I also seem to remember Rivaldo saying he was the only English player would get anywhere near the Brazil side in 2002.
Indeed. Rivaldo said Gerrard was the best English player and he knew Brazil would beat England because Gerrard wasn't playing. But apparently Xavi's say is final!
I also seem to remember Rivaldo saying he was the only English player would get anywhere near the Brazil side in 2002.
Indeed. Rivaldo said gerrard was the best English player and he knew Brazil would beat England because Gerrard wasn't playing. But apparently Xavi's say is final!
I also seem to remember Rivaldo saying he was the only English player would get anywhere near the Brazil side in 2002.
Indeed. Rivaldo said gerrard was the best English player and he knew Brazil would beat England because Gerrard wasn't playing. But apparently Xavi's say is final!
I also seem to remember Rivaldo saying he was the only English player would get anywhere near the Brazil side in 2002.
Indeed. Rivaldo said gerrard was the best English player and he knew Brazil would beat England because Gerrard wasn't playing. But apparently Xavi's say is final!
Carragher must be on crack if he thinks Gerrard is the better player. I nearly choked on my tea when he said that last night.
Gerrard is by far a better all round player, Scholes a great passer but couldnt tackle or head the ball and as a CM they are important attributes to have!
Pretty sure Scholes has scored some pretty good headed goals in his career.
Scholes - For over a decade run the midfield of the most powerful club in the country that could buy any player they wanted to, to replace him, and who persuaded him to come out of retirement.
Gerrard - although Lampards goal record is ridiculous, I think Chelsea could have perfectly well coped without him, whereas Gerrard was for a long time a one man machine for Liverpool.
Scholes. The other two aren't in his class. Lampard next due to goal scoring ability. Gerrard third, but his passing range is shocking compared to the other two.
Very hard to argue with these two posts in my view. I'd add that based on what I've seen live, Lampard is a much better all round footballer than Gerrard.
Scholes. The other two aren't in his class. Lampard next due to goal scoring ability. Gerrard third, but his passing range is shocking compared to the other two.
Very hard to argue with these two posts in my view. I'd add that based on what I've seen live, Lampard is a much better all round footballer than Gerrard.
Comments
http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/latest-news/rivaldo-s-high-praise-for-gerrard
fab frankie
stevie g
thought the one eyed scousers comments on pique were especially ill delivered
shows us ur trophies
shows us ur trophy wife
Frank Lampard edges it for me.
All overrated a bit though. They used to be in 'best player in the world' consideration which made me laugh.
Lamphead
Scholes
Gerrard - although Lampards goal record is ridiculous, I think Chelsea could have perfectly well coped without him, whereas Gerrard was for a long time a one man machine for Liverpool.
Lampard - see above.
Of course all of them are below Parker....
Just look at Carrick today, better than both in 2013 and yet sits on the bench.
Very hard to argue with these two posts in my view. I'd add that based on what I've seen live, Lampard is a much better all round footballer than Gerrard.
Lampard
Gerrard
2. Lampard
3. Gerrard
There is someone you can't argue with.