Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Stefan Maierhofer

2»

Comments

  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,147
    Why are we even discussing this !(shakes head)
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,562
    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,353
    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
  • Born in Barnehurst, so I support my local team, Charlton! ;-)

    Out here I support the Wiener Sportklub. They are now in the Austrian equivalent of League 1. When I first arrived here (1979), they were in the top league with Rapid and Austria. They still have a very loyal, but much smaller fanbase, so they are similar to Charlton in many ways.

    Of the so-called "Big Two", I would always favour Rapid. They still play a more direct, "English", style of football. See my comments about Maierhofer. Austria Vienna would never, ever, have signed a player like him.

  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,562

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    He's hard to miss. Bolton and Fulham are shit and I doubt the QPR link has any substance as he's already had a failed trial previously. He'd have a club if he had much about him.
  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,353
    Talal said:

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    He's hard to miss. Bolton and Fulham are shit and I doubt the QPR link has any substance as he's already had a failed trial previously. He'd have a club if he had much about him.
    not necessarily he does not have to rush a decision and might be taking his time, look at someone like Max Clayton been out of contract for ages and just signed for Bolton, and Maierhofer has rejected an offer from Millwall already
  • Talal said:

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    He's hard to miss. Bolton and Fulham are shit and I doubt the QPR link has any substance as he's already had a failed trial previously. He'd have a club if he had much about him.
    not necessarily he does not have to rush a decision and might be taking his time, look at someone like Max Clayton been out of contract for ages and just signed for Bolton, and Maierhofer has rejected an offer from Millwall already

    If the Millwall offer was based on "goals scored", he would die of starvation. Better for him to wait for some other mugs to turn up. I just hope we don't fall for this "agents talk".
  • Have we signed him Yet!
  • Fiiiiiish
    Fiiiiiish Posts: 1,671

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    You're right, their player policies are clearly front running and they only sign class.....

    You couldn't ask for 3 worse teams to show he is crap.
  • Is he on twitter? whats he saying? Has he got a burger stuffed in his gob?

  • Sponsored links:



  • paulie8290
    paulie8290 Posts: 23,353
    Fiiiiiish said:

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    You're right, their player policies are clearly front running and they only sign class.....

    You couldn't ask for 3 worse teams to show he is crap.
    Welling dartford Bromley

    Done
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,860
    Fuck you're annoying aren't you.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,213
    Hasn't he signed.for Chesterfield....?
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,166
    edited September 2014
    There's even a guy from Vienna saying the player's rubbish yet because someone's realised (a) he's available, and (b) can read a Wikipedia profile, they won't leave it alone.
  • I woud not spend a penny on Maierhofer. You must have hundreds like him in England.
  • Born in Barnehurst, so I support my local team, Charlton! ;-)

    Out here I support the Wiener Sportklub. They are now in the Austrian equivalent of League 1. When I first arrived here (1979), they were in the top league with Rapid and Austria. They still have a very loyal, but much smaller fanbase, so they are similar to Charlton in many ways.

    Of the so-called "Big Two", I would always favour Rapid. They still play a more direct, "English", style of football. See my comments about Maierhofer. Austria Vienna would never, ever, have signed a player like him.

    So you sometimes can be found in Dornbach? I watched Wr. Sportclub v. AS Roma.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,278
    He has played for three English clubs; all at or below our level. He scored just 3 goals in 23 appearances for them. That's a 13% scoring rate. Compare that to our very own Simon Church who last season had a 16% scoring rate. Why are we even entertaining this idea?
  • thewolfboy
    thewolfboy Posts: 2,948
    He was very unfit when he joined Millwall. Just sort of lopes about the pitch. He obviously wins a lot of headers when he comes on as a sub but they usually go nowhere. I think he improved a bit at Millwall but they decided not to offer him a contract. Think he is a bit of a nob...thinks he is better than he is. We are better off with George.
  • Fiiiiiish
    Fiiiiiish Posts: 1,671

    Fiiiiiish said:

    Talal said:

    Paulie you don't have to be anything Vienna to know that Maierhofer is shit. I honestly think Bikey would be more effective up top than him.

    Clearly not that shit if QPR, Bolton and Fulham are looking at him
    You're right, their player policies are clearly front running and they only sign class.....

    You couldn't ask for 3 worse teams to show he is crap.
    Welling dartford Bromley

    Done
    Yet those 3 are too good for him.
  • He was very unfit when he joined Millwall. Just sort of lopes about the pitch. He obviously wins a lot of headers when he comes on as a sub but they usually go nowhere. I think he improved a bit at Millwall but they decided not to offer him a contract. Think he is a bit of a nob...thinks he is better than he is. We are better off with George.

    I agree with that. His actual strength is his exaggerated self-confidence.

  • Sponsored links:



  • mrbligh
    mrbligh Posts: 3,057
    If Maierhofer is the answer we are asking the wrong question
  • Redhenry
    Redhenry Posts: 5,365
    Most people in football were staggered when Wolves splashed 1.8m on this fella. Wolves soon realised their mistake and he only played half a dozen games for them. Church is a lot better!
  • Old and past it. Hardly fits the Duchatelet model. Move on.