Sorry if there is another post about this I could not find it anywhere
I was watching Plymouth V Portsmouth last week and noticed he was in goal for Plymouth,Is it just me or is that completely wrong,He got drunk crashed his car killing to INNOCENT YOUNG KIDS aged 8 and 10 had a 7 year jail term,Which by the way he served just under 4 years not to mention reports at the time suggested the last year and a half to 2 years he was allowed out every weekend to see his family.And now he is back playing professional football earning thousands of pounds a week as if nothing has happened,I know people will say he done his time but for what he done under 4 years and being allowed out at weekends is not doing his time.
I cant begin to imagine the feelings of them two boys family knowing he is playing football but they will never see their sons their grandsons or whoever again.
0
Comments
I abhor the act and feel for the family BUT he has served his time according to the laws of the land and it's his right to find employment.
Agreed with Gary - served his time but was it really justice?
What he did was dreadful, and I agree his punishment wasn't enough but that's down to the authorities so I would suggest you direct your grievances towards them rather than McCormick.
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/Luke-McCormick-allowed-jail-weekend-visits-home/story-12723090-detail/story.html#axzz2i5SzdtHB
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394867/Parents-blast-drink-driver-killed-boys-released-prison-weekend-trips.html
two different articles that say the same thing
So from their point of view he has served his time, is sorry for what he did, and is trying to get his life back on track.
he will not suffer anywhere near the amount of the poor family whose lives he has destroyed through his reckless and extremely piss poor judgment
but before you have a cardiac in your anger towards him,
if it was your son, your nephew, your grandson that had made this poor error of judgement would you forgive him
I would
If it was my kids he killed would I forgive him no I don't think I ever could, I would want to kill him and would not understand
you never know what's round the corner in life for anyone
I'm not saying I like it btw - I think it sucks the bag.
I know people that have regularly drunk so much that they couldn't stand up and then they drove several miles (not just two or three) and didn't have an accident. I'm also not just talking about late at night, sometimes in the middle of the day when it is perfectly reasonable to assume tat children would be out playing. Then one person has too much to drink, has a very short sleep then drives and causes an accident.
On the face of it the accident is a worse outcome, but the crime is getting into the car when drunk in the first place.
Thus you have to punish the crime of drink driving. The chap that has 'got away with it' for years was just lucky. The chap that causes an accident that hurts (or kills) someone was just 'less lucky' when drink driving.
I don't drink and drive and I wouldn't have a problem with all those caught drink driving given the same punishment that is, currently, handed out to those that kill people while drunk. However until that happens I can't help feeling that it is as 'unlucky' when a drunk causes an horrendous accident as it is 'lucky' when another one doesn't.
Having said that if a drunk killed my son in an accident his life would be limited to the time served.
I know people that have regularly drunk so much that they couldn't stand up and then they drove several miles (not just two or three) and didn't have an accident. I'm also not just talking about late at night, sometimes in the middle of the day when it is perfectly reasonable to assume tat children would be out playing. Then one person has too much to drink, has a very short sleep then drives and causes an accident.
On the face of it the accident is a worse outcome, but the crime is getting into the car when drunk in the first place.
Thus you have to punish the crime of drink driving. The chap that has 'got away with it' for years was just lucky. The chap that causes an accident that hurts (or kills) someone was just 'less lucky' when drink driving.
I don't drink and drive and I wouldn't have a problem with all those caught drink driving given the same punishment that is, currently, handed out to those that kill people while drunk. However until that happens I can't help feeling that it is as 'unlucky' when a drunk causes an horrendous accident as it is 'lucky' when another one doesn't.
Having said that if a drunk driver killed my son in an accident his life would be limited to the time served.
Holloway complained about this (McCormack actually went and proved the programme right by being dodgy in the match) and "The Scout" was removed from future programmes which was a shame as I thought it was a good part of it
Yes, he killed children. This is immutable and will never leave the argument
From what I've read, he got drunk at a wedding and then slept three hours before driving. For me this isn't as clear-cut as going on a bender and then driving immediately. Strikes me that he was stupid to think that this was enough time, but perhaps also a little unlucky
I would be very hesitant to re-employ him, but there it is. Nothing can be done. I don't see what good can come of further punishment
Says it all for me!
Cheers NLA
I spose when your kids are growing up you realise that the life path ahead is littered with obstacles some we can see some we cant
and being so judgemental on certain things is a dangerous thing to do although I can understand it
Undoubtedly McCormacks sentence was too light, but so too is the sentence handed down to those that consume the same amount of alcohol that he did.