This has been making me wonder for a while now -
With regards to kit clashes, how do the teams/refs decide on the colours to wear for games?
The reason I ask is that at least twice this season already, the ref and linos have worn a dark purple shirt with black shorts and socks when the away team were wearing all black (versus Wigan and, I think, Forest).
Was I alone in thinking this was too close for comfort? I remember at times during both those games momentarily thinking we'd played a bad ball because in my peripheral vision I thought the ref was an opponent.
In the recent past we've definitely seen refs in kit that is almost identical to one of the goalies too. (Maybe less of an issue, but still...)
So, do the refs have an alternative colour kit? Surely a yellow or green shirt would've made more sense in those games? Also, do they have to wear black shorts and socks? An alternative may have been better. I know they sometimes force the away side to change their kit if they think it's a problem, but why not change their own kit for the same reason?
Maybe it doesn't really matter? What do you think?
0
Comments
On Saturday the ref opted for the traditional black even though Randolph was all in black. Strange.
I do notice that ref's are in black most of the time this season and this has especially been notable in Newcastle matches where for several seasons ref's always worn yellow/green/pink etc.
I don't know what they have available in the Football League, but going out of that list, light blue seemed a feasible option.
Surely it is up to the refs to bring every colour top with them, and both teams to have both keeper tops so that an agreement can be reached.
that may say more about my eyesight than choice of kit though.
I thought that too when watching match of the day highlights.
umpirerefereeGuess it will never happen due to shirt sales but made the most sense.
I often can't remember what I had for dinner yesterday but read tangoflashes comment and immediately thought Steve Sherwood 1984 cup final.