Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kel Brook vs Carson Jones

Clem_Snide
Clem_Snide Posts: 11,737
in Other Football and Sports
Only just noticed this is on Sky tonight. Should be a decent fight.

Comments

  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    Decent undercard too. Selby got a real test here
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,736
    Brook to win on points. He knows what's coming this time. Carson is a menace.
  • stonewallpenalty
    stonewallpenalty Posts: 3,842
    edited July 2013
    Brook will be in better shape this time.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,070
    What a punch from Matthews!
  • JohnBoyUK
    JohnBoyUK Posts: 9,018
    Blimey, how did Matthews pull that one out of the bag. Cracking fight.
  • ISawLeaburnScore
    ISawLeaburnScore Posts: 9,779
    Brook will stop him in the second half of the fight
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,085
    Carson Jones looks a different fighter from their first fight.
  • adamtheaddick
    adamtheaddick Posts: 8,664
    why only 10 rounds? brook is caining him
  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    Brook looks in great shape
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,736
    The ref stopped that way too early . Jones was ok . Dodgy stoppage.
  • Sponsored links:



  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,736
    SELR_addicks said:

    Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.

    I agree that jones was unlikely to win but that is no reason to stop the fight . People would have had money on Brook to win on points.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,446
    Bedsaddick said:

    SELR_addicks said:

    Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.

    I agree that jones was unlikely to win but that is no reason to stop the fight . People would have had money on Brook to win on points.
    Had the attack on the ropes continued for another 30 seconds or minute, then it would've been a good stoppage. But the ref did definitely jump the gun at that point, he only hit him once on the ropes!
  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    Jones would have been stopped not long after

  • nolly
    nolly Posts: 12,122
    awful reffing and starting to spoil boxing , jones was onto a loser but no need to stop it
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Totally agree Dan. That and the knock down where he didn't touch down. Jones has a rite to be aggrieved
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,728
    Refs first priority is the safety of the boxer. Jones had lost every round IMO and was throwing nothing back. I agree it may have been slightly early but how long can you let a man be a moving punchbag
  • mickc
    mickc Posts: 573
    Croydon said:

    Refs first priority is the safety of the boxer. Jones had lost every round IMO and was throwing nothing back. I agree it may have been slightly early but how long can you let a man be a moving punchbag

    Exactly my thoughts, Jones had no response in him and was taking some heavy punches.
    At first It looked tactical to let Brooks wear himself down, Jones offered nothing till the fourth round and not much more for the rest of the contest.


  • stonewallpenalty
    stonewallpenalty Posts: 3,842
    Job of the réf is to stop it before he gets hurt. Good stoppage as he was taking heavy punches round after round. People will always disagree as they want to see more action.
  • THEMCA
    THEMCA Posts: 575
    Complete mismatch, don't really understand why he is fighting him again?
  • Sponsored links:



  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Jim What? seemed to think Jones kept getting back into it though.
  • THEMCA
    THEMCA Posts: 575
    Brooke won every round
  • stonewallpenalty
    stonewallpenalty Posts: 3,842
    edited July 2013
    I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    stonewallpenalty said:

    I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.

    Jim What? hasn't got a clue what he's saying to be fair. Bloke's a clown.
  • stonewallpenalty
    stonewallpenalty Posts: 3,842
    buckshee said:

    stonewallpenalty said:

    I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.

    Jim What? hasn't got a clue what he's saying to be fair. Bloke's a clown.
    Well thats how i translated it. Even though he is rarely clear.

Categories

“Marketplace”