It has long been accepted that in a two-leg football match, Home and Away, and when Away goals count double; that it is better two play your 2nd leg at home.
I question this. I think it is much better to play the second match AWAY.
For example, if you play Home first and DRAW, even 0-0, I don't think it is a bad result. You then go to your opponents ground and they are immediately under pressure. They have to score if it was nil/nil in the first leg whilst the away team only have to do the same. Even if it's a score draw in the first leg, the away team in the 2nd leg know that a goal will sort them out. I think that puts pressure on the home team in the 2nd leg.
Then if the game goes to extra time you have 30 mins more than your opponents did to score that so important AWAY goal.
Play your first leg at home, get a 0-0 and you're in the driving seat I reckon.
0
Comments
But I maintain that 0-0 at home in first leg is not the poor result it is often portrayed as.
Capital OneLeague Cup have semi finals over two legs, but no other rounds even have replays?