Valley Review from Tuesday...
Comments
-
I wonder when we'll next play Spurs in the league.Ollywozere said:
It was used both in the 1930s and 1940s.shirty5 said:The claim that the cover is from the 40's is incorrect. The Cover is from the late 1930's.
The exact programme used as a template was from a game against Spurs in 1942, I believe.
We show the original cover on the contents page.0 -
A testimonial for the next person to stay two seasons.The Red Robin said:
I wonder when we'll next play Spurs in the league.Ollywozere said:
It was used both in the 1930s and 1940s.shirty5 said:The claim that the cover is from the 40's is incorrect. The Cover is from the late 1930's.
The exact programme used as a template was from a game against Spurs in 1942, I believe.
We show the original cover on the contents page.2 -
What's the betting on the SMT open letter to fans then?
a) an olive branch pleading for a new relationship between club and fans
b) a warning about fans behaviour being monitored and transgressors to be dealt with firmly
c) a bland load of tosh about new season, high expectations, fortress valley etc
Or will everyone decide not to buy one to avoid putting money into Duchatelet's pocket?4 -
The last one for me, Davo.0
-
B and c0
-
Me too Fanny. But my money is on a mixture of c and b.Fanny Fanackapan said:The last one for me, Davo.
0 -
"Roland won't sell Charlton as he wants to make it a success here" is what I'm putting my money on0
-
The time to judge us is now...whoops, Katrien Meire already f*cked that one up.Davo55 said:What's the betting on the SMT open letter to fans then?
a) an olive branch pleading for a new relationship between club and fans
b) a warning about fans behaviour being monitored and transgressors to be dealt with firmly
c) a bland load of tosh about new season, high expectations, fortress valley etc
Or will everyone decide not to buy one to avoid putting money into Duchatelet's pocket?
Perhaps she'll go with 'I thought I explained this already...'0 -
So they got the idea for this from Nottingham Forest not CARD? Yeah, course you did.1
-
CARD version is free, and better, and isn't published in North Korea.5
-
Sponsored links:
-
Classic quote of why you need an 'agree' rather than 'like' button sometimes!sammy391 said:"Roland won't sell Charlton as he wants to make it a success here" is what I'm putting my money on
1 -
To be honest, it doesn't matter what the statement says. The message from the owner and SMT has been the same since they took over.0
-
"We are embarrassed by you" - SMT0
-
Copycats3
-
BartleyPark said:
"We are embarrassed by you" - SMT</blockquote
Not just the smt0 -
Good to see the club acknowledging CARD1
-
I will bring "three pounds" of flour for my copy!0
-
I'll have a fiver on B, please Davo.Davo55 said:What's the betting on the SMT open letter to fans then?
a) an olive branch pleading for a new relationship between club and fans
b) a warning about fans behaviour being monitored and transgressors to be dealt with firmly
c) a bland load of tosh about new season, high expectations, fortress valley etc
Or will everyone decide not to buy one to avoid putting money into Duchatelet's pocket?0 -
Whilst I was on work experience last summer (2015), Olly mentioned to me then that this was his idea for this season, so "copied" is a little unfair, but understandable why some believe that to be the case.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
It comes with a free pull out agreed behavioural contract.3
-
It was a joke, they are copying old programme covers, so did CARD, although I'd prefer to say CARD's were an homage!StubleyAddick said:Whilst I was on work experience last summer (2015), Olly mentioned to me then that this was his idea for this season, so "copied" is a little unfair, but understandable why some believe that to be the case.
0 -
No, that's just Sue Parkes...BartleyPark said:"We are embarrassed by you" - SMT
0 -
Cover of Museum opening day from Nov 2014 designed by @Ollywozere. Artistic inspiration meBartleyPark said:So they got the idea for this from Nottingham Forest not CARD? Yeah, course you did.
0 -
Not that that was the first use
0 -
From the museum's collection
0












