Don't know who this guy is, guessing he is american.
bbc.co.uk/sport/football/25362744A leading campaigner on head injuries in sport has called for a ban on children heading the ball when playing football.
Chris Nowinski is a former professional wrestler and suffered from concussion because of regular blows to the head when playing college American football.
Nowinski told BBC Radio 5 live: "In football, introduce heading at a later age."
He also said that children should not be allowed to play contact sports.
He added: "If we have so many other options out there, like we get them running and being active, why play sports which include hundreds of blows to the head, knowing how bad the consequences are?
"It's much smarter to do it when they're teenagers and in their 20s when the brain is more developed and there are medical people on the sidelines during games.
"We can still play those games without contact but who thinks it's a good idea to hit a 10-year-old in the head 200 or 300 times a season?"
Nowinski suffered a serious concussion in June 2003, but due to a lack of understanding about his symptoms, he continued to wrestle and work out for five weeks while symptomatic.
He developed post-concussion syndrome and was forced to retire.
Since then, he has co-founded the Sports Legacy Institute (SLI), a non-profit organisation dedicated to studying sports concussion through education, policy, and research.
Nowinski added that the concussion doctor who treated him said "no sport should have repetitive brain trauma and tolerate it before they reach high school, age 14".
He said: "A new study came out in the US two days ago showing repetitive brain trauma is still causing brain damage.
"Based on all this research, we know we're giving some of those kids a chance of brain damage because we choose to introduce contact so young."
Nowinski adds that children need to be better educated about the symptoms of concussion.
He said: "Why not make it as safe as we can, as long as entertainment value is there? We have to consider most of the people playing that sport are children.
"By definition they do not have informed consent and they do not have physical maturity, but most are playing the same sport, by the same rules with same dangers. In that respect it's idiotic.
"Study after study will tell you that athletes don't report when they have concussion and try to play through to be a hero - but they don't realise they have a concussion as no one has sat them down and explained what it is."
Dr Martin Raftery, the International Rugby Board's (IRB) chief medical officer, is in favour of implementing safety measures, rather than banning youngsters from playing sport.
"In our sport, what we're doing is trying to protect the athlete where there is a risk," he said.
Rugby's new guidelines say a player suspected of suffering from concussion must leave the field for a medical inspection and can only return if cleared of the injury.
Previously, any player suspected of suffering from concussion had to leave the pitch and take a week off, a period already reduced from three weeks under an earlier rule.
In October, Tottenham were described as "irresponsible" by brain injury charity Headway for allowing goalkeeper Hugo Lloris to play on against Everton after losing consciousness.
But Headway spokesman Luke Griggs said that banning children from heading in football was not the answer.
Griggs told BBC Sport: "For us, the key is not being as drastic as to ban children from contact sport. It's more about improving awareness among coaches, referees and, importantly, parents. A minor injury can have consequences so it's about dealing with them immediately, so we need to raise awareness.
"There is limited research which shows the danger of heading and it will need more research before we contemplate supporting that. There is merit in what Chris says, but banning kids is not the way forward. It's about awareness."
The Football Association declined to comment. However, England's governing body use size three balls until Under 15 level, when size five balls are introduced.
Comments
This guy has come from a different sport; and I get the impression that he's extrapolating results from a study based around a different sport, and trying to shoehorn them elsewhere. Not quite how research works..
It stands to reason that multiple head injuries are going to cause long term issues, that's common sense. To suggest the answer is to not allow kids to take part till they're 14 is incredibly short-sighted though. He suggests alternatives such as running: if we're going to approach running with the same point of view then the impact on the knees at such a young age probably isn't going to be very nice when their older either. Everything has risks; it's about minimising those risks though.
However, to steer the subject back to the "What's wrong with English football?" thread: if you prevented players from heading the ball till they were 14 then surely this could indeed reinforce "playing on the deck" to younger children, right?
I think she was being swayed, as LR alludes to, by the problem that US sports have with soccer. Its the big enemy to them and they do and say anything to try to knock it back.
Regardless, from experience of watching my son, kids do not like heading a football until they get into their teens.
Griggs told BBC Sport: "For us, the key is not being as drastic as to ban children from contact sport. It's more about improving awareness among coaches, referees and, importantly, parents. A minor injury can have consequences so it's about dealing with them immediately, so we need to raise awareness.
"There is limited research which shows the danger of heading and it will need more research before we contemplate supporting that. There is merit in what Chris says, but banning kids is not the way forward. It's about awareness."
I think that a proper study of this should be carried out by both the medical and sporting bodies to come to a conclusive answer to this before people take this as a conclusive bit of research. No one wants to see young people being stopped from enjoying sport, least of all myself who spent over 15 years as a junior league manager, and Kent manager until last year. In fact the great majority of my sons team are still playing in the Saturday league today. Football is a contact sport, and the clubs that I have been involved with do not practice heading until secondary school. I agree about keeping the ball on the deck, my concern is that this could cause kids and parents not to participate in football at whatever level. When I started managing it was popular to say that it should not be competitive, I do not mean elite, but children enjoying football, getting a level of fitness, and learning to be part of the team. We started at the c division in the Bexley league and managed after a few seasons to get to Kent level. You do get the occasional team that takes it too seriously, but especially at primary level it has to be about enjoyment, and learning, or trying to learn. I played to win, but not at any cost. The five a side competitions were especially enjoyable, where heading obviously does not take a part in this. I could be convinced, but would want to know far more about the evidence, and the proposals about the game for youngsters.
It should be up to the child and their parents to decide whether they want to get involved in contact sports. At the least, the potential pitfalls should be pointed out. I would be in favour of at least annual medical check ups for all youngsters who take part in contact sports.
They absorbed mud and water. Get one of those on top of your bonce at pace and you'd see stars....
There may or may not be a correlation.