Perhaps the Society of Black Lawyers would be willing to represent him (Clattenburg), free of charge, as an apology for their part in this sordid affair?
Clattenburg, who claimed the last few weeks had been "the most stressful of his life", commented:
"I am looking forward to putting this behind me and concentrating on refereeing in the Premier League and other competitions.
"I am extremely grateful for the invaluable support of my family, my Select Group colleagues, the management of Professional Game Match Officials Limited and our union Prospect. The messages of encouragement from those inside and outside of the game have helped me through the most stressful time of my professional life.
"To know you were innocent of something but that there was the opportunity for it to wreck your career was truly frightening.
"Racism has no place in football and this experience should not discourage those to speak out if they genuinely believe they are a victim of abuse. However, there are processes that should be adhered in order that any investigation can be carried out in a manner that is fair for all parties involved.
"I know first-hand the ramifications of allegations of this nature being placed into the public domain ahead of a formal process and investigation. I hope no referee has to go through this in the future."
lets also get back to the fact this deflected from a steward getting crushed and a seat ripped up and thrown at hernandez.
I rather think that Chelsea's action was partially to do just that. Do we know what action is being taken against Chelsea for this and the coin and missile throwing at the United players.
I think their actions are because they lost. We know from experience that even when you beat them at Stamford Bridge, it doesn't count (according to Mouhrino).
Chelsea are up there with Millwall as the 2 clubs I most dislike.
On the radio it was reported not that he had been cleared but that he wouldn't be charged. The subtle difference implies he might have had some sort of case to answer. The FA owe him a vote of confidence and an apology. Cue silence from the shabby FA.
On the radio it was reported not that he had been cleared but that he wouldn't be charged. The subtle difference implies he might have had some sort of case to answer. The FA owe him a vote of confidence and an apology. Cue silence from the shabby FA.
actually on the radio they said it was thrown out as there was "no case to answer to"
which I take as meaning that Chelsea were talking utter rubbish
I would like to see what "In good faith" means and that really comes down to what were the words and was it a misunderstanding through language and literal translation. Obviously, Chelsea should be punished for failing to follow procedure and bringing the game into disrepute and the player receive a long ban for the conduct and actions he took towards the referee.
Two bob club,cant stand them,not the first time theyve accused a ref of something like this,think it was Terry after they lost to Barcelona a few seasons ago. Again,there was no case to answer. Bad losers.
Have Chelsea commented on the matter since Mr. Clatternburg's clearance?
They released a statement that essentially claimed their stance was vindicated by the fa in the name of protectimg their players and they did not apologise one iota.
Comments
So what happens to Chelski now? Oh yes Phuck all!
Mikel and SBL should have their names dragged through the gutter.
Be interesting to see if they can/will pursue Ramires or Luiz because it seems that they are believing that it was a misunderstanding in good faith.
"I am looking forward to putting this behind me and concentrating on refereeing in the Premier League and other competitions.
"I am extremely grateful for the invaluable support of my family, my Select Group colleagues, the management of Professional Game Match Officials Limited and our union Prospect. The messages of encouragement from those inside and outside of the game have helped me through the most stressful time of my professional life.
"To know you were innocent of something but that there was the opportunity for it to wreck your career was truly frightening.
"Racism has no place in football and this experience should not discourage those to speak out if they genuinely believe they are a victim of abuse. However, there are processes that should be adhered in order that any investigation can be carried out in a manner that is fair for all parties involved.
"I know first-hand the ramifications of allegations of this nature being placed into the public domain ahead of a formal process and investigation. I hope no referee has to go through this in the future."
I rather think that Chelsea's action was partially to do just that. Do we know what action is being taken against Chelsea for this and the coin and missile throwing at the United players.
Chelsea are up there with Millwall as the 2 clubs I most dislike.
Mikel seems to be the pawn in this game as even CFC say he never heard something although he should be banned for his legs comments.
The other players have a case to answer.
And much as I dislike Clattenburg his statement is spot on.
Millwall are like a wasp in a jamjar by comparison.
which I take as meaning that Chelsea were talking utter rubbish
The FA shouldn't have entertained it in the first place.