Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Has Shootershill gone the same way as Bromley?

2»

Comments

  • Baldybonce
    Baldybonce Posts: 9,640
    T.C.E said:

    buckshee said:

    Where in Shooters are you? On the hill itself?

    Ankerdine crescent.


    My mate and newly recruited addick lives there. I'll see what he knows.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    More taxpayer's money flushed down the drain running after a harmless drug.
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 573
    guinnessaddick said:

    How high up the hill?

    They might high at the bottom
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,617
    edited June 2013
    Jack and Jill went up the hill for a bit of a tiff.
    They came down rather happy.
    As a result of a locally supplied spliff.
  • man_at_milletts
    man_at_milletts Posts: 5,620
    T.C.E said:

    Sadly there was a police raid on the house two doors down from us yesterday morning and neighbours told us the house had used as a cannabis farm. Police questioned some of the neighbours (not us) and said they had been watching to house for sometime and there is a connection with the raid in Bromley!!
    We get a visit from a Bromley resident and three days later there's a drug raid, here's the question.
    Should I turn him in? ;)

    Sad sign of the times. They closed one down in Sparrows Lane about a year ago, nobody had an inkling. Not sure if anybody was caught.
  • nth_london_addick
    nth_london_addick Posts: 35,919
    I had a solid cast iron alibi

  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,651
    kentaddick said:

    More taxpayer's money flushed down the drain running after a harmless drug.

    That's a matter of opinion

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2002/aug/18/drugs.drugsandalcohol
  • legaladdick
    legaladdick Posts: 1,808
    As is this:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/6964971/Susan-Greenfield-should-have-been-sacked.html

    What exactly constitutes an 'expert' anyway?

    am sure that there have been many arguments on CL (I know that there have been a number at sociological, legal and Parliamentary levels) over the conflict between personal freedom ( I can harm myself if I choose) and the impact that personal decisions have on society. The classic was over the use of seatbelts (and for motorcyclists, crash helmets). In the end Parliament decided that the cost to society outweighed personal freeedom.

    Which makes the decision of continuing to outlaw cannabis against the (non) decision of outlawing tobacco so interesting.

  • maybe_baby
    maybe_baby Posts: 2,609
    edited July 2013
    LenGlover said:

    kentaddick said:

    More taxpayer's money flushed down the drain running after a harmless drug.

    That's a matter of opinion

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2002/aug/18/drugs.drugsandalcohol
    Hmmm, seen a few people in pubs who don't have the ability to reason...but then again Ethanol is on the poisons list so maybe I should have some pity for them.



  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,955
    legaladdick said:


    What exactly constitutes an 'expert' anyway?

    Definition of an expert: a person who knows more and more, about less and less.



    ;o)



  • Sponsored links:



  • BlackForestReds
    BlackForestReds Posts: 17,952
    What exactly constitutes an 'expert' anyway?

    Someone who used to be pert.
  • Rob
    Rob Posts: 11,786
    I used to live at 114 Ankerdine. Mind you, that was 50 years ago.

    Stuff like that was happening all the time back then.
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,955
    Rob said:

    I used to live at 114 Ankerdine. Mind you, that was 50 years ago.

    Stuff like that was happening all the time back then.

    The OB are still looking for you, Rob



Categories

“Marketplace”