If the rumors of John Gregory heading to manage Crawley are true I think it is a good move for him.
The difference between Curbs and Gregory is although they both have great experience, they have both been out of English football for a while, and while Gregory looks happy to go to a league 1 club, Curbs on the other hand seems to only want to manage a prem team.
IMO most teams in League 1 would love a manager like him and probably a few in the championship(Barnsley just sacked their manager) but I cant see any prem team taking him as he has been away to long.
0
Comments
Curbs record stands up there with the best in terms of what he acheived with the resources he had. Gregory's last two jobs in British football were at QPR in the Championship - sacked - and at Derby, whose relegation from the Premier League he oversaw before being sacked. Not a fair comparison.
J Block - not saying you're definitely wrong and I'm definitely right, but curious to know why you think it's changed so much since 2008?
Maybe Curbs should not have held back while taking West Ham to court and got back into management quickly, when over the long run he would have been financially better off.
As for the game changing, I don't see it. Maybe there are some tactical differences, like, one up top is more prevalent, but to assume Curbs is incapable of catching up with such changes seems bizarre to me. I tend to agree with Danny Baker on this point: sometimes football's a lot simpler than we like to make out. Nobody admits that because it would undermine the excitement, and put lots of pundits out of work.