Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The old CAFC site...

CAFCTrev
CAFCTrev Posts: 5,983
in General Charlton
So much easier on the eyes...

cafc.digital-ink.co.uk/default.ink

Comments

  • charltonbob
    charltonbob Posts: 8,270
    Agree with that !
  • paulsturgess
    paulsturgess Posts: 3,827
    That just brings back unpleasant memories of the Johnstone's Paints Trophy.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,038
    Yep, far easier. And there wasn't an annoying advert to navigate around every single time you went to the site.
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,737
    Shame the Courage Best didn't stay aswell!
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    I'm sure many of us here on CL contributed to "YOUR VIEWS"
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    Also I have occassionly used it for research purposes.
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,983
    edited June 2013
    paulsturgess said:

    That just brings back unpleasant memories of the Johnstone's Paints Trophy.

    Was at the shootout loss to Brentford, think were as many Charlton fans as Brentford that night...

    image
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    check out the "your views" part of the website. Mega cringe.
  • Marriott110
    Marriott110 Posts: 1,528
    Weirdest thing is reading Jenkinson made his debut for eastbourne boro. since that change he's become argubly arsenals best right back.
  • CAFCdamo
    CAFCdamo Posts: 1,692
    Haha "Racon-stone's Paint Trophy" oh dear.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,362
    I really miss the old site
  • Cardinal Sin
    Cardinal Sin Posts: 5,233
    The new site is shite by comparison. Same as the yellow BBC Sport Football site - clearly no improvement on what they had previously.
  • Viewfinder
    Viewfinder Posts: 4,912
    I think the current official site is quite well written, but what bothers me is the resounding silence from Slater and Jimenez. You'd think they might make a statement to the fans occasionally, a progress report; how about a piece from them detailing how the new FFP rules will affect the club? A little warmth from them towards us would be very welcome....
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,056
    Viewfinder said:

    I think the current official site is quite well written, but what bothers me is the resounding silence from Slater and Jimenez. You'd think they might make a statement to the fans occasionally, a progress report; how about a piece from them detailing how the new FFP rules will affect the club? A little warmth from them towards us would be very welcome....

    Didn't Slater write an artifice last season about an away trip he went on supporting Man City ? Yep, we definitely want more of that !
  • Viewfinder
    Viewfinder Posts: 4,912
    Like it - artifice for article! Why don't they realise a bit of contact with us would be good PR? Or are they so shifty and shadowy that they prefer to lurk in the dark?
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,762
    edited June 2013
    I still don't bother with the web site now although I do like the way CAFC player is linked with all the other clubs .
  • Rob
    Rob Posts: 11,808
    Yep. Pretty bad now. Can't even bring myself to go on there. Shame.
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 573
    Rarely look at the new site, the old one was so much better.

    Prefer Charlton Life to catch up on club information.
  • AddickedAthletic
    AddickedAthletic Posts: 834
    mickc said:

    Rarely look at the new site, the old one was so much better.

    Prefer Charlton Life to catch up on club information.

    Same
  • illichassavedit
    illichassavedit Posts: 254
    AddickedAthletic said:

    mickc said:

    Rarely look at the new site, the old one was so much better.

    Prefer Charlton Life to catch up on club information.

    Same
    I suspect that this applies to most of us now?

  • Sponsored links:



  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,893
    The old site was far nicer, the current shared site is slow and clonky, and the font we've used is spidery too.

    And yes, it cost money to run our old website, and the new site should make us money, but the amounts are small beer really, when you consider the playing staff budget, so it was a real shame.
  • fattmatt
    fattmatt Posts: 581
    Remember this???

    http://cafc.digital-ink.co.uk/leaguetable.ink?team=P&pseason=2003/2004
  • DeeBee
    DeeBee Posts: 1,033
    Just reading about Alex Stavrinou, Tamer Tuna and Ben Davisson...wow
  • Viewfinder
    Viewfinder Posts: 4,912
    A posting on the official site this morning is headed 'Move Live Jagger in SE7'. Shouldn't that be 'Move Like Jagger...'? Typographical errors and tribute bands aside, shouldn't the official site carry some answers to our burning questions about the team and the club?
  • Viewfinder
    Viewfinder Posts: 4,912
    Today's posting about BWP's departure on the official site includes a reminder about the Welling game, which is being played at "Stonebridge Road". Let's hope no-one makes the trip to Ebbsfleet tomorrow. Shurely shome mishtake.
  • CAFCTrev
    CAFCTrev Posts: 5,983
    fattmatt said:

    Remember this???

    http://cafc.digital-ink.co.uk/leaguetable.ink?team=P&pseason=2003/2004

    Isnt 7th a Europa League position these days?

Categories

“Marketplace”