Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Kel Brook vs Carson Jones

Only just noticed this is on Sky tonight. Should be a decent fight.

Comments

  • Decent undercard too. Selby got a real test here
  • Brook to win on points. He knows what's coming this time. Carson is a menace.
  • edited July 2013
    Brook will be in better shape this time.
  • What a punch from Matthews!
  • Blimey, how did Matthews pull that one out of the bag. Cracking fight.
  • Brook will stop him in the second half of the fight
  • Carson Jones looks a different fighter from their first fight.
  • why only 10 rounds? brook is caining him
  • Brook looks in great shape
  • The ref stopped that way too early . Jones was ok . Dodgy stoppage.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.
  • Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.

    I agree that jones was unlikely to win but that is no reason to stop the fight . People would have had money on Brook to win on points.
  • Stoppage wasn't the best but there was no way that Jones was going to win the fight from there. Eating punches for no gain.

    I agree that jones was unlikely to win but that is no reason to stop the fight . People would have had money on Brook to win on points.
    Had the attack on the ropes continued for another 30 seconds or minute, then it would've been a good stoppage. But the ref did definitely jump the gun at that point, he only hit him once on the ropes!
  • Jones would have been stopped not long after

  • awful reffing and starting to spoil boxing , jones was onto a loser but no need to stop it
  • Totally agree Dan. That and the knock down where he didn't touch down. Jones has a rite to be aggrieved
  • Refs first priority is the safety of the boxer. Jones had lost every round IMO and was throwing nothing back. I agree it may have been slightly early but how long can you let a man be a moving punchbag
  • Croydon said:

    Refs first priority is the safety of the boxer. Jones had lost every round IMO and was throwing nothing back. I agree it may have been slightly early but how long can you let a man be a moving punchbag

    Exactly my thoughts, Jones had no response in him and was taking some heavy punches.
    At first It looked tactical to let Brooks wear himself down, Jones offered nothing till the fourth round and not much more for the rest of the contest.


  • Job of the réf is to stop it before he gets hurt. Good stoppage as he was taking heavy punches round after round. People will always disagree as they want to see more action.
  • Complete mismatch, don't really understand why he is fighting him again?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Jim What? seemed to think Jones kept getting back into it though.
  • Brooke won every round
  • edited July 2013
    I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.
  • I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.

    Jim What? hasn't got a clue what he's saying to be fair. Bloke's a clown.
  • buckshee said:

    I think jim watt was saying brook keeps letting him off. Jones was never in it in a winning sense. He was allowed to get his senses back.

    Jim What? hasn't got a clue what he's saying to be fair. Bloke's a clown.
    Well thats how i translated it. Even though he is rarely clear.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!