Grammar Police check needed
Comments
-
My own sentance is grammatically incorrect also!0
-
The world is yours0
-
"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
2 -
BololkcsCharlton_Stu said:"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
4 -
Humour me. This anecdote is worth it...
A bright freshman student from Texas arrives for the first time at Harvard.Trying to find his way around he asks two random second year students - all New England posh, in that irritating Loyd Grossman style - if they can tell him "where the library's at?" Snorting with pomposity they reply "At Harvard, we never finish a sentence with a preposition." The boy from the south ponders a response, then quietly but confidently replies "Sorry fellas. Can you tell me where the library's at, assholes?"
A story you can tell the next pedantic Grammar Nazi tosser who attempts to judge your use of English.0 -
I don't get what this thread are about0
-
Either.0
- Sponsored links:
-
0
-
Yes, because the record belongs to it.LargeAddick said:is and its of course, any doughnut would know that ;-)
shouldn't the its be it's?
0 -
This!MrOneLung said:
No because the WE is the plural part not the Charlton.Henry Irving said:So we should be singing "We is the greatest team the world has ever seen" and "we is Charlton,
Coming inCovered End" : - )
Thanks guys,
PS Only on Charlton Life would this question get so many responses : - )
On Strictly they say ' the first couple through is....'
We can never be followed by is! Charlton Athletic IS singular, there IS only one. We ARE Charlton, as a collective group of supporters we ARE plural.0 -
That means that Charlton is an adjective, like "we are red".sadiejane1981 said:
This!MrOneLung said:
No because the WE is the plural part not the Charlton.Henry Irving said:So we should be singing "We is the greatest team the world has ever seen" and "we is Charlton,
Coming inCovered End" : - )
Thanks guys,
PS Only on Charlton Life would this question get so many responses : - )
On Strictly they say ' the first couple through is....'
We can never be followed by is! Charlton Athletic IS singular, there IS only one. We ARE Charlton, as a collective group of supporters we ARE plural.
The other issue is when anyone says"I'm going Charlton tomorrow", in which case Charlton might even be a verb.
0 -
When this situation arises, best to have a guide, is it. Mine, yoda is. Hmmmmmm.0
-
That is correct, supporters are Charlton is an adjective, similar as to say I am a Charlton girl, it's like me saying I am a good girl; Charlton and good are both adjectives.0
-
Isn't this about customer service?0
-
1
-
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:0 - Sponsored links:
-
No, no, no! Manchester United is not a very good team, innit.thai malaysia addick said:It's a common mistake - even from seasoned journalists. They might put "Manchester United are a good team". It's "Manchester United is a good team".
1 -
.
Pah, I don't piss about with them, Chizz, commas and colons is where it's at.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:
0 -
Nopelimeygent said:
Yes, because the record belongs to it.LargeAddick said:is and its of course, any doughnut would know that ;-)
shouldn't the its be it's?
http://www.its-not-its.info/
"its" is used for a neutral possessor, "his" and "her" being the masculine and feminine versions.
Sorry0 -
Full stops go inside parentheses if an entire sentence is inside the parentheses.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:0 -
I am sure you are making up words now.cafcfan said:
Full stops go inside parentheses if an entire sentence is inside the parentheses.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:
;-)
0 -
Correct, another one to join the queue outside the headmaster's door.cafcfan said:
Full stops go inside parentheses if an entire sentence is inside the parentheses.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:
0 -
In AMERICAN English (and there's an oxymoron for you) this is correct. But in BRITISH English, the full stop goes after the end parenthesis.cafcfan said:
Full stops go inside parentheses if an entire sentence is inside the parentheses.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:
(Incidentally, I love the comment (falsely) attributed to HM the Queen: "There is no such thing as American English. There is English and there are mistakes").
0 -
Are you sure? A number of British Organisations, including the Bank Of England, disagree with you. So does The Economist's style guide, which has all sorts of interesting information on a wide array of topics, not just grammar.Chizz said:
In AMERICAN English (and there's an oxymoron for you) this is correct. But in BRITISH English, the full stop goes after the end parenthesis.cafcfan said:
Full stops go inside parentheses if an entire sentence is inside the parentheses.Chizz said:
(Note, particularly good use of the comma there). (Full stop).man_at_milletts said:
(Incidentally, I love the comment (falsely) attributed to HM the Queen: "There is no such thing as American English. There is English and there are mistakes").
bordeure.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/the-economist-style-guide.pdf
For example, I've just found out that the horrible American use of "gotten" is not some dreadful mangling of English English but instead is how we used to speak at the time the Mayflower set sail. It's just that the Americans haven't moved on in the intervening four centuries.0