Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Blatter's oppo goes all rubgy on us.

This fella has to be better than that ghastly weasel Blatter?
Lovin the ideas, even if he is French.

''Orange cards proposed by Fifa candidate Jerome Champagne

Fifa presidential candidate Jerome Champagne has suggested introducing orange cards that would allow referees to send players to a sin-bin.
The Frenchman, 55, launched his bid to succeed Sepp Blatter as the world governing body's president on Monday.
He also wants to punish teams when players question officials and hopes football will consider using more technology for key decisions.

His other proposals include:
Quotas for foreign players
Implementing rugby's rule where only the captain can talk to the referee with a free-kick advanced 10 yards for any dissent
Abolishing the 'triple punishment' rule where a player who prevents a goalscoring opportunity in the penalty areas concedes a spot-kick, is sent off and also suspended
All Fifa presidential candidates taking part in live debates on television and in front of the six continental confederations
Making public the salary of the Fifa president and leading officials''
«1

Comments

  • Options
    Didn't we have the 10 yard rule afew years back ?
  • Options
    Blimey. Sounds remarkably sensible. Can he really be a candidate to run FIFA?!!
  • Options

    Didn't we have the 10 yard rule afew years back ?

    Yup and the first time it was used, I believe was at the Valley, possibly against Paulo Wanchope then of Man City.

    Think the ten yard rule should have been move the ball up to ten yards in the direction of direction of choice.

  • Options
    vffvff
    edited January 2014
    Whats needed is a maximum 2 terms as president.

    Blatter has had 5 terms hence the alleged dodgy practises.

  • Options
    I like these proposals, I'm sure I'm not alone in being completely fed up with players berating officials (thats our job!) and all the diving and feigning injury, really gets on my man boobs, something needs to be done. And don't get me started on the amount of foreign players, especially in the premiership, he gets my vote, if I only had one!
  • Options
    Agreed BA - been going on for too long now.
  • Options
    edited January 2014
    We finally got a common man of the people as an alternative option to the modern day al capone

    and that commoner was called Champagne

    you could not make it up
  • Options
    Wasn't Platini going to stand ?
  • Options
    The 10 yard thing was stopped because half the time players didn't want to advance 10 yards. Allowing only captains to talk to refs might work, but if a goalkeeper is captain and there's some discussion about an attacking corner then that might be difficult. (A few yellows being shown would reduce it, you would think). The triple punishment, well the more stupid thing is when a player is fouled and needs treatment, his team take a free kick whilst reduced to 10 men, a double disadvantage. TV debate - what's the point, we don't have a vote. Salaries, so what. They are big.
  • Options
    Kap10 said:

    Didn't we have the 10 yard rule afew years back ?

    Yup and the first time it was used, I believe was at the Valley, possibly against Paulo Wanchope then of Man City.

    Think the ten yard rule should have been move the ball up to ten yards in the direction of direction of choice.

    Great rule, which the FA ruined by making the Ref book the player penalised, as a result it was rarely enforced
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options

    Wasn't Platini going to stand ?

    platini, IMO, has his eye on european club super leagues. He wont stand. Even this fella has said he has no chance of winning. Absolutely no democracy. Sepp is a joke. Doesnt even pay his taxes domestically.

    Im gonna stand outside the hotel where they hold the elections in my rufus 5 shirt giving it some VFR.


    i will last all of 2 minutes before I am escorted away

    i.will

  • Options
    i-am
  • Options
    Sounds all very sensible. Personally I would like to see an end to penalties, they have just become meaningless in the sense that teams set out to win games by winning penalties.
  • Options
    I really hope that the foreign player quota comes in, take Man City for instance, who have a real chance of winning multiple trophies this season, including the Champions League. What pride can their fans or ANY British football fans for that matter, take in them winning any trophy when their team will probably have just ONE British player, the goalkeeper!
  • Options
    W

    i-am

    Willian ;)
  • Options
    The foreign quota rule is not going to happen, too much money being made for that to get through.

    I do like the Orange Card, too many games get ruined by stupid sendings off, in my view for two 'technical' offences then a players should be replaced by a substitute (as in Basketball) and his team not reduced to 10-men which ruins the game.

    I mean, if a bloke gets booked for taking his shirt off after scoring and the booked again for not retreating from a free-kick and then sent off then his team has not actually gained any advantage.

    Of course, if a centre half decides to take out the opposition number 10 with a two-footed tackle then that deserves a red card and his team do deserve to lose a player.

    Would also like to see much stricter penalties on "simulation" and - most importantly of all - immediate bookings for players who indicate to a referee that another player should be booked/sent-off by making that stupid card-showing gesture, I HATE that so much.
  • Options
    I thought that the 'card showing' gesture was already an automatic booking?
  • Options
    Will be found guilty of corruption by the end of 2014. Everyone who goes up against blatter does. Very strange that.
  • Options
    Not a fan of the orange card (sin bin) idea as can see the penalised team just time wasting or playing keep ball at the back for the duration of the penalty. Could see the game becone very slow and stagnant.

    this guy is also a big advocate of technology in football. In an interview he says that fans in a stadium can see if a player is off side using their smart phones in seconds after seeing it live in front of them, so why are the officials not utilising this.
  • Options
    Our friend Charles Sale in the DM:

    Champagne goes flat

    Former Fifa executive Jerome Champagne’s launch of his bid for the FIFA presidency in London on Monday turned out to be nothing more than a vanity project.
    Champagne, who is funding his own campaign, spoke about his desire to globalise football’s world governing body and give more influence to the national associations — especially mending bridges with the FA.
    He carefully chose as a venue for his press conference the Connaught Rooms, where the FA was founded 151 years ago.
    But Champagne was not prepared to name any of the five federations he needs to support his candidature, nor whether he would even stand if Sepp Blatter puts himself forward — as is widely expected — for a fifth term.
    And by refusing to say anything that could be seen as anti-Blatter, Champagne boosted the conspiracy theory that wily old Sepp is pulling his strings in an effort to derail UEFA president Michel Platini’s more relevant challenge.
    The surreal occasion included an amateurish video of Pele endorsing Champagne in a number of languages. It was anything but convincing.

    Dominic Cork, one of Alan Brazil’s roster of co-presenters on his talkSPORT breakfast show, has embraced commercial radio to the extent of shamelessly plugging Derbyshire firm Kedleston Windows, who are working on his conservatory.



    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/article-2543001/Graeme-Swann-set-offered-role-Sky-TV-Thierry-Henry-plays-waiting-game-Charles-Sale.html#ixzz2r2ojAeA7
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Great idea, about time we shut the overpaid bully boys up.
  • Options
    Mog ...nice. great info
  • Options
    Just in from the Guardian.....

    In a campaign launch that immediately risked going flat Jérôme Champagne has fired the starting gun on the race to become Fifa president but immediately cast doubt on whether he could win.

    In an assessment that was either starkly realistic or based on a belief that Sepp Blatter, 77, would not stand, the former senior Fifa executive admitted he would struggle to win if the incumbent ran for a fifth term.

    The frank admission – and a refusal to say whether he would even stand if Blatter did – immediately prompted questions about Champagne's motives but the 55-year-old former diplomat said he was not running at Blatter's behest to flush out potential challengers nor was he running for PR reasons.

    "I am not doing it for personal profile. I don't know if Mr Blatter will stand or not. I am running alone, myself, with my ideas," said Champagne, who also unveiled Pele as his first high-profile backer. Asked whether he could beat Blatter, Champagne said: "No, I don't think [so]. He is a person of relevance but it's a very hypothetical question. A lot of things can happen."
  • Options
    The closer the game gets to rugby the worse it will become.
  • Options
    Why do you say that FoD? I think only the captain being allowed to speak to referees, sin bins and ten meter penalties ( if the team wishes to take them ) would be an improvement.
  • Options
    Blatter's using this sap as a convenient way of deflecting attention away from himself. He'll 'run for election' again and he will 'win' again because every tinpot footballing nation on Earth is in his back pocket. Him and Valcke are the most corrupt officials in sport, everyone knows it but nothing is ever done about it.

    I have absolutely no idea why the major football nations don't set up a completely rival organisation. Nobody has ever been able to convince me that there isn't a valid reason for it. With the amount of cash FIFA trousers for itself, surely basic commercial sensibilities alone are enough to persuade the big countries to set up a rival? All it would need is England, Germany, Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Spain, France and Holland - the sponsors would immediately ditch FIFA (who the fuck wants to pay billions to sponsor Ukraine vs Costa Rica?) and eliminate their revenue in one fell swoop.
  • Options
    cause switz is a great place to wash money

  • Options
    Agreed. So what's to stop them all setting up a rival organisation in the Cayman Islands? Or Switzerland, for that matter?
  • Options

    Blatter's using this sap as a convenient way of deflecting attention away from himself. He'll 'run for election' again and he will 'win' again because every tinpot footballing nation on Earth is in his back pocket. Him and Valcke are the most corrupt officials in sport, everyone knows it but nothing is ever done about it.

    I have absolutely no idea why the major football nations don't set up a completely rival organisation. Nobody has ever been able to convince me that there isn't a valid reason for it. With the amount of cash FIFA trousers for itself, surely basic commercial sensibilities alone are enough to persuade the big countries to set up a rival? All it would need is England, Germany, Brazil, Argentina, Italy, Spain, France and Holland - the sponsors would immediately ditch FIFA (who the fuck wants to pay billions to sponsor Ukraine vs Costa Rica?) and eliminate their revenue in one fell swoop.

    Have been saying the same for some time. I don't even think you would need France and Holland initially, get the first six on board and the others would follow like a shot. Although you might need them to form an alternative to the Champions league, as Blatter would use expulsion from that as way of trying to get the greedy clubs to force the hands of the respective football associations.
  • Options
    Champion's League is a UEFA competition though. FIFA don't have a say in who competes in it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!