currently a sticking point: "Elliott is yet to complete financial terms with Charlton."



  • Sponsored links:



  • jamescafc
    jamescafc Posts: 1,835
    Can't imagine he would expect to be paid that much for the role would he?

  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    what AFKA said
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,930

    Nothing against Elliott being chairman - Stanley Gliksten's ghost would be better than Slater IMO - but I understand this is currently a sticking point: "Elliott is yet to complete financial terms with Charlton."


    maybe he won't attend an interview until we agree to pay his bus fare ;-)

  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,789
    jamescafc said:

    Can't imagine he would expect to be paid that much for the role would he?

    Yes.
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    £100K airman ?
  • Plaaayer
    Plaaayer Posts: 9,009
    No 150k riflemen
  • jamescafc said:

    Can't imagine he would expect to be paid that much for the role would he?

    Yes.
    I read it as how much was he prepared to put into the club before we'd let him become Chairman.

    ;-)

  • Bubble
    Bubble Posts: 1,543
    Does this mean Mr Slater spun a story to deflect the truth a couple of weeks back - I do not believe it!
  • SheffieldRed
    SheffieldRed Posts: 3,772
    edited November 2012
    .
  • Something is obviously cooking behind the scenes, Elliot is fronting for someone as he is not an executive by any stretch, he is there as a figurehead.

    As Large says, the question is really who is Elliot fronting for and why?

    No knowledge but I think he is fronting TJ.


  • Sponsored links:



  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,427
    I for one, DON'T expect this will happen.

    I think there is smoke - but no fire.

    I could be wrong, but we will see.
  • the geezer is a pure gent end of and wouldn't every take the piss out of us.
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,147

    Nothing against Elliott being chairman - Stanley Gliksten's ghost would be better than Slater IMO - but I understand this is currently a sticking point: "Elliott is yet to complete financial terms with Charlton."


    maybe he won't attend an interview until we agree to pay his bus fare ;-)

    Oh Large, Mate. That's sooo distrespectul to Nathan HaHaHa
  • Rob
    Rob Posts: 12,016
    Can only be good this from a CP point of view. Both black and friends apparently.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,108
    I didn't realise that they were both...



    ...black.
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,454
    WSS said:

    I didn't realise that they were both...
    ...black.

    What's your source for that?

    Agree with AFKA's pros and cons but will be delighted if PE is Chair.

    Don't see this as anything to do with new money as you take over and then appoint.





  • Rob
    Rob Posts: 12,016
    I think that's what they are anyway.
  • CrayAddick
    CrayAddick Posts: 3,915
    edited November 2012
    This has happened.

    A little bird has just told me.
  • Davo55
    Davo55 Posts: 7,857

    This has happened.

    A little bird has just old me.

    Hope so, as I think it's a positive. Waiting with interest to see if it will be a non-executive role (figure-head, TJ and CP mediator) or executive (wonder if he has the skills and how involved he will be in appointing the new senior team - see other thread).
  • I think TJ is slowly gaining more and more control and PE is a decent choice as front of house so that Tony can stay anonymous. I do however see this move as a positive one. I like Elliot and I think h will be very good for us.