Was hoping to use the video in an alternative way, but require his/her permission to do so.
But you already have ....... Ever heard of IPR or can I just borrow your photographs ...... and then sell them off to a third party. Can i use your drone photos of the valley..... if I credit them ? Just asking
Was hoping to use the video in an alternative way, but require his/her permission to do so.
But you already have ....... Ever heard of IPR or can I just borrow your photographs ...... and then sell them off to a third party. Can i use your drone photos of the valley..... if I credit them ? Just asking
That's incorrect.
Once the video owner posts it on You Tube then according to their T&Cs it automatically becomes public and can be shared anywhere as long as its via You Tube.
News Shopper have simply embedded the You Tube video on their site - that's perfectly legal as the video is still delivered by You Tube.
Was hoping to use the video in an alternative way, but require his/her permission to do so.
But you already have ....... Ever heard of IPR or can I just borrow your photographs ...... and then sell them off to a third party. Can i use your drone photos of the valley..... if I credit them ? Just asking
That's incorrect.
Once the video owner posts it on You Tube then according to their T&Cs it automatically becomes public and can be shared anywhere as long as its via You Tube.
News Shopper have simply embedded the You Tube video on their site - that's perfectly legal as the video is still delivered by You Tube.
Many broadcast employees, as well as many others throughout society, think that if something is on the Internet, it is there to be used by others, and no rights need to be obtained to use that material. That is incorrect, and can get users into trouble. In recent months, we have seen many lawsuits filed against broadcasters, including against some of the biggest broadcasters in the country, over improper use of photographs found on the Internet By David Oxenford on February 14, 2014 Posted in Appearances, Intellectual Property, Internet Video, Music Rights, On Line Media, Website Issues
Been the talk of the last week, not gonna keep promoting it. Everyone mentions Katrien but at the end of the day A FELLOW FAN has been sneakily filmed in a snidely way and published without his permission when he has actually done nothing wrong. Needs a line drawn under it now.
Been the talk of the last week, not gonna keep promoting it. Everyone mentions Katrien but at the end of the day A FELLOW FAN has been sneakily filmed in a snidely way and published without his permission when he has actually done nothing wrong. Needs a line drawn under it now.
Was hoping to use the video in an alternative way, but require his/her permission to do so.
But you already have ....... Ever heard of IPR or can I just borrow your photographs ...... and then sell them off to a third party. Can i use your drone photos of the valley..... if I credit them ? Just asking
That's incorrect.
Once the video owner posts it on You Tube then according to their T&Cs it automatically becomes public and can be shared anywhere as long as its via You Tube.
News Shopper have simply embedded the You Tube video on their site - that's perfectly legal as the video is still delivered by You Tube.
Many broadcast employees, as well as many others throughout society, think that if something is on the Internet, it is there to be used by others, and no rights need to be obtained to use that material. That is incorrect, and can get users into trouble. In recent months, we have seen many lawsuits filed against broadcasters, including against some of the biggest broadcasters in the country, over improper use of photographs found on the Internet By David Oxenford on February 14, 2014 Posted in Appearances, Intellectual Property, Internet Video, Music Rights, On Line Media, Website Issues
Yes - I cannot just go onto Ken from Bexley's website and copy your pictures onto my own site - that is illegal.
However, if you post those pictures on You Tube you are giving permission for their free dissemination - as long as it takes place within the You Tube channel.
I imagine that's why NewsShopper wants to contact the owner because he wants to use the video outside You Tube.
Been the talk of the last week, not gonna keep promoting it. Everyone mentions Katrien but at the end of the day A FELLOW FAN has been sneakily filmed in a snidely way and published without his permission when he has actually done nothing wrong. Needs a line drawn under it now.
I agree - Airman is correct in saying that the conversation was in a public place so is therefore not privy to some of the normal conventions.
However, my understanding is that without a clear public interest you cannot post video of people without their actual verbal or written consent - that does not stop it happening of course!
This is certainly how my employer behaves in this regard - we even get verbal permission to film from bystanders who are in a background shot.
Comments
Was hoping to use the video in an alternative way, but require his/her permission to do so.
http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/sport/11714964.Charlton_s_Peeters_dismisses_rumours_of_the_sack/?ref=ar
or can I just borrow your photographs ...... and then sell them off to a third party.
Can i use your drone photos of the valley..... if I credit them ?
Just asking
Once the video owner posts it on You Tube then according to their T&Cs it automatically becomes public and can be shared anywhere as long as its via You Tube.
News Shopper have simply embedded the You Tube video on their site - that's perfectly legal as the video is still delivered by You Tube.
By David Oxenford on February 14, 2014
Posted in Appearances, Intellectual Property, Internet Video, Music Rights, On Line Media, Website Issues
Where is HIS bouquet of flowers?
However, if you post those pictures on You Tube you are giving permission for their free dissemination - as long as it takes place within the You Tube channel.
I imagine that's why NewsShopper wants to contact the owner because he wants to use the video outside You Tube.
However, my understanding is that without a clear public interest you cannot post video of people without their actual verbal or written consent - that does not stop it happening of course!
This is certainly how my employer behaves in this regard - we even get verbal permission to film from bystanders who are in a background shot.