Evening, Blackpool here.
Just to let you know Jose met with a few BFC fans last night, Sky and a couple of national papers present. No doubt it'll be mainly about his time at Pool but you may want to keep an eye out. Check out
http://fansonline.net/blackpool/mb/index.php . See you in December. UTP
Comments
That was definitely a job well worth avoiding!
Caption Competition
Lee Clark: He could have done this Interview before I accepted this bloody job!!
Very dignified response. Didn't slag off Oyston and said he'd learned from the experience.
Only strengthens my respect for the man and i do hope he finds a role to shine in as I really feel he deserves it.
Paul Ince spent so long trying to get the best deal for his son he forgot all about the club he was managing, by the time the sacked him it was to late the slide had begun, they then hired a cheap inexperienced manager who was appalling and barely kept them up. lost all their players in the summer and are now in the position they are in.
IMO If Tom Ince was not at Blackpool or his dad was not his agent I think Blackpool would be in a stronger position now.
Well looks like if Sheff U does not work out there, is a home for Ched Evans somewhere.
That wasn't an interview in the sense that most people imagine one. The tell tale signs are the sentence below the Mail version; the fact that the Guardian version is almost identical to the Mail, and the clear indication from that that his agent maintained control of the interview at freak levels. In a normal interview, Daniel Taylor would have asked things like, why didn't you stay on at Charlton, was that anything to do with you walking out of Standard? And did you really not know what kind of reputation Oyston had?
I like what I've seen of Jose Riga, think he did a great job for us, and wish him well. But those things I've mentioned leave me with just a little uneasy feeling. Maybe somewhere there lies the clue as to why RD didn't keep him on. Or maybe not. But that sort of controlled stuff leaves me very wary whenever I come up against it.
As for his ending with Charlton, he was an interim manager who came to the end of his contract and left, that's what happens.
"Jose Riga appears courtesy of Chris Nathaniel NVA Entertainment Group. Click here for more information"
Sorry, that jarred with me. Just me, I guess.
Oyston has claimed, for example, that Riga approved all the signings. It's clear to most that in reality Riga had no option because he wasn't given one. Oyston claimed that Riga decided not to keep McGahey, whereas in fact he'd not given Riga the option to keep him.
Riga's (or his agent's) arranged a meeting where he can talk in general terms about his experiences about Blackpool, present what he wants but which still provides the invited press - and Blackpool Gazette's absence is of interest - with the angle they need to launch into Oyston. Riga comes out of it with his reputation intact. Everyone's a winner.
And frankly, I couldn't care less if it was staged to the hilt - the Oystons' dreadful ownership of a great and traditional club needs addressing. I heard somewhere that KO was advising the Football League (or is it the FA) on the fit and proper owner's test - if true, you couldn't make it up.
Good luck Jose.
I've woken up at 4am and gone straight onto CharltonLife.
Anyway, I must get back to the point in question.
Putting aside the mountain of off the field blunders and nastiness, surely getting rid of Jose Riga first time around is one of the biggest mistakes of Duchatelet/Meire/Keohane.
In addition to being a very good coach, he was a gentleman, and I wish him well.
Roland "Hold my beer......"