Don't understand this if I'm honest, what's wood going to do that Taylor wasn't?? We should spending money on strikers who are going to keep us in the league
Don't understand this if I'm honest, what's wood going to do that Taylor wasn't?? We should spending money on strikers who are going to keep us in the league
Maybe he's cheaper than Taylor thus freeing up cash for a forward.
Don't understand this if I'm honest, what's wood going to do that Taylor wasn't?? We should spending money on strikers who are going to keep us in the league
Maybe he's cheaper than Taylor thus freeing up cash for a forward.
Why would you give a 33 year old more than a one year deal? Jesus, Golfie, get a grip. You're just looking for stuff to gripe about. It's a perfectly sensible decision.
Why would you give a 33 year old more than a one year deal? Jesus, Golfie, get a grip. You're just looking for stuff to gripe about. It's a perfectly sensible decision.
then why let Taylor go who was just as good and a lot younger ?? I doubt v. much if Taylor was on a big wedge.
it just seems to me that there is no plan - same with the strikers.
only players aged 36+ and crocks sign for that length of time
just shows we ain't got any money...
OR we're being sensible and not locking ourselves into long-term contracts that we can't afford if the worst happens.
what, so he can leave like the other 25 players next May...............good thinking !!
Jesus. We sign a player and you still get negativity. Dervite signed a one-year deal last summer and has just renewed. I very much doubt we'll lose 25 players next summer. A bit over the top that.
Some wrote Dervite off last year based on what they saw in pre-season. He's probably not at the level Powell hoped he'd be signing but most of his signings have turned out well. I trust Powell and his staff to get the best out of him if he plays. For now he's probably 4th choice and it's up to him to prove he's better than our other CBs. Don't see anything wrong with this signing, nothing wrong with a few older signings on short term deals.
Why would you give a 33 year old more than a one year deal? Jesus, Golfie, get a grip. You're just looking for stuff to gripe about. It's a perfectly sensible decision.
then why let Taylor go who was just as good and a lot younger ?? I doubt v. much if Taylor was on a big wedge.
it just seems to me that there is no plan - same with the strikers.
Matt Taylor wanted to play First Team football and Powell could not guarantee him that. He wanted to keep him but that's life.
Why would you give a 33 year old more than a one year deal? Jesus, Golfie, get a grip. You're just looking for stuff to gripe about. It's a perfectly sensible decision.
then why let Taylor go who was just as good and a lot younger ?? I doubt v. much if Taylor was on a big wedge.
it just seems to me that there is no plan - same with the strikers.
As a matter of interest, Matt Taylor is 4 years OLDER than Wood.
We're doomed! .(NOT!)...
Hey now, stop looking at facts and being logical, there's no call for that. Just accept WE'RE DOOMED TO DOOM DOOMILY and we'll all get along fine. Well apart from the rose tinted brigade...
Comments
only players aged 36+ and crocks sign for that length of time
just shows we ain't got any money...
what, so he can leave like the other 25 players next May...............good thinking !!
it just seems to me that there is no plan - same with the strikers.
what, so he can leave like the other 25 players next May...............good thinking !!
Jesus. We sign a player and you still get negativity. Dervite signed a one-year deal last summer and has just renewed. I very much doubt we'll lose 25 players next summer. A bit over the top that.
Interview in the SLP last week
We're doomed! .(NOT!)...
when we sign some lets moan about signing players.
If we do this we can moan continually because that's what we like to do and what we're best at.
Well some of the people on here anyway.